Piret, J. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2025

Influenza A Virus Interferes With Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Mice and Reconstituted Human Airway Epithelium

Epidemiological studies suggest that respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and influenza A virus (IAV) might interfere with each other. Viral interference mainly relies on interferon production elicited by a first virus that reduces the replication of a second virus. In this paper, we first investigated the interactions between RSV-A2 and influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 in BALB/c mice infected with each single virus or both viruses simultaneously or sequentially before, at the peak of interferon elicited by each virus or after that peak. IAV reduced by almost 3.0 logs the replication of RSV administered at the peak of interferon induced by influenza, but the opposite was not true. However, IAV-infected mice challenged with RSV or the vehicle lost more weight and had a lower survival rate compared to single infections. Interferon expression, cytokine levels and pulmonary inflammation were almost similar between groups. Disease worsening was attributed to an aggravation of IAV-induced pulmonary congestion following intranasal instillation of fluid (with or without RSV). In human airway epithelia, IAV also interfered with RSV replication. Viral interference was dependent on the timing and sequence of infections, but not on differential interferon susceptibilities. Overall, our results help to understand the mechanisms of interaction between two major respiratory viruses. ImportanceRespiratory syncytial virus and influenza virus may interfere with each other based on epidemiological studies. It is suggested that a first virus may induce the production of interferon and interfere with the replication of a second unrelated virus. Our data showed that influenza A virus interferes with respiratory syncytial virus replication in mouse lungs, but the opposite was not observed. In reconstituted human airway epithelia, viral interference was dependent on the timing and sequence of infections, but not on differential interferon susceptibilities. Understanding the mechanisms of interaction between respiratory viruses may help the development of prophylactic or therapeutic modalities.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2024

Viral interference between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and influenza A viruses

Some respiratory viruses can cause a viral interference through the activation of the interferon (IFN) pathway that reduces the replication of another virus. Epidemiological studies of coinfections between SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses have been hampered by non-pharmaceutical measures applied to mitigate the spread of SARS-CoV-2 during the COVID-19 pandemic. With the ease of these interventions, SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A viruses can now co-circulate. It is thus of prime importance to characterize their interactions. In this work, we investigated viral interference effects between an Omicron variant and a contemporary influenza A/H3N2 strain, in comparison with an ancestral SARS-CoV-2 strain and the 2009 pandemic influenza A/H1N1 virus. We infected nasal human airway epitheliums with SARS-CoV-2 and influenza, either simultaneously or 24 h apart. Viral load was measured by RT-qPCR and IFN-/{beta}/{lambda}1/{lambda}2 proteins were quantified by immunoassay. Expression of four interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs; OAS1/IFITM3/ISG15/MxA) was also measured by RT-droplet digital PCR. Additionally, susceptibility of each virus to IFN-/{beta}/{lambda}2 recombinant proteins was determined. Our results showed that influenza A, and especially A/H3N2, interfered with both SARS-CoV-2 viruses, but that SARS-CoV-2 only interfered with A/H1N1. Consistently with these results, influenza, and particularly the A/H3N2 strain, caused a higher production of IFN proteins and expression of ISGs than SARS-CoV-2. The IFN production induced by SARS-CoV-2 was marginal and its presence during coinfections with influenza was associated with a reduced IFN response. All viruses were susceptible to exogenous IFNs, with the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 and Omicron being less susceptible to type I and type III IFNs, respectively. Thus, influenza A causes a viral interference towards SARS-CoV-2 most likely through an IFN response. The opposite is not necessarily true, and a concurrent infection with both viruses leads to a lower IFN response. Taken together, these results help us to understand how SARS-CoV-2 interacts with another major respiratory pathogen. Author summaryDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, non-pharmaceutical measures were able to reduce the spread of SARS-CoV-2 and most respiratory viruses. Since the ease of these measures, SARS-CoV-2 variants and other viruses, such as influenza A, have started to co-circulate and can now infect a same host and interact with each other. These interactions can lead to attenuated or aggravated infections and can affect the timing of epidemics. Therefore, it is very important to elucidate how the new SARS-CoV-2 interacts with other viruses to better predict their implications in human health and their epidemic activity. Our work contributes to better understand these interactions using viruses that have likely co-circulated after lifting mitigation interventions, i.e., SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant and a contemporary influenza A/H3N2 strain. We studied how each virus may affect the other virus growth and how these interactions were associated with the innate immune response of the host. We found that a prior infection with influenza A can decrease the growth of SARS-CoV-2 while the latter reduces the innate immune response. Our results help to understand the interplay between SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A in the host and may improve mathematical models predicting epidemics.

microbiology↗