bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Rendell, L.

Publications and source records attributed to Rendell, L..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

The diffusion of cooperative and solo bubble net feeding in Canadian Pacific humpback whales

Cooperative foraging, a mutualistic resource acquisition behaviour observed across diverse taxa, can drive social network structure, as it typically involves high rates of interactions between individuals. Understanding the mechanisms and distribution of such behaviours is important to elucidate the drivers of social organisation. Bubble net feeding ( bubble netting) is a specialised foraging technique practised by certain humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) populations globally. Over 20 years of study in the northern Canadian Pacific, we observed the diffusion of two morphs of this behaviour: social cooperative and independent, or solo, bubble netting. Network-based diffusion analyses - a tool developed to test for social learning - find strong evidence for the social learning of bubble netting when a static social network is used, even after accounting for individual-level traits such as site fidelity and sex (10.6 x103 to 35.4x103 times more support for social versus asocial learning; p < 0.0001). However, we could not completely exclude homophily due to the inherent sociality of this cooperative foraging behaviour. Nonetheless, it is clear that the rapid diffusion of bubble netting throughout this population has significant consequences for its social structure, which should be information considered by those planning the conservation of this threatened population.

animal behavior and cognition↗

The refinement paradox and cumulative cultural evolution: collective improvement in knowledge favors conformity, blind copying and hyper-credulity

Social learning is common in nature, yet cumulative culture (where knowledge and technology increase in complexity and diversity over time) appears restricted to humans. To understand why, we organized a computer tournament in which programmed entries specified when to learn new knowledge and when to refine (i.e. improve) existing knowledge. The tournament revealed a refinement paradox: refined behavior afforded higher payoffs as individuals converged on a small number of successful behavioral variants, but refining did not generally pay. Paradoxically, entries that refined only in certain conditions did best during behavioral improvement, while simple copying entries thrived when refinement levels were high. Cumulative cultural evolution may be rare in part because sophisticated strategies for improving knowledge and technology are initially advantageous, yet complex culture, once achieved, favors conformity, blind imitation and hyper-credulity.

evolutionary biology↗