bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Peters, J.-M.

Publications and source records attributed to Peters, J.-M..

26 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

A Protein Engineering Approach for Uncovering Cryptic Ubiquitin-binding Sites: from a Ubiquitin-Variant Inhibitor of APC/C to K48 Chain Binding

Ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis is a fundamental mechanism used by eukaryotic cells to maintain homeostasis and protein quality, and to control timing in biological processes. Two essential aspects of ubiquitin regulation are conjugation through E1-E2-E3 enzymatic cascades, and recognition by ubiquitin-binding domains. An emerging theme in the ubiquitin field is that these two properties are often amalgamated in conjugation enzymes. In addition to covalent thioester linkage to ubiquitins C-terminus for ubiquitin transfer reactions, conjugation enzymes often bind non-covalently and weakly to ubiquitin at \"exosites\". However, identification of such sites is typically empirical and particularly challenging in large molecular machines. Here, studying the 1.2 MDa E3 ligase Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC/C), which controls cell division and many aspects of neurobiology, we discover a method for identifying unexpected ubiquitin-binding sites. Using a panel of ubiquitin variants (UbVs) we identify a protein-based inhibitor that blocks ubiquitin ligation to APC/C substrates in vitro and ex vivo. Biochemistry, NMR, and cryo EM structurally define the UbV interaction, explain its inhibitory activity through binding the surface on the APC2 subunit that recruits the E2 enzyme UBE2C, and ultimately reveal that this APC2 surface is also a ubiquitin-binding exosite with preference for K48-linked chains. The results provide a new tool for probing APC/C activity, have implications for the coordination of K48-linked Ub chain binding by APC/C with the multistep process of substrate polyubiquitylation, and demonstrate the power of UbV technology for identifying cryptic ubiquitin binding sites within large multiprotein complexes.\n\nSIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTUbiquitin-mediated interactions influence numerous biological processes. These are often transient or a part of multivalent interactions. Therefore, unmasking these interactions remains a significant challenge for large, complicated enzymes such as the Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC/C), a multisubunit RING E3 ubiquitin (Ub) ligase. APC/C activity regulates numerous facets of biology by targeting key regulatory proteins for Ub-mediated degradation. Using a series of Ub variants (UbVs), we identified a new Ub-binding site on the APC/C that preferentially binds to K48-linked Ub chains. More broadly, we demonstrate a workflow that can be exploited to uncover Ub-binding sites within ubiquitylation machinery and other associated regulatory proteins to interrogate the complexity of the Ub code in biology.

biochemistry↗

Absolute quantification of cohesin, CTCF and their regulators in human cells

The organisation of mammalian genomes into loops and topologically associating domains (TADs) contributes to chromatin structure, gene expression and recombination. Loops and TADs are formed by cohesin and positioned by CTCF. In proliferating cells, cohesin also mediates sister chromatid cohesion, which is essential for chromosome segregation. Current models of chromatin folding and cohesion are based on assumptions of how many cohesin and CTCF molecules organise the genome. Here we have measured absolute copy numbers and dynamics of cohesin, CTCF, NIPBL, WAPL and sororin by mass spectrometry, fluorescence-correlation spectroscopy and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching in HeLa cells. In G1-phase there are ~245,000 cohesin complexes, of which ~139,000 are on chromatin. Comparison with chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing data implies that some genomic cohesin and CTCF enrichment sites are unoccupied in single cells at any one time. We discuss the implications of these findings for how cohesin can contribute to genome organisation and cohesion.

cell biology↗

Dynamics of sister chromatid resolution during cell cycle progression

Faithful genome transmission in dividing cells requires that the two copies of each chromosomes DNA package into separate, but physically linked, sister chromatids. The linkage between sister chromatids is mediated by cohesin, yet where sister chromatids are linked and how they resolve during cell cycle progression has remained unclear. Here, we investigated sister chromatid organization in live human cells using dCas9-mEGFP labelling of endogenous genomic loci. We detected substantial sister locus separation during G2 phase, irrespective of the proximity to cohesin enrichment sites. Almost all sister loci separated within a few hours after their respective replication, and then rapidly equilibrated their average distances within dynamic chromatin polymers. Our findings explain why the topology of sister chromatid resolution in G2 largely reflects the DNA replication program. Further, these data suggest that cohesin enrichment sites are not persistent cohesive sites in human cells. Rather, cohesion might occur at variable genomic positions within the cell population.

cell biology↗

An experimental and computational framework to build a dynamic protein atlas of human cell division

Essential biological functions, such as mitosis, require tight coordination of hundreds of proteins in space and time. Localization, timing of interactions and changes in cellular structure are all crucial to ensure correct assembly, function and regulation of protein complexes1-4. Live cell imaging can reveal protein distributions and dynamics but experimental and theoretical challenges prevented its use to produce quantitative data and a model of mitosis that comprehensively integrates information and enables analysis of the dynamic interactions between the molecular parts of the mitotic machinery within changing cellular boundaries.\n\nTo address this, we generated a 4D image data-driven, canonical model of the morphological changes during mitotic progression of human cells. We used this model to integrate dynamic 3D concentration data of many fluorescently knocked-in mitotic proteins, imaged by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy-calibrated microscopy5. The approach taken here in the context of the MitoSys consortium to generate a dynamic protein atlas of human cell division is generic. It can be applied to systematically map and mine dynamic protein localization networks that drive cell division in different cell types and can be conceptually transferred to other cellular functions.

systems biology↗

CTCF, WAPL and PDS5 proteins control the formation of TADs and loops by cohesin

Mammalian genomes are organized into compartments, topologically-associating domains (TADs) and loops to facilitate gene regulation and other chromosomal functions. Compartments are formed by nucleosomal interactions, but how TADs and loops are generated is unknown. It has been proposed that cohesin forms these structures by extruding loops until it encounters CTCF, but direct evidence for this hypothesis is missing. Here we show that cohesin suppresses compartments but is essential for TADs and loops, that CTCF defines their boundaries, and that WAPL and its PDS5 binding partners control the length of chromatin loops. In the absence of WAPL and PDS5 proteins, cohesin passes CTCF sites with increased frequency, forms extended chromatin loops, accumulates in axial chromosomal positions (vermicelli) and condenses chromosomes to an extent normally only seen in mitosis. These results show that cohesin has an essential genome-wide function in mediating long-range chromatin interactions and support the hypothesis that cohesin creates these by loop extrusion, until it is delayed by CTCF in a manner dependent on PDS5 proteins, or until it is released from DNA by WAPL.

genomics↗

A Mechanism of Cohesin-Dependent Loop Extrusion Organizes Zygotic Genome Architecture

Fertilization triggers assembly of higher-order chromatin structure from a naive genome to generate a totipotent embryo. Chromatin loops and domains are detected in mouse zygotes by single-nucleus Hi-C (snHi-C) but not bulk Hi-C. We resolve this discrepancy by investigating whether a mechanism of cohesin-dependent loop extrusion generates zygotic chromatin conformations. Using snHi-C of mouse knockout embryos, we demonstrate that the zygotic genome folds into loops and domains that depend on Scc1-cohesin and are regulated in size by Wapl. Remarkably, we discovered distinct effects on maternal and paternal chromatin loop sizes, likely reflecting loop extrusion dynamics and epigenetic reprogramming. Polymer simulations based on snHi-C are consistent with a model where cohesin locally compacts chromatin and thus restricts inter-chromosomal interactions by active loop extrusion, whose processivity is controlled by Wapl. Our simulations and experimental data provide evidence that cohesin-dependent loop extrusion organizes mammalian genomes over multiple scales from the one-cell embryo onwards.\n\nHighlightsO_LIZygotic genomes are organized into cohesin-dependent chromatin loops and TADs\nC_LIO_LILoop extrusion leads to different loop strengths in maternal and paternal genomes\nC_LIO_LICohesin restricts inter-chromosomal interactions by altering chromosome surface area\nC_LIO_LILoop extrusion organizes chromatin at multiple genomic scales\nC_LI

genomics↗

Synthetic lethality between the cohesin subunits STAG1 and STAG2 in diverse cancer contexts

Recent genome analyses have identified recurrent mutations in the cohesin complex in a wide range of human cancers. Here we demonstrate that the most frequently mutated subunit of the cohesin complex, STAG2, displays a strong synthetic lethal interaction with its paralog STAG1. Mechanistically, STAG1 loss abrogates sister chromatid cohesion in STAG2 mutated but not in wild-type cells leading to mitotic catastrophe, defective cell division and apoptosis. STAG1 inactivation inhibits the proliferation of STAG2 mutated but not wild-type bladder cancer and Ewing sarcoma cell lines. Restoration of STAG2 expression in a mutated bladder cancer model alleviates the dependency on STAG1. Thus, STAG1 and STAG2 support sister chromatid cohesion to redundantly ensure cell survival. STAG1 represents a vulnerability of cancer cells carrying mutations in the major emerging tumor suppressor STAG2 across different cancer contexts. Exploiting synthetic lethal interactions to target recurrent cohesin mutations in cancer, e.g. by inhibiting STAG1, holds the promise for the development of selective therapeutics.

cancer biology↗

Hardwired synthetic lethality within the cohesin complex in human cancer cells

Recent genome analyses have identified recurrent mutations in the cohesin complex in a wide range of human cancers. Here we demonstrate that the most frequently mutated subunit of the cohesin complex, STAG2, displays a strong synthetic lethal interaction with its paralog STAG1. Mechanistically, STAG1 loss abrogates sister chromatid cohesion in STAG2 mutated but not in wild-type cells leading to mitotic catastrophe, defective cell division and apoptosis. STAG1 inactivation inhibits the proliferation of STAG2 mutated but not wild-type bladder cancer and Ewing sarcoma cell lines. Restoration of STAG2 expression in a mutated bladder cancer model alleviates the dependency on STAG1. Thus, STAG1 and STAG2 act redundantly to support sister chromatid cohesion and cell survival. STAG1 represents a hardwired, context independent vulnerability of cancer cells carrying mutations in the major emerging tumor suppressor STAG2. Exploiting synthetic lethal interactions to target recurrent cohesin mutations in cancer, e.g. by inhibiting STAG1, holds the promise for the development of selective therapeutics.

cell biology↗