bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Petrazzini, M. E. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Petrazzini, M. E. M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Neural Basis of Number Sense in Larval Zebrafish

Number sense, the ability to discriminate discrete quantity, is widespread across animals, yet how this capacity develops remains unknown. Using two-photon light-sheet imaging, we recorded whole-brain activity at single-cell resolution in larval zebrafish (Danio rerio) exposed to controlled visual numerosity stimuli. We discovered that number-selective neurons emerge in a striking developmental sequence: cells tuned to numerosity 1 are already present at 3 days post-fertilization (dpf), and neurons selective for 2, 3, and higher quantities appear in increasing abundance later, at 5 and 7 dpf, accompanied by a relative reduction in 1-tuned cells. The proportion of number-selective cells, summed over all tested numerosities, relative to all identified neurons in the brain, was found to decrease over time. We further showed that a machine-learning decoder based on the activity of the number-selective neurons can predict the number stimulus seen by the animals with accuracies at better than twice chance level. These results reveal how neuronal circuits develop structured numerical codes and provide a framework for studying the emergence of cognitive primitives at cellular resolution.

neuroscience↗

An insect's view of a numerosity illusion: a simple strategy may explain complex numerical performance in bumblebees

Despite some similarities in numerical abilities among vertebrates, animals seem to differ with respect to the perceptual factors underlying numerical estimation. This is particularly evident in the case of numerosity illusions, a type of illusory phenomena elicited by the spatial arrangement of the elements that compose it. We investigated whether an insect experiences the most famous numerosity illusion, the Solitaire Illusion. Bumblebees (Bombus terrestris audax) presented with two mixed arrays containing magenta and yellow dots were trained to select the array containing the larger number of a target colour (either magenta or yellow). In the test phases, bumblebees were presented with sets of stimuli differing in the numerical ratio, including the illusory arrays: in one array, magenta dots were centrally located (yellow dots in the perimeter), whereas in the other one, magenta dots were located in the perimeter (yellow dots in the centre). Bees discriminated up to a ratio of 0.78 (14 vs. 18). Video analyses showed that bumblebees sequentially scanned the stimuli before making a choice. Bumblebees required longer scanning time for patterns with smaller numbers of reinforced colour dots, suggesting that bumblebees spent longer time on searching for more information or finding a reinforced arrangement of spatial dots before making an accurate decision. In the presence of the "illusion arrangement", bees behaved in a manner consistent with misperception of numerosity, overestimating the number of centrally located dots. The spatial configuration of the stimuli influenced how the patterns were assessed: bees examined the clustered reinforced colour dots longer. Flying paths analysis suggested that bumblebees followed the paths formed by similar colour dots rather than counting each dot to make a numerical discrimination. These results challenge the notion that visual illusions can be inferred simply from evaluating choices of different visual patterns and reinforce the idea that multiple strategies can potentially be used to achieve seemingly similar cognitive outcomes. Detailed analyses of decision-making processes are essential to deduce the cognitive strategies underpinning discrimination tasks, whether they are numerical or other visual tasks.

animal behavior and cognition↗