Biology subjects

Rappoport, N.

Publications and source records attributed to Rappoport, N..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2018

NEMO: Cancer subtyping by integration of partial multi-omic data

Motivation: Cancer subtypes were usually defined based on molecular characterization of single omic data. Increasingly, measurements of multiple omic profiles for the same cohort are available. Defining cancer subtypes using multi-omic data may improve our understanding of cancer, and suggest more precise treatment for patients.\n\nResults: We present NEMO (NEighborhood based Multi-Omics clustering), a novel algorithm for multiomics clustering. Importantly, NEMO can be applied to partial datasets in which some patients have data for only a subset of the omics, without performing data imputation. In extensive testing on ten cancer datasets spanning 3168 patients, NEMO outperformed nine state-of-the-art multi-omics clustering algorithms on full data and on imputed partial data. On some of the partial data tests, PVC, a multiview algorithm, performed better, but it is limited to two omics and to positive partial data. Finally, we demonstrate the advantage of NEMO in detailed analysis of partial data of AML patients. NEMO is fast and much simpler than existing multi-omics clustering algorithms, and avoids iterative optimization.\n\nAvailability: Code for NEMO and for reproducing all NEMO results in this paper is in github.\n\nContact: rshamir@tau.ac.il\n\nSupplementary information: Supplementary data are available online.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2018

Multi-omic and multi-view clustering algorithms: review and cancer benchmark

High throughput experimental methods developed in recent years have been used to collect large biomedical omics datasets. Clustering of such datasets has proven invaluable for biological and medical research, and helped reveal structure in data from several domains. Such analysis is often based on investigation of a single omic. The decreasing cost and development of additional high throughput methods now enable measurement of multi-omic data. Clustering multi-omic data has the potential to reveal further systems-level insights, but raises computational and biological challenges. Here we review algorithms for multi-omics clustering, and discuss key issues in applying these algorithms. Our review covers methods developed specifically for multi-omic data as well as generic multi-view methods developed in the machine learning community for joint clustering of multiple data types.\n\nIn addition, using cancer data from TCGA, we perform an extensive benchmark spanning ten different cancer types, providing the first systematic benchmark comparison of leading multi-omics and multiview clustering algorithms. The results highlight several key questions regarding the use of single-vs. multi-omics, the choice of clustering strategy, the power of generic multi-view methods and the use of approximated p-values for gauging solution quality. Due to the rapidly increasing use of multi-omics data, these issues may be important for future progress in the field.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2017

Creating ethnicity-specific reference intervals for lab tests from EHR data

The results of clinical lab tests are an essential component of medical decision-making. To guide interpretation, test results are returned with reference intervals defined by the range in which 95% of values occur in healthy individuals. Clinical laboratories often set their own reference intervals to accommodate local population and instruments variations. This approach is costly and can be biased. We describe a novel data-driven method for using electronic health record data to extract healthy patients information to define reference intervals. We found that the distributions of many clinical lab tests differ among self-identified racial and ethnic groups (SIREs) in healthy patients. Finally, we derived SIRE-specific reference intervals and provide evidence that these intervals have clinical prognostic value. Specifically, we show that for two lab tests, serum creatinine level and hemoglobin A1C, SIRE-specific reference intervals are more predictive for need for dialysis and development type 2 diabetes than existing reference intervals.\n\nOne Sentence SummaryA novel method for defining population-specific reference intervals of common clinical laboratory tests from electronical health records has better prognostic value than existing reference intervals.

bioinformatics↗