bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Prayag, A. S.

Publications and source records attributed to Prayag, A. S..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Within-subject rhythmicity and stability of hunger, satiety, and physiological markers: insights from a five-day laboratory study in time-isolation conditions

Hunger and satiety are interoceptions involved in the control of food intake. How they change across the day and from one day to the next, as well as their relationships with physiological parameters, remain poorly understood. In a five-day laboratory study, twenty healthy male participants (24.2 {+/-} 3.3 years) were given three meals per day (breakfast, lunch, dinner), at times based on each individuals internal time. Subjects had an 8-h sleep opportunity at night recorded by polysomnography, during which time they were exposed to 4 different light intensities (0, 3, 8, or 20 lux). Hunger and satiety were assessed before and after each meal. Heart rate was measured continuously and glucose levels were sampled every 15 minutes. We found that: 1) Hunger and satiety varied dynamically with the lowest levels at breakfast and the highest at lunch and dinner (p < 0.01); 2) the intensity of hunger and satiety remained stable across the five experimental days, and were subject-dependent; 3) Heart rate was higher after than before meals (p < 0.0001), and higher around breakfast than dinner; 4) Glycemia before and after meals was respectively stable throughout the day and over the study period; 5) Interoception was correlated with fluctuations in heart rate, glucose levels and sleep duration. Overall, our results reveal that hunger and satiety perception are individual characteristics. To better understand the role of interoception in food intake control, both hunger and satiety should be measured, but separately in their respective states.

physiology↗

Melatonin suppression by light involves different retinal photoreceptors in young and older adults

IntroductionAge-related sleep and circadian rhythm disturbances may be due to altered non-visual photoreception. Here, we investigated the temporal dynamics of light-induced melatonin suppression in young and older individuals. MethodsIn a within-subject design study, young and older participants were exposed for 60 minutes (0030-0130 at night) to 9 narrow-band lights (range: 420 to 620 nm). Plasma melatonin suppression was calculated at 15, 30, 45, and 60 min time intervals. Individual spectral sensitivity of melatonin suppression and photoreceptor contribution were predicted for each interval and age group. ResultsIn young participants, melanopsin solely drove melatonin suppression at all time intervals, with an invariant peak sensitivity at [~]485 nm established only after 15 minutes of light exposure. Conversely, in older participants, spectral light-driven melatonin suppression was best explained by a model combining melanopsin + L-cones with a stable peak sensitivity ([~]499 nm) at 30, 45, and 60 minutes of light exposure. ConclusionAging is associated with a distinct photoreceptor contribution to melatonin suppression by light. While in young adults melanopsin-only photoreception is a reliable predictor of melatonin suppression, in older individuals this process is jointly driven by melanopsin and L-cones. These findings offer new prospects for customizing light therapy for older individuals.

neuroscience↗