bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Roberts, R. P.

Publications and source records attributed to Roberts, R. P..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Thalamic nuclei insights into Alzheimer's disease

INTRODUCTIONThalamic nuclei support multiple cognitive processes, yet their integrity in biologically-defined Alzheimers disease (AD) remains unknown. METHODAmyloid status was determined using PET Centiloids >24 in 1,327 participants from ADNI. Combined with clinical diagnosis, this yielded six groups: amyloid-negative or positive CN-MCI-dementia/AD. Thalamic nuclei volumes were extracted from T1-weighted MRI using the HIPS-THOMAS algorithm. RESULTSLarge volume reductions in the anteroventral, mediodorsal, and pulvinar nuclei were observed in amyloid-positive MCI and AD. Reduced volumes were also evident in amyloid-positive CN, supporting preclinical AD. Adding the anteroventral nucleus improved cognitive status classification in Random Forest analyses. A phenotypic model integrating thalamic nuclei clearly distinguished amyloid-positive groups from amyloid-negative CN and reclassified non-AD patients with 68% of amyloid-negative MCI subjects as CN-like, and 27% of amyloid-positive CN as MCI-like. DISCUSSIONThalamic volumetry from conventional T1-weighted MRI enhances clinical insight into AD and provides a practical biomarker for disease intervention.

neuroscience↗

Retinotopic mapping data permit accurate matching of participants across different datasets

Public sharing of neuroimaging data is becoming increasingly common for the advancement and validation of scientific research. However, this sharing poses challenges regarding privacy and data safety, and associated questions about the ownership of research data. Here we show that a simple pattern correlation algorithm can match nominally deidentified participants across two separate functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiments. This re-identification procedure is effective despite functional maps being spatially warped to a common template brain. This work highlights the need for appropriate safeguards against possible misuse of shared neuroimaging data.

neuroscience↗

Reassessing the functional significance of BOLD variability

BOLD variability (SDBOLD) has emerged as a unique measure of the adaptive properties of neural systems that facilitate fast, stable responding, based on claims that SDBOLD is independent of mean BOLD signal (meanBOLD) and a powerful predictor of behavioural performance. We challenge these two claims. First, the apparent independence of SDBOLD and meanBOLD may reflect the presence of deactivations; we hypothesize that while SDBOLD may not be related to raw meanBOLD it will be linearly related to absolute meanBOLD. Second, the observed relationship between SDBOLD and performance may be an artifact of using fixed-length trials longer than response times. Such designs provide opportunities to toggle between on- and off-task states, and fast responders likely engage in more frequent state-switching, thereby artificially elevating SDBOLD. We hypothesize that SDBOLD will be higher and more strongly related to performance when using such fixed-length trials relative to self-paced trials that terminate upon a response. We test these two hypotheses in an fMRI study using blocks of fixed-length or self-paced trials. Results confirmed both hypotheses: (1) SDBOLD was robustly related with absolute meanBOLD; and (2) toggling between on- and off-task states during fixed-length trials reliably contributed to SDBOLD. Together, these findings suggest that a reappraisal of the functional significance of SDBOLD as a unique marker of cognitive performance is warranted.

neuroscience↗