Biology subjects

Romisch, K.

Publications and source records attributed to Romisch, K..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

The conserved membrane-proximal domain of Sbh1/ Sec61β guides signal peptides into the Sec61 channel

In eukaryotes, protein secretion begins with protein translocation through the universally conserved Sec61 channel into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Its {beta}-subunit, Sbh1 in yeast, enhances ER import of proteins with specific suboptimal signal peptides by an unknown mechanism. The Sbh1 cytosolic N-terminus consists of an intrinsically disordered, non-conserved region (IDR) that has never been visualized in active channel structures, but is close to the translocating polypeptide in the cytosolic channel vestibule. The Sbh1/Sec61{beta} N-terminal IDR is followed by structured 15 amino acids and its C-terminal transmembrane helix, both of which are conserved. We show here that the proline and adjacent conserved residues at the Sbh1 cytosolic/transmembrane domain interface form a hinge that positions the Sbh1 cytosolic domain across the channel vestibule and orients it with respect to the lateral gate. This orientation is critical for Sbh1-dependent protein insertion into the channel. Sbh1-dependence of Sec61 channel insertion is a function of the signal peptide of the respective secretory protein. By chemical crosslinking of purified cytosolic domains of Sbh1 and its paralog Sbh2 to synthetic signal peptides derived from their respective client proteins, we show that the cytosolic domains of Sbh1 and Sbh2 contain specific signal peptide binding sites. The position of the crosslinked residues suggests that signal peptide binding is mediated by the IDRs. We conclude that Sec61{beta} homologs directly recognize signal peptides of their substrates and guide them into the Sec61 channel; they thus control entry of specific proteins into the secretory pathway.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2022

The ER protein translocation channel subunit Sbh1 controls virulence of Cryptococcus neoformans

The fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans is distinguished by a cell wall-anchored polysaccharide capsule that is critical for virulence. Biogenesis of both cell wall and capsule relies on the secretory pathway. Protein secretion begins with polypeptide translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane through a highly conserved channel formed by three proteins: Sec61, Sbh1, and Sss1. Sbh1, the most divergent, contains multiple phosphorylation sites, which may allow it to regulate entry into the secretory pathway in a species- and protein-specific manner. Absence of SBH1 causes a cell-wall defect in both Saccharomyces cerevisiae and C. neoformans, although other phenotypes differ. Notably, proteomic analysis showed that when cryptococci are grown in conditions that mimic aspects of the mammalian host environment (tissue culture medium, 37 {degrees}C, 5% CO2), a set of secretory and transmembrane proteins is upregulated in wild-type, but not in{Delta} sbh1 mutant cells. The Sbh1-dependent proteins show specific features of their ER targeting sequences that likely cause them to transit less efficiently into the secretory pathway. Many also act in cell-wall biogenesis, while several are known virulence factors; consistent with these observations, the C. neoformans {Delta}sbh1 mutant is avirulent in a mouse infection model. We conclude that, in the context of conditions encountered during infection, Sbh1 controls the entry of virulence factors into the secretory pathway of C. neoformans, and thereby regulates fungal pathogenicity. ImportanceCryptococcus neoformans is a yeast that causes almost 200,000 deaths worldwide each year, mainly of immunocompromised individuals. The surface structures of this pathogen, a protective cell wall surrounded by a polysaccharide capsule, are made and maintained by proteins that are synthesized inside the cell and travel outwards through the secretory pathway. A protein called Sbh1 is part of the machinery that determines which polypeptides enter this export pathway. We found that when Sbh1 is absent, both C. neoformans and the model yeast S. cerevisiae show cell wall defects. Lack of Sbh1 also changes the pattern of secretion of both transmembrane and soluble proteins, in a manner that depends on characteristics of their sequences. Notably, multiple proteins that are normally upregulated in conditions similar to those encountered during infection, including several needed for cryptococcal virulence, are no longer increased. Sbh1 thereby regulates the ability of this important pathogen to cause disease.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2022

ER translocation of suboptimal targeting sequences depends on Sec61β/Sbh1 and its phosphorylation

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) protein translocation channel subunit Sec61{beta}/Sbh1 is non-essential, but contains multiple phosphorylation sites suggesting a regulatory role in ER protein import. We show here that mutating two N-terminal, proline-flanked, phosphorylation sites in the Sbh1 cytosolic domain phenocopies the temperature-sensitivity of a yeast strain lacking SBH1/SBH2, and results in reduced translocation into the ER of an Sbh1-dependent substrate, Gls1. In a microscopic screen we show that about 12% of GFP-tagged secretory proteins depend on Sbh1 for translocation. Sbh1-dependent proteins have targeting sequences with less pronounced hydrophobicity and often no or an inverse charge bias. A subset of these proteins was dependent on N-terminal phosphorylation of Sbh1 and on the phospho-S/T-specific proline isomerase Ess1 (PIN1 in mammals) for ER import. We conclude that Sbh1 promotes ER translocation of substrates with suboptimal targeting sequences and that its activity is regulated by a conformational change induced by N-terminal phosphorylation.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2018

Effect of Sec61 interaction with Mpd1 on Endoplasmic Reticulum-Associated Degradation

Proteins that misfold in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) are transported back to the cytosol for ER-associated degradation (ERAD). The Sec61 channel is one of the candidates for the retrograde transport conduit. Channel opening from the ER lumen must be triggered by ERAD factors and substrates. Here we identified new lumenal interaction partners of Sec61 by chemical crosslinking and mass spectrometry. In addition to known Sec61 interactors we detected ERAD factors including Cue1, Ubc6, Ubc7, Asi3, and Mpd1. We show that the CPY* ERAD factor Mpd1 binds to the lumenal Sec61 hinge region. Deletion of the Mpd1 binding site reduced the interaction between both proteins and caused an ERAD defect specific for CPY* without affecting protein import into the ER or ERAD of other substrates. Our data suggest that Mpd1 binding to Sec61 is a prerequisite for CPY* ERAD and confirm a role of Sec61 in ERAD of misfolded secretory proteins.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2018

The N-terminus of Sec61p plays key roles in ER protein import and ERAD

Sec61p is the channel-forming subunit of the heterotrimeric Sec61 complex that mediates co-translational protein import into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). In yeast, proteins can also be post-translationally translocated by the hetero-heptameric Sec complex, composed of the Sec61 and the Sec63 complexes. The Sec61 channel is also a candidate for the dislocation channel for misfolded proteins from the ER to the cytosol during ER-associated degradation (ERAD). The structure of the Sec61 complex is highly conserved, but the roles of its N-terminal acetylation and its amphipathic N-terminal helix are unknown so far. To gain insight into the function of the Sec61p N-terminus, we mutated its N-acetylation site, deleted its amphipathic helix, or both the helix and the N-acetylation site. Mutation of the N-acetylation site on its own had no effect on protein import into the ER in intact cells, but resulted in an ERAD defect. Yeast expressing sec61 without the N-terminal amphipathic helix displayed severe growth defects and had profound defects in post-translational protein import into the ER. Nevertheless the formation of the hetero-heptameric Sec complex was not affected. Instead, the lack of the N-terminal amphipathic helix compromised the integrity of the heterotrimeric Sec61 complex. We conclude that the N-terminal helix of Sec61p is required for post-translational protein import into the ER and Sec61 complex stability, whereas N-terminal acetylation of Sec61p plays a role in ERAD.

biochemistry↗