bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Pocock, M. J. O.

Publications and source records attributed to Pocock, M. J. O..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Phenologically Explicit Robustness Metric Reveals Increased Vulnerabilities in Temporal Plant-Pollinator Networks

Robustness is a useful metric in evaluating the ability of an ecosystem to resist further extinction after species loss. This measure is straightforward to calculate from empirical interaction data, however doing so typically requires a static network of time-aggregated interactions, ignoring the finer-scale variation imposed by species phenologies. Although the analysis of time-aggregated ecological networks has been successful in capturing their overall structure, it often leads to the loss of information of the within-season variation that ecosystems typically exhibit. We demonstrate how this approach can also dramatically overestimate robustness by assuming all interactions are concurrent. Here, we develop a new measure of temporal robustness that incorporates the time-varying nature of species interactions. We apply our measure to plant-pollinator systems using both simulated and empirical networks, and obtain analytical predictions for the temporal robustness of randomly generated networks. In each case, our analysis reveals a substantial loss of information in the established static-network robustness measure, which obscures the crucial role of phenology in determining the vulnerability of pollinators to species loss. We find that pollinators active over long time periods appear more robust after time-aggregation, but typically have a much lower temporal robustness, indicating that long-lived pollinators may be more vulnerable to plant loss than previously thought.

ecology↗

Combined effect of crop rotation and carabid beetles on weed dynamics in arable fields

Weed management is a resource-intensive practice in arable agriculture, with direct and long-term impacts on both productivity and biodiversity (e.g. plant, pollinators and farmland wildlife). In conventional systems, weed control relies on crop management and herbicide inputs, but for more sustainable production systems, use of herbicides needs to be reduced. This requires a good understanding of the processes that regulate arable weed dynamics in arable fields. We adopted a systems framework to understand and model interacting components that drive the weed dynamics in 168 arable fields. Within this framework, we built a structural equation model (SEM) to quantify the direct and indirect effects of crop rotation (i.e. crops in the previous three years and the current year) and carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) on weed density, seed abundance and accumulation in the seedbank. We included results from a mechanistic approach to infer interactions between seed-feeding carabid beetles and seeds to estimate predation pressure in each field. Our results show that weeds in arable fields are regulated by crop type, sowing season, and activity density of carabid beetles. We found a direct effect of crop rotation, including both past and current field management practice, on weed abundance in the field and its seedbank. There was also an indirect effect of crops on weed seed accumulation in the seedbank via the effect of seed-eating carabid beetles. The efficiency of weed control by carabid beetles depended on the cumulative predation pressure, which indicates the importance of functional diversity as well as abundance. Farmers and agronomists can capitalise on the ecosystem services provided by carabid beetles by adapting agronomic practices and crop rotation to maintain a rich fauna of seed-eating carabids in fields and potentially across the agricultural landscapes. When integrated with rotational management practices, this ecosystem services can improve the efficiency of weed management and contribute to the sustainability of cropping systems.

ecology↗

Rapid assessment of the suitability of multi-species citizen science datasets for occupancy trend analysis

O_LISpecies records from volunteers are a vast and valuable source of information on biodiversity for a wide range of taxonomic groups. Although these citizen science data are opportunistic and unstructured, occupancy analysis can be used to quantify trends in distribution. However, occupancy analysis of unstructured data can be resource-intensive and requires substantial expertise. It is valuable to have simple rules of thumb to efficiently assess the suitability of a dataset for occupancy analysis prior to analysis.\nC_LIO_LIOur analysis was possible due to the production of trends, from our Bayesian occupancy analysis, for 10 967 species from 34 multi-species recording schemes in Great Britain. These schemes had an average of 500 visits to sites per year, and an average of 20% of visited sites received a revisit in a year. Occupancy trend outputs varied in their precision and we used expert elicitation on a subset of outputs to determine a precision threshold above which trends were suitable for further consideration. We then used classification trees with seven metrics to define simple rules explaining when the data would result in outputs that met the precision threshold.\nC_LIO_LIWe found that the suitability of a species data was best described by (i) the number of records of the focal species in the 10% best-recorded years, and (ii) the proportion of recording visits for that taxonomic group with non-detections of the focal species. Surprisingly few data were required to be predicted to meet the precision threshold. Specifically, for 98% confidence that our Bayesian occupancy models would produce outputs meeting the precision threshold, there needed to be [≥]29 records of the focal species in the 10% best-recorded years (equivalent to an average of 12.5 records per year in our dataset), although only [≥]10 records (equivalent to 4.5 records per year) were required for species recorded in less than 1 in 25 visits.\nC_LIO_LIWe applied these rules to regional species data for Great Britain. Data from 32% of the species:region combinations met the precision threshold with 80% confidence, and 14% with 98% confidence. There was great variation between taxonomic groups (e.g. butterflies, moths and dragonflies were well recorded) and region (e.g. south-east England was best recorded).\nC_LIO_LIThese simple criteria provide no indication of the accuracy or representativeness of the trend outputs: this is vital, but needs to be assessed individually. However our criteria do provide a rapid, quantitative assessment of the predicted suitability of existing data for occupancy analysis and could be used to inform the design and implementation of multi-species citizen science recording projects elsewhere in the world.\nC_LI

ecology↗

Estimating sampling completeness of interactions in quantitative bipartite ecological networks: incorporating variation in species specialisation

BackgroundThe analysis of ecological networks can be affected by sampling effort, potentially leading to bias. Ecological network structure is often summarised by descriptive metrics but these metrics can vary according to the proportion of the total interactions that have been observed. Therefore, to know the likely degree of bias, it is valuable to estimate the total number of interactions in a network, and so calculate the proportion of interactions that have been observed (sampling completeness of interactions). Existing approaches to estimate sampling completeness of interactions use the Chao family of asymptotic species richness estimators to predict the total number of interactions, but do not fully utilise information about the relative specialisation of species within the network.\n\nResultsHere, we propose a modification of previously-used methods, that places equal weight on each interaction (whether or not it has been observed), rather than on each species. Our approach is therefore equivalent to weighting the interaction sampling completeness of each species in the network according to its relative specialisation. We demonstrate that, for the subset of species that are observed and when assuming that species richness estimators accurately project the number of unobserved interactions per observed species, our approach is mathematically more accurate. Our approach can be universally applied to any quantitative, bipartite network.\n\nWe propose two methods to estimation using our approach, using abundance-based and incidence-based species richness estimators respectively, and give recommendations when each should be applied. We discuss the effect of unobserved species and the potential use of a threshold of minimum abundance for species inclusion. Finally, we consider these advances in the context of some of the main issues surrounding estimation of interaction sampling completeness in network ecology.\n\nConclusionsWe recommend that future studies of bipartite networks utilise our approach and methods to estimate the sampling completeness of interactions, to assist with the quantitative and comparative analysis and interpretation of network properties.

ecology↗

Extinction models of robustness for weighted ecological networks

O_LIAnalysis of ecological networks is a valuable approach to understanding the vulnerability of systems to environmental change. The tolerance of ecological networks to co-extinctions, resulting from sequences of primary extinctions, is a widely-used tool for modelling network robustness. Previously, these extinction models have been developed for and applied mostly to binary networks and recently used to predict cascades of co-extinctions in plant-pollinator networks. There is a need for robustness models that can make the most of the weighted data available and most importantly there is a need to understand how the structure of a network affects its robustness.\nC_LIO_LIHere, we developed a framework of extinction models for bipartite ecological networks (specifically plant-pollinator networks). In previous models co-extinctions occurred when nodes lost all their links, but by relaxing this rule (according to a set threshold) our models can be applied to binary and weighted networks, and can permit structurally correlated extinctions, i.e. the potential for avalanches of extinctions. We tested how the average and the range of robustness values is impacted by network structure and the impact of structurally-correlated extinctions sampling non-uniformly from the distribution of random extinction sequences.\nC_LIO_LIWe found that the way that structurally-correlated extinctions are modelled impacts the results; our two ecologically-plausible models produce opposing effects which shows the importance of understanding the model. We found that when applying the models to networks with weighted interactions, the effects are amplified and the variation in robustness increases. Variation in robustness is a key feature of these extinction models and is driven by the structural heterogeneity (i.e. the skewness of the degree distribution) of nodes (specifically, plant nodes) in the network.\nC_LIO_LIOur new framework of models enables us to calculate robustness with weighted, as well as binary, bipartite networks, and to make direct comparisons between models and between networks. This allows us to differentiate effects of the model and of the data (network structure) which is vital for those making ecological inferences from robustness models. The models can be applied to mutualistic and antagonistic networks, and can be extended to food webs.\nC_LI

ecology↗