bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Rosas-Puchuri, U.

Publications and source records attributed to Rosas-Puchuri, U..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Non-linear phylogenetic regression using regularized kernels

O_LIPhylogenetic regression is a type of Generalized Least Squares (GLS) method that incorporates a covariance matrix based on the evolutionary relationships between species (i.e., phylogenetic relationships). While this method has found widespread use in hypothesis testing via comparative phylogenetic methods, such as phylogenetic ANOVA, its ability to account for non-linear relationships has received little attention. C_LIO_LITo address this issue, we utilized GLS in a high-dimensional feature space, employing linear combinations of transformed data to account for non-linearity, a common approach in kernel regression. We analyzed two biological datasets using both Radial Basis Function (RBF) and linear kernel transformations. The first dataset contained morphometric data, while the second dataset comprised discrete trait data and diversification rates as labels. Hyperparameter tuning of the model was achieved through cross-validation rounds in the training set. C_LIO_LIIn the tested biological datasets, regularized kernels reduced the error rate (as measured by RMSE) by around 20% compared to linear-based regression when data did not exhibit linear relationships. In simulated datasets, the error rate decreased almost exponentially with the level of non-linearity. C_LIO_LIThese results show that introducing kernels into phylogenetic regression analysis presents a novel and promising tool for complementing phylogenetic comparative methods. We have integrated this method into Python package named phyloKRR, which is freely available at: https://github.com/Ulises-Rosas/phylokrr. C_LI

evolutionary biology↗

Dissecting Factors Underlying Phylogenetic Uncertainty Using Machine Learning Models

Phylogenetic inference can be influenced by both underlying biological processes and methodological factors. While biological processes can be modeled, these models frequently make the assumption that methodological factors do not significantly influence the outcome of phylogenomic analyses. Depending on their severity, methodological factors can introduce inconsistency and uncertainty into the inference process. Although search protocols have been proposed to mitigate these issues, many solutions tend to treat factors independently or assume a linear relationship among them. In this study, we capitalize on the increasing size of phylogenetic datasets, using them to train machine learning models. This approach transcends the linearity assumption, accommodating complex non-linear relationships among features. We examined two phylogenomic datasets for teleost fishes: a newly generated dataset for protacanthopterygians (salmonids, galaxiids, marine smelts, and allies), and a reanalysis of a dataset for carangarians (flatfishes and allies). Upon testing five supervised machine learning models, we found that all outperformed the linear model (p < 0.05), with the deep neural network showing the best fit for both empirical datasets tested. Feature importance analyses indicated that influential factors were specific to individual datasets. The insights obtained have the potential to significantly enhance decision-making in phylogenetic analyses, assisting, for example, in the choice of suitable DNA sequence models and data transformation methods. This study can serve as a baseline for future endeavors aiming to capture non-linear interactions of features in phylogenomic datasets using machine learning and complement existing tools for phylogenetic analyses.

evolutionary biology↗