Biology subjects

Prendergast, L.

Publications and source records attributed to Prendergast, L..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2023

Overcoming PARP inhibitor resistance by inducing a homologous recombination repair defective phenotype with ATR, CHK1 and WEE1 inhibitors

PurposePARP inhibitors (PARPi) are effective in homologous recombination repair (HRR) defective (HRD) cancers. To (re)sensitise HRR proficient (HRP) tumours to PARPi combinations with other drugs are being explored. Our aim was to determine the mechanism underpinning the sensitisation to PARPi by inhibitors of cell cycle checkpoint kinase ATR, CHK1 and WEE1. Experimental designA panel of HRD and HRP cells (including matched BRCA1 or 2 mutant and corrected pairs) and ovarian cancer ascites cells were used. Rucaparib (PARPi) induced replication stress (RS) and HRR (immunofluorescence microscopy for {gamma}H2AX and RAD51 foci, respectively), cell cycle changes (flow cytometry), activation of ATR, CHK1 and WEE1 (Western Blot for pCHK1S345, pCHK1S296 and pCDK1Y15, respectively) and cytotoxicity (colony formation assay) was determined, followed by investigations of the impact on all of these parameters by inhibitors of ATR (VE-821, 1 M), CHK1 (PF-477736, 50 nM) and WEE1 (MK-1775, 100 nM). ResultsRucaparib induced RS (3 to10-fold), S-phase accumulation (2-fold) and ATR, CHK1 and WEE1 activation (up to 3-fold), and VE-821, PF-477736 and MK-1775 inhibited their targets and abrogated these rucaparib-induced cell cycle changes in HRP and HRD cells. Rucaparib activated HRR in HRP cells only and was (60-1,000x) more cytotoxic to HRD cells. VE-821, PF-477736 and MK-1775 blocked HRR and sensitised HRP but not HRD cells and primary ovarian ascites to rucaparib. ConclusionsOur data indicate that, rather than acting via abrogation of cell cycle checkpoints, ATR, CHK1 and WEE1 inhibitors cause an HRD phenotype and hence synthetic lethality with PARPi.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2023

Release of Histone H3K4-reading transcription factors from chromosomes in mitosis is independent of adjacent H3 phosphorylation

Histone modifications influence the recruitment of reader proteins to chromosomes to regulate events including transcription and cell division. The idea of a histone code, where particular combinations of modifications specify unique downstream functions, is widely accepted and can be demonstrated in vitro. For example, on synthetic peptides, phosphorylation of Histone H3 at threonine-3 (H3T3ph) prevents the binding of reader proteins that recognise trimethylation of the adjacent lysine-4 (H3K4me3), including the TAF3 component of TFIID. To study these combinatorial effects in cells, we analyzed the genome-wide distribution of H3T3ph and H3K4me3 during mitosis. We find that H3K4me3 hinders adjacent H3T3ph deposition in cells, and that the PHD domain of TAF3 can bind H3K4me3 in mitotic chromatin despite the presence of H3T3ph. Unlike in vitro, H3K4 readers are displaced from chromosomes in mitosis in Haspin-depleted cells lacking H3T3ph. H3T3ph is therefore unlikely to be responsible for transcriptional downregulation during cell division.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2018

Prevention of chromatin destabilization by FACT is crucial for malignant transformation

Expression of histone chaperone FACT is increased in tumors and associated with poor prognosis. We investigated why aggressive tumor cells need FACT using a model where FACT could be turned off and confirmed that while FACT is not essential for non-tumor cells, cells become dependent on FACT following oncogene-induced transformation. We compared the phenotypic and transcriptional changes induced by FACT loss and excluded a direct role for FACT in the transcription of genes essential for the viability of transformed cells. Moreover, we established that in immortalized and transformed cells, FACT has a weak negative effect on gene expression. At the same time, we observed a positive correlation between FACT enrichment and the rate of transcription, which was consistent with previous reports. To explain these puzzling observations, we hypothesized that FACT does not facilitate transcription elongation in transformed cells, but prevents nucleosome loss associated with transcription. Indeed, we observed destabilization of chromatin in immortalized and transformed cells upon FACT loss. Furthermore, transformed cells had less stable chromatin than non-transformed cells, which made them vulnerable to FACT loss. However, the mechanisms of cell death upon chromatin destabilization needs to be established. Our data suggest that malignant transformation is accompanied by general chromatin destabilization, and FACT prevents irredeemable chromatin loss.

cell biology↗