bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Plets, G.

Publications and source records attributed to Plets, G..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Sedimentary ancient DNA expands bioarchaeological evidence and interpretation at Roman Harelbeke

Sedimentary ancient DNA (sedaDNA) can expand archaeological research by recovering broad biological signals from small amounts of sediment. Here, we apply shotgun sedaDNA metagenomics and target capture (also known as hybridization capture) to disused Roman wells from the vicus of Harelbeke, Belgium, dated to ca. 160-300 CE, and integrate the results with existing bioarchaeological datasets. Moving beyond individual introduced taxa as proxies for Roman influence, we reconstruct community-level profiles spanning consumption-related, synanthropic, and environmental organisms. SedaDNA reproduced most established bioarchaeological signals, including cultivated plants and domestic animals, while also recovering additional environmental taxa that established methods underrepresented. Mitochondrial target capture strengthened selected faunal detections and enabled phylogenetic placement of a pig (Sus scrofa) within the European mitochondrial lineage. The predominance of previously established consumption-related taxa is consistent with subsistence continuity and selective adoption of Roman-introduced resources, although taxon counts alone cannot establish their relative importance. Analytical-effort modeling further indicates that batch-based sedaDNA workflows can provide broad biological profiles at lower cost and time investment than established archaeological methods. Overall, sedaDNA complements conventional bioarchaeology by broadening taxonomic recovery, supporting scalable sampling, and providing a broad-spectrum approach to reconstructing settlement ecology, subsistence, and human-environment interaction.

genomics↗

Towards an archaeological workflow for sedaDNA sample collection: methods and best practices for minimizing surface contamination

SedaDNA has been successfully recovered from diverse contexts, enabling researchers to address paleoenvironmental questions such as ecosystem changes and climatic shifts, along with archaeological questions related to past human activities, diet, health, and interactions with their environment. Despite its potential, the reliability of sedaDNA data heavily depends on proper sampling and handling practices. Contamination remains a significant challenge in ancient DNA research, profoundly impacting data integrity and interpretation. Consequently, numerous studies have underscored the importance of minimizing contamination levels. Nonetheless, a challenge arises in implementing this in daily archaeological practice, as a specialized DNA expert is not always available. This study suggests two customised workflows of commonly used sedaDNA sampling techniques, redesigned for archaeologists without sedaDNA expertise. We test their effectiveness in the field. To benchmark these protocols, we applied artificial DNA contaminants onto sediment surfaces before sampling. Subsequently, we evaluate archaeologists effectiveness in reducing surface contamination by quantifying the level of artificial DNA detected. Finally, we compare results between samples taken by archaeologists with and without sedaDNA expertise. Our results demonstrate that existing sampling protocols, when slightly adapted to the needs of archaeologists, significantly minimize surface contamination to the point that they provide high-quality extraction. Additionally, our findings suggest that subsampling sediments with minimal surface contamination from previously collected materials is viable, emphasizing the potential of archived sediment collections for sedaDNA analysis.

genomics↗