bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Rehm, H. L.

Publications and source records attributed to Rehm, H. L..

17 recordsLinked to original sources

Human Proteome-wide Mechanistic Interpretation of Missense Variants through Protein Feature Enrichment Score

Missense variant interpretation remains a central challenge in clinical and medical genetics, with most observed variants being variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Computational variant effect predictors can achieve high pathogenicity classification performance, but without revealing the underlying mechanism and a translatable interpretation. Here we present the Protein Feature Enrichment Score (PFES), which quantifies the molecular context of missense variants through statistical enrichment of 103 protein structural, functional, and physicochemical features across 85,321 pathogenic and 130,719 control variants spanning 20 protein functional classes. We show that the protein feature (PF) enrichment patterns of variants are conserved within functional classes and vary substantially across classes, both in magnitude and directions depending on functional context. PFES not only partitions variants into PF-Enriched (pathogenic-like), PF-Neutral, and PF-Depleted (benign-like) categories but also provides a mechanistic interpretation by decomposing the score into subscores from biologically interpretable protein feature attributes. We demonstrate that PFES shows a high concordance with VUS reclassification and prioritization: across 596 genes, pathogenicity-leaning VUS-high variants were seven-fold enriched in PF-Enriched variants. PFES decomposition further revealed that loss-of-function and gain-of-function variants are distinguished by disproportionate enrichment of protein-protein interaction features in the latter. We computed PFES across 223 million possible missense variants (17.7% PF-Enriched) and built a publicly available resource that addresses not just whether a variant is pathogenic, but which protein characteristics are disrupted. Proteome-wide application across 20,153 genes prioritizes established rare disease genes and nominates therapeutically amenable targets whose pathogenic variation is driven by interpretable structural and functional protein feature disruption. One Sentence SummaryPFES is a proteome-wide resource to quantify the protein context of missense variants, enabling mechanistically transparent variant interpretation.

bioinformatics↗

Building an Interoperable Rare Disease Multi-omic Resource: The GREGoR Data Model and Dataset

Rare disease research and diagnosis rely on the integration of genomic and phenotypic data generated across diverse clinical sites; however, the absence of widely adopted standards for representing genomic data and associated metadata has limited data interoperability, reuse, and cross-study analysis. The Genomics Research to Elucidate the Genetics of Rare Diseases (GREGoR) Consortium was established to investigate challenging rare disease cases and evaluate emerging multi-omic technologies for clinical translation. To support coordinated data integration across distributed research sites, we developed a common Consortium Data Model in partnership with domain experts to standardize the capture of participant-, family-, phenotype- and assay-level metadata, with a particular emphasis on using a modular architecture to support linking of multiple data versions from multiple omic technologies to a single individual and attribution of a genetic finding to the specific technology used for its initial discovery. Adoption of the GREGoR Data Model has enabled continued generation and public release of a harmonized, analysis-ready Consortium Dataset. The most recent release includes phenotypic, family and multi-omic data from 12,292 participants in 5,029 families. Other rare disease data sharing efforts are beginning to adopt this data model which will facilitate cross consortium analyses and empower rare disease research. This work demonstrates that a collaborative, flexible, and scalable data model can enable large-scale rare disease research, facilitate cross-center data harmonization, and enable data interoperability.

genomics↗

Evidence Aggregator: AI reasoning applied to rare disease diagnostics

Variant assessment of rare disease diagnostics depends on using domain knowledge in the time- consuming process of retrieving, reviewing, and synthesizing clinical and technical information. To address these challenges, we developed the Evidence Aggregator (EvAgg), an open-source, generative-AI-based tool designed for rare disease diagnosis that systematically extracts relevant information from the scientific literature for any human gene. EvAgg provides a thorough and current summary of observed genetic variants and their associated clinical features, enabling rapid synthesis of evidence concerning gene-disease relationships. We constructed an expert-curated dataset and evaluated EvAggs performance. EvAgg achieves 92% recall in identifying relevant papers, 96% recall in detecting instances of genetic variation within those papers, and [~]80% accuracy in extracting individual case and variant-level content (e.g. zygosity, inheritance, variant type, and phenotype). Further, EvAgg complemented the process of manual literature review by identifying substantial additional relevant information. When tested with analysts in rare disease case analysis, EvAgg reduced review time by 34% (p-value < 0.002) and increased the number of papers, variants, and cases evaluated per unit time. These savings have the potential to reduce diagnostic latency and increase solve rates for challenging rare disease cases.

genomics↗

Defining a tandem repeat catalog and variation clusters for genome-wide analyses and population databases

Tandem repeat (TR) catalogs are important components of repeat genotyping studies as they define the genomic coordinates and expected motifs of all TR loci being analyzed. In recent years, genome-wide studies have used catalogs ranging in size from fewer than 200,000 to over 7 million loci. Where these catalogs overlapped, they often disagreed on locus boundaries, hindering the comparison and reuse of results across studies. Now, with multiple groups developing public databases of TR variation in large population cohorts, there is a risk that, without sufficient consensus in the choice of locus definitions, the use of divergent repeat catalogs will lead to confusion, fragmentation, and incompatibility across resources. In this paper, we compare existing TR catalogs and discuss desirable features of a comprehensive genome-wide catalog. We then present a new, richly annotated catalog designed for large-scale analyses and population databases. This new catalog, which we call the TRExplorer catalog v1.0, contains 4.86 million TR loci and, unlike most catalogs, is designed to be useful for both short-read and long-read analyses. It consists of 4,803,366 STRs and 59,675 VNTRs, of which 780,607 STRs and 21,888 VNTRs are both polymorphic and entirely absent from widely-used catalogs previously developed for short-read analyses. Additionally, our catalog stratifies TRs into two groups: 1) isolated TRs suitable for repeat copy number analysis using short-read or long-read data and 2) so-called variation clusters that contain TRs within wider polymorphic regions that are best studied through sequence-level analysis. To define variation clusters, we present a novel algorithm that leverages long-read HiFi sequencing data to group repeats with surrounding polymorphisms. We show that the human genome contains at least 25,000 complex variation clusters, most of which span over 120 bp and contain five or more TRs. Resolving the sequence of entire variation clusters instead of individually genotyping constituent TRs leads to a more accurate analysis of these regions and enables us to profile variation that would have been missed otherwise. We also share the trexplorer.broadinstitute.org portal which allows anyone to search, visualize, and download the catalog along with variation clusters and annotations.

genomics↗

Exploring penetrance of clinically relevant variants in over 800,000 humans from the Genome Aggregation Database

Incomplete penetrance, or absence of disease phenotype in an individual with a disease-associated variant, is a major challenge in variant interpretation. Studying individuals with apparent incomplete penetrance can shed light on underlying drivers of altered phenotype penetrance. Here, we investigate clinically relevant variants from ClinVar in 807,162 individuals from the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD), demonstrating improved representation in gnomAD version 4. We then conduct a comprehensive case-by-case assessment of 734 predicted loss of function variants (pLoF) in 77 genes associated with severe, early-onset, highly penetrant haploinsufficient disease. We identified explanations for the presumed lack of disease manifestation in 701 of the variants (95%). Individuals with unexplained lack of disease manifestation in this set of disorders rarely occur, underscoring the need and power of deep case-by-case assessment presented here to minimize false assignments of disease risk, particularly in unaffected individuals with higher rates of secondary properties that result in rescue.

genomics↗

The landscape of regional missense mutational intolerance quantified from 125,748 exomes

Missense variants can have a range of functional impacts depending on factors such as the specific amino acid substitution and location within the gene. To interpret their deleteriousness, studies have sought to identify regions within genes that are specifically intolerant of missense variation. Here, we leverage the patterns of rare missense variation in 730,947 exome sequenced individuals in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD v4.1.1) against a null mutational model to identify transcripts with regional differences in missense constraint. Missense-depleted regions are enriched for ClinVar pathogenic variants, de novo missense variants from individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders, and complex trait heritability. Following ClinGen calibration recommendations for the ACMG/AMP variant classification guidelines, we establish that variants within regions with <36% of their expected missense variation achieve moderate support for pathogenicity. We integrate this regional constraint measure into a missense deleteriousness metric (named MPC) that effectively stratifies rare and de novo missense variants in individuals with early-onset developmental conditions from controls. These results provide additional tools to aid in missense variant interpretation.

genomics↗

Insights from a genome-wide truth set of tandem repeat variation

Tools for genotyping tandem repeats (TRs) from short read sequencing data have improved significantly over the past decade. Extensive comparisons of these tools to gold standard diagnostic methods like RP-PCR have confirmed their accuracy for tens to hundreds of well-studied loci. However, a scarcity of high-quality orthogonal truth data limited our ability to measure tool accuracy for the millions of other loci throughout the genome. To address this, we developed a TR truth set based on the Synthetic Diploid Benchmark (SynDip). By identifying the subset of insertions and deletions that represent TR expansions or contractions with motifs between 2 and 50 base pairs, we obtained accurate genotypes for 139,795 pure and 6,845 interrupted repeats in a single diploid sample. Our approach did not require running existing genotyping tools on short read or long read sequencing data and provided an alternative, more accurate view of tandem repeat variation. We applied this truth set to compare the strengths and weaknesses of widely-used tools for genotyping TRs, evaluated the completeness of existing genome-wide TR catalogs, and explored the properties of tandem repeat variation throughout the genome. We found that, without filtering, ExpansionHunter had higher accuracy than GangSTR and HipSTR over a wide range of motifs and allele sizes. Also, when errors in allele size occurred, ExpansionHunter tended to overestimate expansion sizes, while GangSTR tended to underestimate them. Additionally, we saw that widely-used TR catalogs miss between 16% and 41% of variant loci in the truth set. These results suggest that genome-wide analyses would benefit from genotyping a larger set of loci as well as further tool development that builds on the strengths of current algorithms. To that end, we developed a new catalog of 2.8 million loci that captures 95% of variant loci in the truth set, and created a modified version of ExpansionHunter that runs 2 to 3x faster than the original while producing the same output.

genomics↗

Inferring compound heterozygosity from large-scale exome sequencing data

Recessive diseases arise when both the maternal and the paternal copies of a gene are impacted by a damaging genetic variant in the affected individual. When a patient carries two different potentially causal variants in a gene for a given disorder, accurate diagnosis requires determining that these two variants occur on different copies of the chromosome (i.e., are in trans) rather than on the same copy (i.e. in cis). However, current approaches for determining phase, beyond parental testing, are limited in clinical settings. We developed a strategy for inferring phase for rare variant pairs within genes, leveraging genotypes observed in exome sequencing data from the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD v2, n=125,748). When applied to trio data where phase can be determined by transmission, our approach estimates phase with 95.7% accuracy and remains accurate even for very rare variants (allele frequency < 1x10-4). We also correctly phase 95.9% of variant pairs in a set of 293 patients with Mendelian conditions carrying presumed causal compound heterozygous variants. We provide a public resource of phasing estimates from gnomAD, including phasing estimates for coding variants across the genome and counts per gene of rare variants in trans, that can aid interpretation of rare co-occurring variants in the context of recessive disease.

genomics↗

Development and application of a computable genotype model in the GA4GH Variation Representation Specification

As the diversity of genomic variation data increases with our growing understanding of the role of variation in health and disease, it is critical to develop standards for precise inter-system exchange of these data for research and clinical applications. The Global Alliance for Genomics and Health (GA4GH) Variation Representation Specification (VRS) meets this need through a technical terminology and information model for disambiguating and concisely representing variation concepts. Here we discuss the recent Genotype model in VRS, which may be used to represent the allelic composition of a genetic locus. We demonstrate the use of the Genotype model and the constituent Haplotype model for the precise and interoperable representation of pharmacogenomic diplotypes, HGVS variants, and VCF records using VRS and discuss how this can be leveraged to enable interoperable exchange and search operations between assayed variation and genomic knowledgebases.

bioinformatics↗

Discordant genotype calls across technology platforms elucidate variants with systematic errors in next-generation sequencing

Large-scale next-generation sequencing datasets have been transformative for informing clinical variant interpretation and as reference panels for statistical and population genetic efforts. While such resources are often treated as ground truth, we find that in widely used reference datasets such as the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD), some variants pass gold standard filters yet are systematically different in their genotype calls across genotype discovery approaches. The inclusion of such discordant sites in study designs involving multiple genotype discovery strategies could bias results and lead to false-positive hits in association studies due to technological artifacts rather than a true relationship to the phenotype. Here, we describe this phenomenon of discordant genotype calls across genotype discovery approaches, characterize the error mode of wrong calls, provide a blacklist of discordant sites identified in gnomAD that should be treated with caution in analyses, and present a metric and machine learning classifier trained on gnomAD data to identify likely discordant variants in other datasets. We find that different genotype discovery approaches have different sets of variants at which this problem occurs but that there are characteristic variant features that can be used to predict discordant behavior. Discordant sites are largely shared across ancestry groups, though different populations are powered for discovery of different variants. We find that the most common error mode is that of a variant being heterozygous for one approach and homozygous for the other, with heterozygous in the genomes and homozygous reference in the exomes making up the majority of miscalls.

genomics↗

Genetic Sex Validation for Sample Tracking in Clinical Testing

BackgroundNext generation DNA sequencing (NGS) has been rapidly adopted by clinical testing laboratories for detection of germline and somatic genetic variants. The complexity of sample processing in a clinical DNA sequencing laboratory creates multiple opportunities for sample identification errors, demanding stringent quality control procedures. MethodsWe utilized DNA genotyping via a 96-SNP PCR panel applied at sample acquisition in comparison to the final sequence, for tracking of sample identity throughout the sequencing pipeline. The 96-SNP PCR panels inclusion of sex SNPs also provides a mechanism for a genotype-based comparison to recorded sex at sample collection for identification. This approach was implemented in the clinical genomic testing pathways, in the multi-center Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Phase III program ResultsWe identified 110 inconsistencies from 25,015 (0.44%) clinical samples, when comparing the 96-SNP PCR panel data to the test requisition-provided sex. The 96-SNP PCR panel genetic sex predictions were confirmed using additional SNP sites in the sequencing data or high-density hybridization-based genotyping arrays. Results identified clerical errors, samples from transgender participants and stem cell or bone marrow transplant patients and undetermined sample mix-ups. ConclusionThe 96-SNP PCR panel provides a cost-effective, robust tool for tracking samples within DNA sequencing laboratories, while the ability to predict sex from genotyping data provides an additional quality control measure for all procedures, beginning with sample collections. While not sufficient to detect all sample mix-ups, the inclusion of genetic versus reported sex matching can give estimates of the rate of errors in sample collection systems.

genomics↗

REViewer: Haplotype-resolved visualization of read alignments in and around tandem repeats

BackgroundExpansions of short tandem repeats are the cause of many neurogenetic disorders including familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Huntington disease, and many others. Multiple methods have been recently developed that can identify repeat expansions in whole genome or exome sequencing data. Despite the widely-recognized need for visual assessment of variant calls in clinical settings, current computational tools lack the ability to produce such visualizations for repeat expansions. Expanded repeats are difficult to visualize because they correspond to large insertions relative to the reference genome and involve many misaligning and ambiguously aligning reads. ResultsWe implemented REViewer, a computational method for visualization of sequencing data in genomic regions containing long repeat expansions. To generate a read pileup, REViewer reconstructs local haplotype sequences and distributes reads to these haplotypes in a way that is most consistent with the fragment lengths and evenness of read coverage. To create appropriate training materials for onboarding new users, we performed a concordance study involving 12 scientists involved in STR research. We used the results of this study to create a user guide that describes the basic principles of using REViewer as well as a guide to the typical features of read pileups that correspond to low confidence repeat genotype calls. Additionally, we demonstrated that REViewer can be used to annotate clinically-relevant repeat interruptions by comparing visual assessment results of 44 FMR1 repeat alleles with the results of triplet repeat primed PCR. For 38 of these alleles, the results of visual assessment were consistent with triplet repeat primed PCR. ConclusionsRead pileup plots generated by REViewer offer an intuitive way to visualize sequencing data in regions containing long repeat expansions. Laboratories can use REViewer to assess the quality of repeat genotype calls as well as to visually detect interruptions or other imperfections in the repeat sequence and the surrounding flanking regions.

bioinformatics↗

Mitochondrial DNA variation across 56,434 individuals in gnomAD

Databases of allele frequency are extremely helpful for evaluating clinical variants of unknown significance; however, until now, genetic databases such as the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) have ignored the mitochondrial genome (mtDNA). Here we present a pipeline to call mtDNA variants that addresses three technical challenges: (i) detecting homoplasmic and heteroplasmic variants, present respectively in all or a fraction of mtDNA molecules, (ii) circular mtDNA genome, and (iii) misalignment of nuclear sequences of mitochondrial origin (NUMTs). We observed that mtDNA copy number per cell varied across gnomAD cohorts and influenced the fraction of NUMT-derived false-positive variant calls, which can account for the majority of putative heteroplasmies. To avoid false positives, we excluded samples prone to NUMT misalignment (few mtDNA copies per cell), cell line artifacts (many mtDNA copies per cell), or with contamination and we reported variants with heteroplasmy greater than 10%. We applied this pipeline to 56,434 whole genome sequences in the gnomAD v3.1 database that includes individuals of European (58%), African (25%), Latino (10%), and Asian (5%) ancestry. Our gnomAD v3.1 release contains population frequencies for 10,850 unique mtDNA variants at more than half of all mtDNA bases. Importantly, we report frequencies within each nuclear ancestral population and mitochondrial haplogroup. Homoplasmic variants account for most variant calls (98%) and unique variants (85%). We observed that 1/250 individuals carry a pathogenic mtDNA variant with heteroplasmy above 10%. These mitochondrial population allele frequencies are publicly available at gnomad.broadinstitute.org and will aid in diagnostic interpretation and research studies.

genomics↗

Genomic Considerations for FHIR; eMERGE Implementation Lessons

Structured representation of clinical genetic results is necessary for advancing precision medicine. The Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Networks Phase III program initially used a commercially developed XML message format for standardized and structured representation of genetic results for electronic health record (EHR) integration. In a desire to move towards a standard representation, the network created a new standardized format based upon Health Level Seven Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (HL7 FHIR), to represent clinical genomics results. These new standards improve the utility of HL7 FHIR as an international healthcare interoperability standard for management of genetic data from patients. This work advances the establishment of standards that are being designed for broad adoption in the current health information technology landscape.

genomics↗

ClinGen Expert Clinical Validity Curation of 164 Hearing Loss Gene-Disease Pairs

PurposeProper interpretation of genomic variants is critical to successful medical decision making based on genetic testing results. A fundamental prerequisite to accurate variant interpretation is the clear understanding of the clinical validity of gene-disease relationships. The Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) has developed a semi-quantitative framework to assign clinical validity to gene-disease relationships. MethodsThe ClinGen Hearing Loss Gene Curation Expert Panel (HL GCEP) uses this framework to perform evidence-based curations of genes present on testing panels from 17 clinical laboratories in the Genetic Testing Registry. The HL GCEP curated and reviewed 142 genes and 164 gene-disease pairs, including 105 nonsyndromic and 59 syndromic forms of hearing loss. ResultsThe final outcome included 82 Definitive (50%), 12 Strong (7%), 25 Moderate (15%), 32 Limited (20%), 10 Disputed (6%), and 3 Refuted (2%) classifications. The summary of each curation is date stamped with the HL GCEP approval, is live, and will be kept up-to-date on the ClinGen website (https://search.clinicalgenome.org/kb/gene-validity). ConclusionThis gene curation approach serves to optimize the clinical sensitivity of genetic testing while reducing the rate of uncertain or ambiguous test results caused by the interrogation of genes with insufficient evidence of a disease link.

genomics↗

Harmonizing Clinical Sequencing And Interpretation For The eMERGE III Network

BackgroundThe eMERGE III Network was tasked with harmonizing genetic testing protocols linking multiple sites and investigators.\n\nMethodsDNA capture panels targeting 109 genes and 1551 variants were constructed by two clinical sequencing centers for analysis of 25,000 participant DNA samples collected at 11 sites where samples were linked to patients with electronic health records. Each step from sample collection, data generation, interpretation, reporting, delivery and storage, were developed and validated in CAP/CLIA settings and harmonized across sequencing centers.\n\nResultsA compliant and secure network was built and enabled ongoing review and reconciliation of clinical interpretations while maintaining communication and data sharing between investigators. Mechanisms for sustained propagation and growth of the network were established. An interim data freeze representing 15,574 sequenced subjects, informed the assay performance for a range of variant types, the rate of return of results for different phenotypes and the frequency of secondary findings. Practical obstacles for implementation and scaling of clinical and research findings were identified and addressed. The eMERGE protocols and tools established are now available for widespread dissemination.\n\nConclusionsThis study established processes for different sequencing sites to harmonize the technical and interpretive aspects of sequencing tests, a critical achievement towards global standardization of genomic testing. The network established experience in the return of results and the rate of secondary findings across diverse biobank populations. Furthermore, the eMERGE network has accomplished integration of structured genomic results into multiple electronic health record systems, setting the stage for clinical decision support to enable genomic medicine.

genomics↗

Evaluating the clinical validity of gene-disease associations: an evidence-based framework developed by the Clinical Genome Resource

With advances in genomic sequencing technology, the number of reported gene-disease relationships has rapidly expanded. However, the evidence supporting these claims varies widely, confounding accurate evaluation of genomic variation in a clinical setting. Despite the critical need to differentiate clinically valid relationships from less well-substantiated relationships, standard guidelines for such evaluation do not currently exist. The NIH-funded Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) has developed a framework to define and evaluate the clinical validity of gene-disease pairs across a variety of Mendelian disorders. In this manuscript we describe a proposed framework to evaluate relevant genetic and experimental evidence supporting or contradicting a gene-disease relationship, and the subsequent validation of this framework using a set of representative gene-disease pairs. The framework provides a semi-quantitative measurement for the strength of evidence of a gene-disease relationship which correlates to a qualitative classification: \"Definitive\", \"Strong\", \"Moderate\", \"Limited\", \"No Reported Evidence\" or \"Conflicting Evidence.\" Within the ClinGen structure, classifications derived using this framework are reviewed and confirmed or adjusted based on clinical expertise of appropriate disease experts. Detailed guidance for utilizing this framework and access to the curation interface is available on our website. This evidence-based, systematic method to assess the strength of gene-disease relationships will facilitate more knowledgeable utilization of genomic variants in clinical and research settings.

genetics↗