Biology subjects

Renner, D. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Renner, D. M..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

Betacoronaviruses Differentially Activate the Integrated Stress Response to Optimize Viral Replication in Lung Derived Cell Lines

The betacoronavirus genus contains five of the seven human viruses, making it a particularly critical area of research to prepare for future viral emergence. We utilized three human betacoronaviruses, one from each subgenus-HCoV-OC43 (embecovirus), SARS-CoV-2 (sarbecovirus) and MERS-CoV (merbecovirus)- to study betacoronavirus interaction with the PKR-like ER kinase (PERK) pathway of the integrated stress response (ISR)/unfolded protein response (UPR). The PERK pathway becomes activated by an abundance of unfolded proteins within the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), leading to phosphorylation of eIF2 and translational attenuation in lung derived cell lines. We demonstrate that MERS-CoV, HCoV-OC43, and SARS-CoV-2 all activate PERK and induce responses downstream of p-eIF2, while only SARS-CoV-2 induces detectable p-eIF2 during infection. Using a small molecule inhibitor of eIF2 dephosphorylation, we provide evidence that MERS-CoV and HCoV-OC43 maximize replication through p-eIF2 dephosphorylation. Interestingly, genetic ablation of GADD34 expression, an inducible phosphatase 1 (PP1)-interacting partner targeting eIF2 for dephosphorylation, did not significantly alter HCoV-OC43 or SARS-CoV-2 replication, while siRNA knockdown of the constitutive PP1 partner, CReP, dramatically reduced HCoV-OC43 replication. Combining growth arrest and DNA damage-inducible protein (GADD34) knockout with peripheral ER membrane-targeted protein (CReP) knockdown had the maximum impact on HCoV-OC43 replication, while SARS-CoV-2 replication was unaffected. Overall, we conclude that eIF2 dephosphorylation is critical for efficient protein production and replication during MERS-CoV and HCoV-OC43 infection. SARS-CoV-2, however, appears to be insensitive to p-eIF2 and, during infection, may even downregulate dephosphorylation to limit host translation. IMPORTANCELethal human betacoronaviruses have emerged three times in the last two decades, causing two epidemics and a pandemic. Here, we demonstrate differences in how these viruses interact with cellular translational control mechanisms. Utilizing inhibitory compounds and genetic ablation, we demonstrate that MERS-CoV and HCoV-OC43 benefit from keeping p-eIF2 levels low to maintain high rates of virus translation while SARS-CoV-2 tolerates high levels of p-eIF2. We utilized a PP1:GADD34/CReP inhibitor, GADD34 KO cells, and CReP-targeting siRNA to investigate the therapeutic potential of these pathways. While ineffective for SARS-CoV-2, we found that HCoV-OC43 seems to primarily utilize CReP to limit p-eIF2a accumulation. This work highlights the need to consider differences amongst these viruses, which may inform the development of host-directed pan-coronavirus therapeutics.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2023

Interferon signaling in the nasal epithelium distinguishes among lethal and common cold respiratory viruses and is critical for viral clearance

All respiratory viruses establish primary infections in the nasal epithelium, where efficient innate immune induction may prevent dissemination to the lower airway and thus minimize pathogenesis. Human coronaviruses (HCoVs) cause a range of pathologies, but the host and viral determinants of disease during common cold versus lethal HCoV infections are poorly understood. We model the initial site of infection using primary nasal epithelial cells cultured at air-liquid interface (ALI). HCoV-229E, HCoV-NL63 and human rhinovirus-16 are common cold-associated viruses that exhibit unique features in this model: early induction of antiviral interferon (IFN) signaling, IFN-mediated viral clearance, and preferential replication at nasal airway temperature (33{degrees}C) which confers muted host IFN responses. In contrast, lethal SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV encode antagonist proteins that prevent IFN-mediated clearance in nasal cultures. Our study identifies features shared among common cold-associated viruses, highlighting nasal innate immune responses as predictive of infection outcomes and nasally-directed IFNs as potential therapeutics.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2021

SARS-CoV-2 diverges from other betacoronaviruses in only partially activating the IRE1α/XBP1 ER stress pathway in human lung-derived cells

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has killed over 6 million individuals worldwide and continues to spread in countries where vaccines are not yet widely available, or its citizens are hesitant to become vaccinated. Therefore, it is critical to unravel the molecular mechanisms that allow SARS-CoV-2 and other coronaviruses to infect and overtake the host machinery of human cells. Coronavirus replication triggers endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and activation of the unfolded protein response (UPR), a key host cell pathway widely believed essential for viral replication. We examined the master UPR sensor IRE1 kinase/RNase and its downstream transcription factor effector XBP1s, which is processed through an IRE1-mediated mRNA splicing event, in human lung-derived cells infected with betacoronaviruses. We found human respiratory coronavirus OC43 (HCoV-OC43), Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), and murine coronavirus (MHV) all induce ER stress and strongly trigger the kinase and RNase activities of IRE1 as well as XBP1 splicing. In contrast, SARS-CoV-2 only partially activates IRE1 through autophosphorylation, but its RNase activity fails to splice XBP1. Moreover, while IRE1 was dispensable for replication in human cells for all coronaviruses tested, it was required for maximal expression of genes associated with several key cellular functions, including the interferon signaling pathway, during SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our data suggest that SARS-CoV-2 actively inhibits the RNase of autophosphorylated IRE1, perhaps as a strategy to eliminate detection by the host immune system. IMPORTANCESARS-CoV-2 is the third lethal respiratory coronavirus after MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV to emerge this century, causing millions of deaths world-wide. Other common coronaviruses such as HCoV-OC43 cause less severe respiratory disease. Thus, it is imperative to understand the similarities and differences among these viruses in how each interacts with host cells. We focused here on the inositol-requiring enzyme 1 (IRE1) pathway, part of the host unfolded protein response to virus-induced stress. We found that while MERS-CoV and HCoV-OC43 fully activate the IRE1 kinase and RNase activities, SARS-CoV-2 only partially activates IRE1, promoting its kinase activity but not RNase activity. Based on IRE1-dependent gene expression changes during infection, we propose that SARS-CoV-2 prevents IRE1 RNase activation as a strategy to limit detection by the host immune system.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2019

The host antiviral ribonuclease L protein supports Zika virus replication factory formation to enhance infectious virus production

The flavivirus Zika virus (ZIKV) activates ribonuclease L (RNase L) catalytic antiviral function during infection, yet deletion of RNase L decreases ZIKV production, suggesting a proviral role of RNase L. In this study, we reveal that latent RNase L supports ZIKV replication factory (RF) assembly. Deletion of RNase L induced broader cellular distribution of ZIKV dsRNA and NS3 compared with densely concentrated RFs detected in WT cells. An inactive form of RNase L was sufficient to contain ZIKV genome and dsRNA within a smaller area, which increased levels of viral RNA within RFs as well as infectious ZIKV released from the cell. We used a microtubule stabilization drug to demonstrate that RNase L deletion impaired the cytoskeleton rearrangements that are required for proper generation of RFs. During infection with dengue or West Nile Kunjin viruses, RNase L decreased virus production, suggesting that RNase L proviral function is specific to ZIKV.

microbiology↗