bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Rogers, Z. J.

Publications and source records attributed to Rogers, Z. J..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Lymph node resident memory T cells retain effector capabilities by evading lung resident memory dysfunction.

Resident memory T cells (TRM) mediate localized immunity in barrier tissues while central memory T cells (TCM) recirculate through lymphoid organs to surveil for reinfection. Although TRM are classically associated with peripheral non-lymphoid tissues, they have also been identified within lymph nodes (LNRM) where the mechanisms guiding their formation and functional differences remain poorly understood. Here we used longitudinal antibody labeling to track the migratory history of memory T cells after influenza infection and demonstrate that CD69+CD103+ T cells are resident in the lymph node. LNRM accumulate evenly throughout the lung-draining lymph node and are present within all analyzed LN compartments including, the sub capsular sinus, T cell zone and germinal centers. Epigenetic and transcriptional profiling reveal that LNRM are uniquely poised for cytotoxicity whereas TRM in the lung (LungRM) resemble exhausted cells with elevated expression of inhibitory receptors and increased chromatin accessibility at the Pdcd1 locus. Regulatory network analysis of transcription factors, combined with target gene expression and chromatin accessibility, identified key regulons differentiating TCM, LNRM and LungRM states. Upon antigen re-encounter, LNRM are more proliferative, cytotoxic, and produce more IFN{gamma} compared to LungRM. Notably, we find that LNRM represent the most prevalent subset of memory T cells in human thoracic lymph nodes. These findings highlight functional heterogeneity in TRM and establish LNRM as a distinct and durable memory T cell population bridging features of circulating and tissue-resident cells.

immunology↗

Controlling pericellular oxygen tension in cell culture reveals distinct breast cancer responses to low oxygen tensions

Oxygen (O2) tension plays a key role in tissue function and pathophysiology. O2-controlled cell culture, in which the O2 concentration in an incubators gas phase is controlled, is an indispensable tool to study the role of O2 in vivo. For this technique, it is presumed that the incubator setpoint is equal to the O2 tension that cells experience (i.e., pericellular O2). We discovered that physioxic (5% O2) and hypoxic (1% O2) setpoints regularly induce anoxic (0.0% O2) pericellular tensions in both adherent and suspension cell cultures. Electron transport chain inhibition ablates this effect, indicating that cellular O2 consumption is the driving factor. RNA-seq revealed that primary human hepatocytes cultured in physioxia experience ischemia-reperfusion injury due to anoxic exposure followed by rapid reoxygenation. To better understand the relationship between incubator gas phase and pericellular O2 tensions, we developed a reaction-diffusion model that predicts pericellular O2 tension a priori. This model revealed that the effect of cellular O2 consumption is greatest in smaller volume culture vessels (e.g., 96-well plate). By controlling pericellular O2 tension in cell culture, we discovered that MCF7 cells have stronger glycolytic and glutamine metabolism responses in anoxia vs. hypoxia. MCF7 also expressed higher levels of HIF2A, CD73, NDUFA4L2, etc. and lower levels of HIF1A, CA9, VEGFA, etc. in response to hypoxia vs. anoxia. Proteomics revealed that 4T1 cells had an upregulated epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) response and downregulated reactive oxygen species (ROS) management, glycolysis, and fatty acid metabolism pathways in hypoxia vs. anoxia. Collectively, these results reveal that breast cancer cells respond non-monotonically to low O2, suggesting that anoxic cell culture is not suitable to model hypoxia. We demonstrate that controlling atmospheric O2 tension in cell culture incubators is insufficient to control O2 in cell culture and introduce the concept of pericellular O2-controlled cell culture.

bioengineering↗