bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Prigent, C.

Publications and source records attributed to Prigent, C..

2 recordsLinked to original sources
bioRxiv2020

CDC6 regulates mitotic CDK1 via cyclin B and not cyclin A and acts through a bona fide CDK inhibitor Xic1

The timing of the M-phase entry and its progression are precisely controlled by a CDC6-dependent mechanism that inhibits the major mitotic kinase CDK1, and, thus, regulates the dynamic of CDK1 during the M-phase. In this paper, we describe the differential regulation of the mitotic CDK1 dynamics by exogenous cyclin A or a non-degradable cyclin B added to the Xenopus laevis embryo cycling extracts. We showed that the variations in the level of cyclin B modify both CDK1 activity and the timing of the M-phase progression, while the cyclin A levels modify only CDK1 activity without changing the timing of the M-phase events. In consequence, CDC6 regulates the M-phase through endogenous cyclin B, but not cyclin A, which we demonstrated directly by the depletion of cyclin A, and the addition of CDC6 to the cycling extracts. Further, we showed, by p9 precipitation (p9 protein associates with Cyclin-Dependent Kinases, CDK), followed by the Western blotting that CDC6, and the bona fide CDK1 inhibitor Xic1, associate with CDK1 and/or another CDK present in Xenopus embryos, the CDK2. Finally, we demonstrated that the Xic1 temoprarily separates from the mitotic CDK complexes during the peak of CDK1 activity. These data show the differential coordination of the M-phase progression by CDK1/cyclin A and CDK1/cyclin B, confirm the critical role of the CDC6-dependent CDK1 inhibition in this process and show that CDC6 acts through the cyclin B- and not cyclin A/CDK complexes. This CDC6- and cyclin B-dependent mechanism may also depend on the precisely regulated association of Xic1 with the CDK complexes. We postulate that the dissociation of Xic1 from the CDK complexes allows the maximal activation of CDK1 during the M-phase.

cell biology↗
bioRxiv2020

Mitochondrial Aurora kinase A induces mitophagy by interacting with MAP1LC3 and Prohibitin 2

Epithelial and haematologic tumours often show the overexpression of the serine/threonine kinase AURKA. Recently, AURKA was shown to localise at mitochondria, where it regulates mitochondrial dynamics and ATP production. Here we define the molecular mechanisms of AURKA in regulating mitochondrial turnover by mitophagy. When overexpressed, AURKA induces the disappearance of Outer Mitochondrial Membrane proteins by the proteasome. Then, AURKA triggers the degradation of Inner Mitochondrial Membrane (IMM)/matrix proteins by interacting with core components of the autophagy pathway. On the IMM, the kinase forms a tripartite complex with MAP1LC3 and the mitophagy receptor PHB2. This complex is necessary to trigger mitophagy in a PARK2/Parkin-independent manner. The formation of the tripartite complex is induced by the phosphorylation of PHB2 on Ser39, which is required for MAP1LC3 to interact with PHB2. Last, treatment with the PHB2 ligand Xanthohumol blocks AURKA-induced mitophagy by destabilising the tripartite complex. This treatment also restores normal ATP production levels. Altogether, these data provide evidence for a previously undetected role of AURKA in promoting mitophagy through the interaction with PHB2 and MAP1LC3. This work paves the way to the use of function-specific pharmacological inhibitors to counteract the effects of the overexpression of AURKA in cancer.

cell biology↗