bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Rossano, F.

Publications and source records attributed to Rossano, F..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Domestic goats can follow the direction of human voices to solve a hidden-object task

The capacity for animals to produce and comprehend vocalisations that provide referential acoustic cues to their eliciting cause (e.g. predator-specific alarm calls and food calls) is a highly adaptive means of maximising the benefits of group living, and has been widely studied in diverse species. However, an underexplored dimension of referentiality is the ability to process the direction in which a vocalisation is emitted as a cue towards its referent. Here, we replicated an experimental design previously applied to dogs, chimpanzees and human infants to investigate whether domestic goats (Capra hircus) can use human voices as a directional cue in a hidden-object task. Twenty-nine goats from a UK sanctuary participated in three experimental conditions. In each condition, goats were individually presented with a human experimenter obscured by a barrier, and two identical containers, one of which was baited with food. In the reward directed speech condition, the experimenter vocalised excitedly towards the baited container while sitting closer to the un-baited container, and then the goat was able to select which container to explore. While substantial inter-individual variation existed, on average, subjects chose the baited container at above chance level across the four trials. Two control conditions explored alternative explanations for this result: a "no speech" condition, in which the experimenter was silent but remained in the same location as in the test condition, and a "non-reward directed speech" condition, in which the experimenter directed their voice away from both containers. Subjects showed no evidence of choosing the baited container at above chance level in either of these control conditions. We conclude that goats, like dogs, but not chimpanzees, are capable of attending to the directional cues provided by human voices, and discuss the possible role of domestication in the taxonomic distribution of this ability.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Chimpanzees and bonobos reinstate an interrupted triadic game

When humans engage in joint action, they seem to so with an underlying sense of joint commitment, a feeling of mutual obligation towards their partner and a shared goal. Whether our closest living relatives, bonobos and chimpanzees, experience and understand joint commitment in the same way is subject to debate. Crucial evidence concerns how participants respond to interruptions of joint actions, particularly if they protest or attempt to reengage their reluctant or distracted partners. During dyadic interactions, bonobos and chimpanzees appear to have some sense of joint commitment, according to recent studies. Yet, data are inconsistent for triadic games with objects. We addressed this issue by engaging N=23 apes (5 adult chimpanzees, 5 infant bonobos, 13 adult bonobos) in a "tug-of-war" game with a human experimenter who abruptly stopped playing. Adult apes readily attempted to reengage the experimenter (>60% of subjects on first trial), with no group differences in the way of reengagement. Infant bonobos rarely reengaged and never did so on their first trial. Importantly, when infants reengaged passive partners, they mostly deployed (tactile) signals, yet rarely game-related behaviours (GRBs) as commonly observed in adults. These findings might explain negative results of earlier research. Bonobos and chimpanzees may thus have motivational foundations for joint commitment, although this capacity might develop over lifetime. We discuss this finding in relation to evolutionary and developmental theories on joint commitment.

animal behavior and cognition↗