bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Rillo, M. C.

Publications and source records attributed to Rillo, M. C..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Asymmetric leading vs. trailing edge shifts since the Last Glacial Maximum underpin the modern bimodal latitudinal diversity gradient in planktonic foraminifera

AimThe modern latitudinal diversity gradient of planktonic foraminifera is bimodal with a distinct depression near the equator, surrounded by mid-latitude diversity peaks. This pattern emerged after the Last Glacial Maximum, but it is unclear how species spatial dynamics contributed to its formation. Here, we investigate how species range dynamics, i.e., trailing-edge contractions (extirpations) and leading-edge expansions (colonisations), shaped the modern bimodal pattern, and how global biodiversity patterns arise from local patterns. LocationGlobal open ocean, with basin-specific analyses in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. Time periodLast Glacial Maximum (19 - 23 ka) (LGM) and the Pre-Industrial (modern) Major taxa studiedPlanktonic foraminifera (unicellular eukaryotes) MethodsWe analysed taxonomically standardized LGM and modern foraminiferal assemblage datasets to characterize changes in species richness at multiple spatial scales: global ocean, basin-wide, and within basin. We quantified species range shifts by comparing their trailing- and leading-edge movements. We estimated temporal turnover locally, and the net imbalance between colonisations and extirpations (NICE) within sites, and tested whether species thermal preferences correlate with their extirpation risk. ResultsWe found no evidence of systematic trailing edge contractions, indicating that equatorial extirpations did not drive the bimodal LDG pattern. In the Atlantic, leading-edge expansions generated a coherent increase in species richness in the mid-latitudes, whereas the Pacific exhibited highly spatially heterogeneous responses, including extirpation hotspots in the western tropical Pacific and colonisation zones in the eastern and southern Pacific. Species thermal optima weakly predicted extirpations, with species adapted to lower temperatures more at risk of extirpation, consistent with the general warming trend since the last ice age. Main conclusionsThe modern bimodal LDG of planktonic foraminifera arises primarily from mid-latitude colonisations rather than equatorial extirpations. Colonisations were particularly frequent in the North Atlantic. Localized extirpations in the western Pacific highlight small-scale patches of vulnerability, that spatially aggregated richness metrics mask. Our results underscore the need to distinguish between trailing and leading processes in climate-induced range shifts, and to consider spatial variability in monitoring and protection of marine biodiversity.

ecology↗

Migration load, competition, and metabolic trade-offs shape spatial divergence through eco-evolutionary dynamics

Evolutionary models predict that trade-offs related to resource utilization promote local specialization and diversification in spatially heterogeneous environments. However, diversification is also influenced by ecological feedback mechanisms - such as frequency-dependent resource use - and their interaction with migration. To investigate how spatial variation affects diversification, we conducted an evolution experiment exposing populations of Lactococcus cremoris to divergent selection on two carbon sources: fructose and galactose. Using a continuous culture system, we partitioned these resources into two isolated patches (allopatry), two patches with constant migration between them (parapatry), and one fully-mixed patch (sympatry). Resource specialization and subsequent phenotypic diversification evolved in all treatments, revealing a metabolic trade-off between fructose and galactose utilization. Compared to treatments without migration, spatial variation produced a distinctive temporal pattern: migration initially delayed specialization on galactose but later accelerated it. This temporal pattern emerged from eco-evolutionary feedbacks operating through two mechanisms: (i) early in the experiment, higher population density in the better-suited fructose patch increased the influx of maladapted immigrants into the galactose patch, slowing local adaptation; however, (ii) as strains adapted locally to galactose, population density increased in the galactose patch and density asymmetries weakened. Simultaneously, the competitive ability of immigrants declined as residents became increasingly specialized in their local resources, progressively reducing the effective migration rate and allowing accelerated divergence. Our experiment demonstrates how the likelihood and tempo of spatial divergence depend on the evolvability of phenotypic trade-offs and their dynamic interaction with migration load and population density.

ecology↗

Predictability of intraspecific size variation in extant planktonic foraminifera

The size structure of plankton communities is an important determinant of their functions in marine ecosystems. However, few studies have quantified how organism size varies within species across space. Using a recently-digitised museum collection, we investigate at high intraspecific resolution how planktonic foraminifera, an important microfossil group, vary in size across the tropical and subtropical oceans of the world. We measured 3799 individuals of nine species in 53 seafloor sediments and analysed potential size biases in the museum collection. For each site, we obtained corresponding local values of mean annual sea-surface temperature (SST), net primary productivity (NPP), and relative abundance of each species. Given former studies, we expected species to reach largest shell sizes under optimal environmental conditions. At species level, we find the expected pattern; however, at population level, species greatly differ in how much size variation is explained by SST, NPP and/or relative abundance. While some species show a high predictability of size variation given one single variable (Trilobatus sacculifer, Globigerinella siphonifera, Pulleniatina obliquiloculata, Globorotalia truncatulinoides), other species showed either weak or no relationships between size and the studied covariates (Globigerinoides ruber, G. conglobatus, Neogloboquadrina dutertrei, G. menardii, Globoconella inflata). By incorporating intraspecific variation and sampling broader geographical ranges compared to previous studies, we conclude that shell size variation in planktonic foraminifera species cannot be consistently predicted by the environment. Our results caution against the general use of size as a proxy for planktonic foraminifera environmental optima, and emphasise the need for more studies analysing their within-species size variation. More generally, our findings show that contrasting results can be obtained when analysing patterns at different organisational levels, and highlights the utility of natural history collections.

ecology↗

Surface sediment samples from early age of seafloor exploration can provide a late 19th century baseline of the marine environment

Ocean-floor sediment samples collected up to 150 years ago represent an important historical archive to benchmark global changes in the seafloor environment, such as species range shifts and invasions and pollution trends. Such benchmarking requires that the historical sediment samples represent the state of the environment at or shortly before the time of collection. However, early oceanographic expeditions sampled the ocean floor using devices like the sounding tube or a dredge, which potentially disturb the sediment surface and recover a mix of Holocene (surface) and deeper, Pleistocene sediments. Here we use climate-sensitive microfossils as a fast biometric method to assess if historical seafloor samples contain a mixture of modern and glacial sediments. Our assessment is based on comparing the composition of planktonic foraminifera (PF) assemblages in historical samples with Holocene and Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) global reference datasets. We show that eight out of the nine historical samples contain PF assemblages more similar to the Holocene than to the LGM PF assemblages, but the comparisons are only significant when there is a high local species temporal turnover (from the LGM to the Holocene). When analysing temporal turnover globally, we show that upwelling and temperate regions had greatest species turnover, which are areas where our methodology would be most diagnostic. Our results suggest that sediment samples from historical collections can provide a baseline of the state of marine ecosystems in the late 19th century, and thus be used to assess ocean global change trends.

paleontology↗