Biology subjects

Pezic, D.

Publications and source records attributed to Pezic, D..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

STAG3 promotes exit from pluripotency through post-transcriptional mRNA regulation in the cytoplasm.

STAG proteins are key regulators of the cohesin complex and are often linked to alterations in cell identity and disease. Among the mammalian STAG paralogs, STAG3 has been less extensively studied beyond its known roles in meiosis. In this work, we demonstrate that STAG3 is expressed in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) and primordial germ cell-like cells (PGCLCs), where it is required for cell fate decisions. Distinct from the other STAG proteins, STAG3 mediates its effects in the cytoplasm, facilitating the post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression. Furthermore, STAG3 localises to the centrosome independently of cohesin and interacts with proteins involved in mRNA localisation and stability. The knockdown of STAG3 in mESCs using siRNAs results in the destabilisation of the centrosome and the key P-body RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) component TNRC6C, leading to the derepression of P-body localised mRNAs, such as DPPA3. Our results propose a model in which STAG3 collaborates with RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) and specific target mRNAs to control post-transcriptional gene expression and facilitate the transition from pluripotency in mESCs. Given that STAG3 is upregulated in various cancers, our results provide a novel perspective on how STAG proteins might contribute to cell identity and disease.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2021

STAG proteins promote cohesin ring loading at R-loops.

Most studies of cohesin function consider the Stromalin Antigen (STAG/SA) proteins as core complex members given their ubiquitous interaction with the cohesin ring. Here, we provide functional data to support the notion that the SA subunit is not a mere passenger in this structure, but instead plays a key role in the localization of cohesin to diverse biological processes and promotes loading of the complex at these sites. We show that in cells acutely depleted for RAD21, SA proteins remain bound to chromatin, cluster in 3D and interact with CTCF, as well as with a wide range of RNA binding proteins involved in multiple RNA processing mechanisms. Accordingly, SA proteins interact with RNA and are localised to R-loops where they contribute to R-loop regulation. Our results place SA1 within R-loop domains upstream of the cohesin complex and reveal a role for SA1 in cohesin loading which is independent of NIPBL, the canonical cohesin loader. We propose that SA1 takes advantage of structural R-loop platforms to link cohesin loading and chromatin structure with diverse functions. Since SA proteins are pan-cancer targets, and R-loops play an increasingly prevalent role in cancer biology, our results have important implications for the mechanistic understanding of SA proteins in cancer and disease.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2021

The cohesin regulator Stag1 promotes cell plasticity through heterochromatin regulation.

Several studies have shown a role for Stag proteins in cell identity. Our understanding of how Stag proteins contribute to cell identity have largely been focused on its roles in chromosome topology as part of the cohesin complex and the impact on protein-coding gene expression. Furthermore, several Stag paralogs exist in mammalian cells with non-reciprocal chromosome structure and cohesion functions. Why cells have so many Stag proteins and what specific functions each Stag protein performs to support a given cell state are poorly understood. Here we reveal that Stag1 is the dominant paralog in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESC) and is required for pluripotency. Through the discovery of diverse, naturally occurring Stag1 isoforms in mESCs, we shed new light not only on the unique ends of Stag1 but also the critical role that their levels play in stem cell identity. Furthermore, we revel a new role for Stag1, and specifically its unique N-terminal end, in regulating nucleolar integrity and safeguarding mESCs from totipotency. Stag1 is localised to repressive perinucleolar regions, bound at repeats and interacts with Nucleolin and TRIM28. Loss of the Stag1 N-terminus, leads to decreased LINE-1 and rRNA expression and disruption of nucleolar structure and function which consequently leads to activation of the two-cell-like (2C-LC)-specific transcription factor DUX and conversion of pluripotent mESCs to totipotent 2C-LCs. Our results move beyond protein-coding gene regulation via chromatin loops into a new role for Stag1 in repeat regulation and nucleolar structure, and offer fresh perspectives on how Stag proteins contribute to cell identity and disease.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2017

An Integrative Framework For Detecting Structural Variations In Cancer Genomes

Structural variants can contribute to oncogenesis through a variety of mechanisms, yet, despite their importance, the identification of structural variants in cancer genomes remains challenging. Here, we present an integrative framework for comprehensively identifying structural variation in cancer genomes. For the first time, we apply next-generation optical mapping, high-throughput chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C), and whole genome sequencing to systematically detect SVs in a variety of cancer cells.\n\nUsing this approach, we identify and characterize structural variants in up to 29 commonly used normal and cancer cell lines. We find that each method has unique strengths in identifying different classes of structural variants and at different scales, suggesting that integrative approaches are likely the only way to comprehensively identify structural variants in the genome. Studying the impact of the structural variants in cancer cell lines, we identify widespread structural variation events affecting the functions of non-coding sequences in the genome, including the deletion of distal regulatory sequences, alteration of DNA replication timing, and the creation of novel 3D chromatin structural domains.\n\nThese results underscore the importance of comprehensive structural variant identification and indicate that non-coding structural variation may be an underappreciated mutational process in cancer genomes.

genomics↗