bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Ragland, J. D.

Publications and source records attributed to Ragland, J. D..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Model-based EEG phenotyping uncovers distinct neurocomputational mechanisms underlying learning impairments across psychopathologies

BackgroundMajor depressive disorder (MDD), bipolar disorder (BP), and schizophrenia (SCZ) involve learning impairments with poorly understood mechanisms. Understanding both the similarities and differences in these mechanisms is important to guide the development of new, targeted interventions. Methods255 participants diagnosed with MDD (n=54), BP (n=47), SCZ (n=67) or without any diagnoses (CTRL; n=87) performed an associative learning task. Computational modeling quantified the mechanistic interplay between working memory (WM) and reinforcement learning (RL). The latent RL and WM signatures in the EEG dynamics showed shared and distinct neurocognitive mechanisms underlying learning. ResultsAll clinical groups showed learning impairments at the behavioral level. Model-based EEG analyses linked these impairments to distinct patterns in the dynamic interplay between latent RL and WM mechanisms, contrasting with the typical patterns observed in CTRL. SCZ was characterized by reduced neural markers of WM, weakening the cooperative influence of WM onto RL (reduced WM recruitment), and reduced integration of negative feedback. Conversely, MDD was characterized by reduced reciprocal influence of RL onto WM, reducing the tendency to upregulate WM contribution with reward history (impaired WM management). Finally, BP was characterized by deficits in both WM and RL recruitment, along with higher WM decay. ConclusionsBehavioral learning impairments that appear similar across clinical groups can be linked to distinct neurocognitive mechanisms via integrative neurocomputational modeling. Our approach provides insights into the interplay of underlying learning mechanisms and how they manifest differently across psychopathologies. CitationThis manuscript is a preprint version of the later manuscript accepted for publication in Biological Psychiatry: Global Open Science. The content may differ from the final published version following peer review and editorial revisions. Ging-Jehli, N.R., Rac-Lubashevsky, R., Bera, K., Roberts, A., Loder, A., Boudewyn, M.A., Carter, C.S., Erickson, M., Gold, J., Luck, S.J., Ragland, J.D., Yonelinas, A.P., MacDonald III, A.W., Barch, D.M., & Frank, M.J. (2025). Model-based EEG phenotyping uncovers distinct neurocomputational mechanisms underlying learning impairments across psychopathologies. Preprint at bioRxiv.

pathology↗

Dynamic Reorganization of the Frontal Parietal Network During Cognitive Control and Episodic Memory

Higher cognitive functioning is supported by adaptive reconfiguration of large-scale functional brain networks. Cognitive control (CC), which plays a vital role in flexibly guiding cognition and behavior in accordance with our goals, supports a range of executive functions via distributed brain networks. These networks process information dynamically and can be represented as functional connectivity changes between network elements.\n\nUsing graph theory, we explored context-dependent network reorganization in 56 healthy adults performing fMRI tasks from two cognitive domains that varied in CC and episodic-memory demands. We examined whole-brain modular structure during the DPX task, which engages proactive CC in the frontal-parietal cognitive control network (FPN), and the RiSE task, which manipulates CC demands at encoding and retrieval during episodic-memory processing, and engages FPN, the medial-temporal lobe and other memory related networks in a context dependent manner.\n\nAnalyses revealed different levels of network integration and segregation. High CC conditions exhibited greater integration across tasks. Moreover, nodes associated with higher cognitive functioning displayed the greatest amount of dynamic module reorganization across tasks. Specifically, the FPN displayed a high level of segregation in the DPX task, where only demands for proactive control varied, and more complex network integration with default mode and salience networks in the RiSE task, where CC is differentially integrated during memory encoding and retrieval. These findings provide insight into how brain networks reorganize to support differing task contexts, suggesting that the FPN flexibly segregates during focused proactive control and integrates to support control in other domains such as episodic-memory.

neuroscience↗