Re, L. A. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2025

Revisions to the Gliophorus irrigatus complex (Agaricales, Hygrophoraceae, Gliophorus, section Unguinosae) including a new waxcap, G. alboviscidus, from the UK but detected globally via soil eDNA, two new species from eastern North America, G. fumosus and G. parafumosus, plus a new species, G. calunus, and a new combination of Hygrophorus subaromaticus in Gliophorus from western North America.

Here we report the discovery of four new agaricoid fungi in the Gliophorus irrigatus complex of the family Hygrophoraceae. Gliophorus alboviscidus sp. nov. from the UK is morphologically identical to the European G. irrigatus (which we neotypify), except that its basidiome is white or pale Buff coloured vs brownish grey. Two new species from eastern North America, Gliophorus fumosus sp. nov. (provisional name Gliophorus sp. irrigatus-IN01), and Gliophorus parafumosus sp. nov (previously labelled G. irrigatus) resemble G. irrigatus s.s. in colour and morphology but their distributions are restricted to North America. Phylogenetic reconstruction revealed that these samples form distinct clades, with >10% ITS sequence divergence from European G. irrigatus s.s. and from each other. Though G. alboviscidus sp. nov. is currently known only from two locations in the UK, searches for related sequences from eDNA (environmental DNA) sequence repositories (UNITE/GlobalFungi) suggested that this species is more widely distributed in Eurasia. G. fumosus and G. parafumosus sequences from eastern North America were divergent from both European G. irrigatus and G. alboviscidus; both were more closely related to another species with a strong odour and white/Buff basidiomes from northwestern North America, Hygrophorus subaromaticus for which we sequenced the holotype and recombine in the genus Gliophorus. We also describe a new species from northwestern North America, G. calunus sp. nov. (provisional name Gliophorus sp. irrigatus-CA01), based on vouchered specimens photographed and sequenced by an paraprofessional group, CA FUNDIS. We highlight the importance of citizen scientist groups and paraprofessionals in documenting macrofungal species and their distributions via databases such as iNaturalist, Mushroom Observer and MycoMap. Further, we discuss reasons eDNA distributions are often larger than known distributions of basidiomes, including G. alboviscidus and G. fumosus.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2024

Insects visit Fusarium xyrophilum pseudoflowers on the host Xyris surinamensis (Xyridaceae) and carry fungal DNA on their bodies

The fungus Fusarium xyrophilum produces flower-like structures (i.e., pseudoflowers) that were recently discovered on yellow-eyed grasses (Xyris spp.) in Guyana. It is unknown whether these pseudoflowers, which are composed entirely of fungal tissue, are true mimics that attract insects as a means of fungal dispersal. We evaluated the potential of F. xyrophilum to affect insect visitation patterns to flowers and pseudoflowers by 1) documenting insect visitation to X. surinamensis in Guyana, 2) measuring the presence of F. xyrophilum DNA on insects, and 3) evaluating fluorescence and volatile production on flowers and pseudoflowers. We report for the first time Vespidae, Formicidae, Salticidae, Acrididae, and Tetrigidae visiting Xyris. Diverse insects, including Conocephalini spp. (meadow katydids; Tettigoniidae), Camponotus spp. (carpenter ants; Formicidae), and a Geometridae sp. (geometer moths) were found to visit flowers and pseudoflowers. Fusarium xyrophilum DNA was detected on 3/12 (25%) of captured insect bodies using conventional and quantitative PCR. Volatiles produced in the field by pseudoflowers and flowers were similar, except for the presence of a sesquiterpene, putatively identified here as -gurjunene, which was detected both in F. xyrophilum pure cultures and field-collected pseudoflower samples, but not from flowers. The production of this sesquiterpene by F. xyrophilum and the fluorescence of X. surinamensis peduncles represent potential signals involved in insect attraction for this system. These observations, along with the overlap in insect visitors of flowers and pseudoflowers and the detection of F. xyrophilum DNA on insect bodies, are consistent with insect visitors being vectors of Xyris pollen and F. xyrophilum propagules between host plants.

ecology↗