Biology subjects

Pollard, T. D.

Publications and source records attributed to Pollard, T. D..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2018

Phosphorylation of Arp2 is not essential for Arp2/3 complex activity in fission yeast

LeClaire et al. presented evidence that phosphorylation of three sites on the Arp2 subunit activates Arp2/3 complex to nucleate actin filaments. We mutated the homologous residues of Arp2 (Y198, T233 and T234) in the fission yeast genome to amino acids that preclude or mimic phosphorylation. Arp2/3 complex is essential for the viability of fission yeast, yet strains unable to phosphorylate these sites grew normally. Y198F/T233A/T234A Arp2 was only nonfunctional if GFP-tagged, as observed by LeClaire et al. in Drosophila cells. Replacing both T233 and T234 with aspartic acid was lethal, suggesting that phosphorylation might be inhibitory. Nevertheless, blocking phosphorylation at these sites had the same effect as mimicking it: slowing assembly of endocytic actin patches. Mass spectrometry revealed phosphorylation at a fourth conserved Arp2 residue, Y218, but both blocking and mimicking phosphorylation of Y218 only slowed actin patch assembly slightly. Therefore, phosphorylation of Y198, T233, T234 and Y218 is not required for the activity of fission yeast Arp2/3 complex.\n\nSummaryPrevious research concluded that phosphorylation at three sites on Arp2 is necessary to activate Arp2/3 complex. Epstein et al. make genomic substitutions blocking or mimicking phosphorylation to demonstrate that phosphorylation of these three sites does not regulate Arp2/3 complex in fission yeast.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2018

Gating Mechanisms during Actin Filament Elongation by Formins

Formins play an important role in the polymerization of unbranched actin filaments, and particular formins slow elongation by 5-95%. We studied the interactions between actin and the FH2 domains of formins Cdc12, Bni1 and mDia1 to understand the factors underlying their different rates of polymerization. All-atom molecular dynamics simulations revealed two factors that influence actin filament elongation and correlate with the rates of elongation. First, FH2 domains can sterically block the addition of new actin subunits. Second, FH2 domains flatten the helical twist of the terminal actin subunits, making the end less favorable for subunit addition. Coarse-grained simulations over longer time scales support these conclusions. The simulations show that filaments spend time in states that either allow or block elongation. The rate of elongation is a time-average of the degree to which the formin compromises subunit addition rather than the formin-actin complex literally being in open or closed states.

biophysics↗

bioRxiv2018

Mechanism of actin polymerization revealed by cryo-EM structures of actin filaments with three different bound nucleotides

We used electron cryo-micrographs to reconstruct actin filaments with bound AMPPNP ({beta},{gamma}-imidoadenosine 5-triphosphate, an ATP analog), ADP-Pi (ADP with inorganic phosphate) or ADP to resolutions of 3.4 [A], 3.4 [A] and 3.6 [A]. Subunits in the three filaments have nearly identical backbone conformations, so assembly rather than ATP hydrolysis or phosphate dissociation is responsible for their flattened conformation in filaments. Polymerization increases the rate of ATP hydrolysis by changing the conformations of the three ATP phosphates and the side chains of Gln137 and His161 in the active site. Flattening also promotes interactions along both the long-pitch and short-pitch helices. In particular, conformational changes in subdomain 3 open up favorable interactions with the DNase-I binding loop in subdomain 2 of the adjacent subunit. Subunits at the barbed end of the filament are likely to be in this favorable conformation, while monomers are not. This difference explains why filaments grow faster at the barbed end than the pointed end. Loss of hydrogen bonds after phosphate dissociation may account for the greater flexibility of ADP-actin filaments.\n\nSignificance StatementActin filaments comprise a major part of the cytoskeleton of eukaryotic cells and serve as tracks for myosin motor proteins. The filaments assemble from actin monomers with a bound ATP. After polymerization, actin rapidly hydrolyzes the bound ATP and slowly dissociates the {gamma}-phosphate. ADP-actin filaments then disassemble to recycle the subunits. Understanding how actin filaments assemble, disassemble and interact with numerous regulatory proteins depends on knowing the structure of the filament. High quality structures of ADP-actin filaments were available, but not of filaments with bound ATP- or with ADP and phosphate. We determined structures of actin filaments with bound AMPPNP (a slowly hydrolyzed ATP analog), ADP and phosphate and ADP by cryo-electron microscopy. These structures show how conformational changes during actin assembly promote ATP hydrolysis and faster growth at one end of the filament than the other.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2017

Conformational changes in Arp2/3 complex induced by ATP, WASp-VCA and actin filaments

We used fluorescence spectroscopy and electron microscopy to determine how binding of ATP, nucleation-promoting factors (NPF), actin monomers and actin filaments change the conformation of Arp2/3 complex during the process that nucleates an actin filament branch. We mutated subunits of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Arp2/3 complex for labeling with fluorescent dyes at either the C-termini of Arp2 and Arp3 or ArpC1 and ArpC3. We measured Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET) efficiency (ETeff) between the dyes in the presence of the various ligands. We also computed class averages from electron micrographs of negatively stained specimens. ATP binding made small conformational changes of the nucleotide binding clefts of the Arp subunits. WASp-VCA, WASp-CA, and WASp-actin-VCA changed the ETeff between the dyes on the Arp2 and Arp3 subunits much more than between dyes on ArpC1 and ArpC3. Ensemble FRET detected a different structural change that involves bringing ArpC1 and ArpC3 closer together when Arp2/3 complex bound actin filaments. Each of the ligands that activates Arp2/3 complex changes the structure in different ways, each leading progressively to fully activated Arp2/3 complex on the side of a filament.

biophysics↗

bioRxiv2017

Analysis Of Interphase Node Proteins In Fission Yeast By Quantitative And Super Resolution Fluorescence Microscopy

We used quantitative confocal microscopy and FPALM super resolution microscopy of live fission yeast to investigate the structures and assembly of two types of interphase nodes, multiprotein complexes associated with the plasma membrane that merge together and mature into the precursors of the cytokinetic contractile ring. During the long G2 phase of the cell cycle seven different interphase node proteins maintain constant concentrations as they accumulate in proportion to cell volume. During mitosis the total numbers of type 1 node proteins (cell cycle kinases Cdr1p, Cdr2p, Wee1p, and anillin Mid1p) are constant even when the nodes disassemble. Quantitative measurements provide strong evidence that both types of nodes have defined sizes and numbers of constituent proteins, as observed for cytokinesis nodes. Type 1 nodes assemble in two phases, a burst at the end of mitosis, followed by steady increase during interphase to double the initial number. Type 2 nodes containing Blt1p, Rho-GEF Gef2p, and kinesin Klp8p remain intact throughout the cell cycle and are constituents of the contractile ring. They are released from the contractile ring as it disassembles and then associate with type 1 nodes around the equator of the cell during interphase.\n\nHighlight summaryFPALM super resolution microscopy and quantitative confocal microscopy reveal that interphase nodes, the precursors to the fission yeast cytokinetic contractile ring, are discrete unitary structures with defined sizes and ratios of component proteins. Type 1 nodes disassemble during mitosis, but type 2 nodes remain intact throughout the cell cycle.

cell biology↗