bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Raine, N. E.

Publications and source records attributed to Raine, N. E..

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Welcome to Hotel Hymenoptera: monitoring cavity-nesting bee and wasp distribution and their trophic interactions using community science and metabarcoding

Essential ecosystem services are provided by many interactions, including plant-pollinator, predator-prey, and host-parasitoid. These services support food and natural systems through pollination and pest control, however they are challenging to qualify, and previous observational studies may underestimate their complexity. The cavity nesting Hymenoptera are a good example showing all these three interactions and they can be monitored using trap nests. For this study, trap nests were installed at schools across Canada by community scientists to investigate cavity-nesting bee and wasp distributions and interactions. DNA metabarcoding was used to identify the occupants and their food sources. New bee and wasp distributions were found that might be the result of previous under-sampling or recent range expansions. Detailed bipartite and tripartite networks describing species interactions suggest some novel bee, wasp, and parasite associations. These results encourage further investigation into these interactions using molecular methods as detailed range maps and networks provide information to natural historians and conservationists alike.

ecology↗

Quantifying exposure of bumblebee (Bombus spp.) queens to pesticide residues when hibernating in agricultural soils

Exposure to pesticides is a major threat to bumblebee (Bombus spp.) health. In temperate regions, queens of many bumblebee species hibernate underground for several months, putting them at potentially high risk of exposure to soil contaminants. The extent to which bumblebees are exposed to residues in agricultural soils during hibernation is currently unknown, which limits our understanding of the full pesticide exposome for bumblebees throughout their lifecycle. To generate field exposure estimates for overwintering bumblebee queens to pesticide residues, we sampled soils from areas corresponding to suitable likely hibernation sites at six apple orchards and 13 diversified farms throughout Southern Ontario (Canada) in fall 2019-2020. Detectable levels of pesticides were found in 65 of 66 soil samples analysed for multi-pesticide residues (UPLC-MS/MS). A total of 53 active ingredients (AIs) were detected in soils, including 27 fungicides, 13 insecticides, and 13 herbicides. Overall, the frequency of detection, residue levels (median = 37.8 vs. 2.2 ng/g), and number of pesticides per sample (mean = 12.3 vs. 4.3 AIs) were highest for orchard soils compared to soils from diversified farms. Ninety-one percent of samples contained multiple residues, including mixtures of insecticides and fungicides that might lead to synergistic effects. Up to 29 different AIs were detected per soil sample. Our results suggest that when hibernating in agricultural areas, bumblebee queens are very likely to be exposed to a wide range of pesticide residues in soil. Our study indicates the importance of empirically testing the potential effects of pesticide residues in soils for hibernating bumblebee queens, using field exposure data such as those generated here. The differences in exposure that we detected between cropping systems can also be used to better inform regulations that govern the use of agricultural pesticides, notably in apple orchards.

ecology↗

Safeguarding pollinators requires specific habitat prescriptions and substantially more land area than current policy suggests

Habitat loss and fragmentation are major drivers of global pollinator declines, yet even after recent unprecedented periods of anthropogenic land-use intensification the amount of habitat needed to support pollinators remains unknown. Here we use comprehensive datasets to determine the extent and amount of habitat needed. Safeguarding wild bee communities in a Canadian landscape requires 11.6-16.7% land-cover from a diverse range of habitats (~1.8-3.6x current policy guidelines), irrespective of whether conservation aims are enhancing species richness or abundance. Sensitive habitats, like tallgrass woodlands and wetlands, were important predictors of bee biodiversity. Conservation strategies that under-estimate the extent of habitat, spatial scale and specific habitat needs of functional guilds are unlikely to protect bee communities and the essential pollination services they provide to crops and wild plants. One sentence summarySafeguarding wild bee communities requires 11.6-16.7% of the area in common North American landscapes to provide targeted habitat prescriptions for different functional guilds over a variety of spatial scales.

ecology↗

Neonicotinoid exposure affects foraging, nesting, and reproductive success of ground-nesting solitary bees

Despite their indispensable role in food production1,2, insect pollinators are threatened by multiple environmental stressors, including pesticide exposure2-4. Although honeybees are important, most pollinating insect species are wild, solitary, ground-nesting bees1,4-6 that are inadequately represented by honeybee-centric regulatory pesticide risk assessment frameworks7,8. Here, for the first time, we evaluate the effects of realistic exposure to systemic insecticides (imidacloprid, thiamethoxam or chlorantraniliprole) on a ground-nesting bee species in a semi-field experiment. Hoary squash bees (Eucera (Peponapis) pruinosa) provide essential pollination services to North American pumpkin and squash crops9-14 and commonly nest within cropping areas10, placing them at risk of exposure to pesticides in soil8,10, nectar and pollen15,16. Hoary squash bees exposed to an imidacloprid-treated crop initiated 85% fewer nests, left 84% more pollen unharvested, and produced 89% fewer offspring than untreated controls. We found no measurable impact on squash bees from exposure to thiamethoxam- or chlorantraniliprole-treated crops. Our results demonstrate important sublethal effects of field-realistic exposure to a soil-applied neonicotinoid (imidacloprid) on the behaviour and reproductive success of a ground-nesting solitary bee. To prevent potential declines in ground-nesting bee populations and associated impoverishment of crop pollination services, soil must be considered a possible route of pesticide exposure for bees, and restrictions on soil-applied insecticides may be justified.

ecology↗

Acute oral toxicity and risks of exposure to the neonicotinoid thiamethoxam, and other classes of systemic insecticide, for the Common Eastern Bumblebee (Bombus impatiens)

The Common Eastern Bumblebee (Bombus impatiens) is native to North America with an expanding range across Eastern Canada and the USA. This species is commercially produced primarily for greenhouse crop pollination and is a common and abundant component of the wild bumblebee fauna in agricultural, suburban and urban landscapes. However, there is a dearth of pesticide toxicity information about North American bumblebees. The present study determines the acute oral toxicity (48-hour LD50) of cyantraniliprole (>0.54 g/bee), flupyradifurone (>1.7 g/bee), sulfoxaflor (0.0194 g/bee), and thiamethoxam (0.0012 g/bee). Compared with published honey bee (Apis mellifera) LD50 values, the present study shows that thiamethoxam and sulfoxaflor are 4.2x and 7.5x more acutely toxic to B. impatiens, whereas flupyradifurone is more acutely toxic to A. mellifera. The current rule of thumb for toxicity extrapolation beyond the honey bee as a model species, termed 10x safety factor, may be sufficient for bumblebee acute oral toxicity. A comparison of three risk assessment equations suggested that the Standard Risk Approach (SRA) and Fixed Dose Risk Approach (FDRA) provide more nuanced levels of risk evaluation compared to the European Plant Protection Organization (EPPO) Hazard Quotient (HQ), primarily because SRA and FDRA take into account real world variability in pollen and nectar pesticide residues and the chances that bees are exposed to them.

pharmacology and toxicology↗

Captive-reared migratory monarch butterflies show natural orientation when released in the wild

Eastern North American migratory monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) have faced sharp declines over the last two decades. Although captive rearing has been used as an important tool for engaging the public and supplementing conservation efforts, a recent study that tested monarchs in a flight simulator suggested that captive-reared monarchs lose their capacity to orient southward during fall migration to their Mexican overwintering sites. We raised offspring of wild-caught monarchs on swamp milkweed (Asclepias incarnata) and, after eclosion, individuals were either tested in a flight simulator or radio-tracked in the wild using array of over 100 automated telemetry towers. While only 33% (7/39) of monarchs tested in the flight simulator showed strong southeast to southwest orientation, 97% (28/29) of the radio-tracked individuals were detected by automated towers south or southeast of the release site, up to 200 km away. Our results suggest that, though captive rearing of monarch butterflies may cause temporary disorientation, proper orientation is likely re-established after exposure to natural skylight cues.

ecology↗

Risks of exposure to systemic insecticides in agricultural soil in Ontario, Canada for the hoary squash bee (Peponapis pruinosa) and other ground-nesting bee species

Insecticide exposure is an environmental factor of concern relating to pollinator health. Recent increases in use of systemic insecticides, particularly neonicotinoids, have led to considerable research into the potential impacts for bees of exposure to these insecticide residues via the nectar and pollen of treated crops or contaminated wild flowers. However, although the majority of bee species are ground-nesting, the risk of exposure to insecticides in soil has not yet been evaluated. Here we use the hoary squash bee (Peponapis pruinosa) as a model system to provide the first evaluation of the risk of exposure to insecticide residues in soil to ground-nesting solitary bee species. The evaluation assessed agrochemical residues from the nectar, pollen and soil from Cucurbita-crops (e.g. squash and pumpkin) grown in southern Ontario in 2016, and soil insecticide residue data collected from field crops by the Ontario government. Systemic insecticide residues were rarely detected in the nectar and pollen of Cucurbita-crops in 2016, and hazard assessment deemed these potential routes of exposure to be non-hazardous for honey bee lethal dose endpoints. In contrast, quantifiable pesticide residues were frequently detected in soil suggesting this route of exposure to be hazardous for honey bee lethal dose endpoints, leading to further assessment using probabilistic risk assessments. Concentrations of clothianidin, imidacloprid, thiamethoxam (neonicotinoid insecticides) and chlorantraniliprole (an anthranilic diamide insecticide) in soil samples were plotted to produce an environmental exposure distribution for each insecticide. A honey bee LC50 and a solitary bee LC50 endpoint were converted to exposure endpoints using the amount of soil excavated by hoary squash bees during nest construction, for both acute and chronic exposure scenarios. The probability of exceedance of each exposure endpoint was calculated and compared to an acceptable risk threshold (i.e. 5% exceedance). In the acute exposure scenario, risk to hoary squash bees was below acceptable threshold levels for all residues evaluated using the honey bee LC50, but exceeded the threshold for clothianidin and imidacloprid using the solitary bee LC50. In the chronic exposure scenario, risk from exposure to clothianidin and imidacloprid exceeded the threshold for both the honey bee and solitary bee LC50s, and for chlorantraniliprole risk only exceeded the threshold for the solitary bee LC50. Using the hoary squash bee as a model, the wider implications for other ground-nesting bees that pollinate crops was explored using insecticide residues from soil samples taken from Ontario field crops. Probabilistic risk assessments suggest that risk to ground-nesting bees is high from clothianidin residues in soils, even when exposure is acute, and substantial for both thiamethoxam and imidacloprid under chronic exposure scenarios. These results demonstrate the urgent need to consider direct exposure to pesticides in soil for ground-nesting bees as part of risk assessments and provides a potential model for evaluating risk from this type of exposure.

ecology↗