bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Richter, C. G.

Publications and source records attributed to Richter, C. G..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Temporal uncertainty affects the visual processing of predicted stimulus properties

Predictive processing has been proposed as a fundamental cognitive mechanism to account for how the brain interacts with the external environment via its sensory systems. In vision, contextual information triggers predictions about the content ("what") of environmental stimuli to update an internal generative model of the surrounding world. However, visual information dynamically changes across time, and temporal predictability ("when") may influence the impact of internal predictions on visual processing. In this magnetoencephalography (MEG) study, we investigated how processing feature specific information ("what") is affected by temporal predictability ("when"). In line with previous findings, we observed suppression of evoked neural responses in the visual cortex for predictable stimuli. Interestingly, we found that temporal uncertainty increased expectation suppression. This suggests that in temporally uncertain scenarios the neurocognitive system invests less resources in integrating bottom-up information. Multivariate pattern analysis showed that predictable visual features could be decoded from neural responses. Temporal uncertainty did not affect decoding accuracy for early visual responses, with the feature specificity of early visual neural activity preserved across conditions. However, decoding accuracy was less sustained over time for temporally jittered than for isochronous predictable visual stimuli. These findings converge to suggest that the cognitive system processes visual features of temporally predictable stimuli in higher detail, while processing temporally uncertain stimuli may rely more heavily on abstract internal expectations.

neuroscience↗

Pre-stimulus beta-band activity is a signature of statistical learning

Statistical learning (SL) is taken to be the main mechanism by which cognitive systems discover the underlying regularities of the environment. We document, in the context of a classical visual SL task, divergent rhythmic EEG activity during the anticipation of stimuli within patterns versus pattern transitions. Our findings reveal differential pre-stimulus oscillatory activity in the beta band ([~]20 Hz) that indexes learning: it emerges with increased pattern repetitions, and importantly, it is highly correlated with behavioral learning outcomes. These findings hold the promise of converging on an online measure of learning regularities and provide important theoretical insights regarding the mechanisms of SL and prediction. Significance StatementSL has become a major theoretical construct in cognitive science, providing the primary means by which organisms learn about regularities in the environment. As such it is a critical building block for basic and higher-order cognitive functions. Here we identify for the first time a spectral neural index in the time window prior to stimulus presentation, which evolves with increased pattern exposure, and is predictive of learning performance. The manifestation of learning that is revealed not in stimulus processing but in anticipatory moments of the learning episode, makes a direct link between the fields of statistical learning and predictive processing, and suggests a possible mechanistic account of visual SL.

neuroscience↗

Brain rhythms shift and deploy attention

One of the most central cognitive functions is attention. Its neuronal underpinnings have primarily been studied during conditions of sustained attention. Much less is known about the neuronal dynamics underlying the processes of shifting attention in space, as compared to maintaining it on one stimulus, and of deploying it to a particular stimulus. Here, we use ECoG to investigate four rhythms across large parts of the left hemisphere of two macaque monkeys during a task that allows investigation of deployment and shifting. Shifting involved a strong transient enhancement of power in a 2-7 Hz theta band in frontal, pre-motor and visual areas, and reductions of power in an 11-20 Hz beta band in a fronto-centro-parietal network and in a 29-36 Hz high-beta band in premotor cortex. Deployment of attention to the contralateral hemifield involved an enhancement of beta power in parietal areas, a concomitant reduction of high-beta power in pre-motor areas and an enhancement of power in a 60-76 Hz gamma band in extra-striate cortex. Effects due to shifting occurred earlier than effects due to deployment. These results demonstrate that the four investigated rhythms are involved in attentional allocation, with striking differences between shifting and deployment between different brain areas.\n\nSignificanceWe are often confronted by many visual stimuli, and attentional mechanisms select one stimulus for in-depth processing. This involves that attention is shifted between stimuli and deployed to one stimulus at a time. Prior studies have revealed that these processes are subserved by several brain rhythms. Therefore, we recorded brain activity in macaque monkeys with many electrodes distributed over large parts of their left hemisphere, while they performed a task that involved shifting and deploying attention. We found four dominant rhythms: theta (2-7 Hz), beta (11-20 Hz), high-beta (29-36 Hz) and gamma (60-76 Hz). Attentional shifting and deployment involved dynamic modulations in the strength of those rhythms with high specificity in space and time.

neuroscience↗

A simulation and comparison of dynamic functional connectivity methods

There is a current interest in quantifying brain dynamic functional connectivity (DFC) based on neuroimaging data such as fMRI. Many methods have been proposed, and are being applied, revealing new insight into the brains dynamics. However, given that the ground truth for DFC in the brain is unknown, many concerns remain regarding the accuracy of proposed estimates. Since there exists many DFC methods it is difficult to assess differences in dynamic brain connectivity between studies. Here, we evaluate five different methods that together represent a wide spectrum of current approaches to estimating DFC (sliding window, tapered sliding window, temporal derivative, spatial distance and jackknife correlation). In particular, we were interested in each methods ability to track changes in covariance over time, which is a key property in DFC analysis. We found that all tested methods correlated positively with each other, but there were large differences in the strength of the correlations between methods. To facilitate comparisons with future DFC methods, we propose that the described simulations can act as benchmark tests for evaluation of methods. In this paper, we present dfcbenchmarker, which is a Python package where researchers can easily submit and compare their own DFC methods to evaluate its performance.

neuroscience↗