bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Perron, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Perron, S..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

eIF4E and Ezrin cooperate in pseudopods to drive a localized migratory translation program in acute myeloid leukemia

Aggressive subtypes of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are characterized by increased migratory behavior and poor prognosis prioritizing the need for uncovering relevant mechanisms. While attributed to transcriptional changes, these AMLs manifest dysregulated eIF4E implicating disrupted mRNA metabolism. Here, we observed in AML mouse models, patient specimens, and cell lines that eIF4E drives motility, colonization, engraftment and AML progression. AML cells migrate utilizing Ezrin-positive pseudopods. Unexpectedly, we discovered that eIF4E interacts with Ezrin, that these physically associated factors are required and cooperated to drive an on-demand translation program in pseudopods for motility. Indeed, pseudopods were sites of eIF4E- and Ezrin-dependent translation by implementing the first method to directly mark active ribosomes in situ (Visualizing Translation Activity using RiboLace, VISTA-R). Biochemically, Ezrin bound eIF4E, ribosomal components, and mRNAs consistent with our observed Ezrin-dependent modulation of protein production. This unprecedented physical coupling of motility and translation provisions migratory sites to sustain AML progression. Highlights- eIF4E reduction impairs AML cell motility and disease progression - eIF4E-dependent motility requires Ezrin - Ezrin binds eIF4E, transcripts encoding motility factors and active ribosomes - VISTA-R enabled visualization of active ribosomes and translationally active pseudopods (T-PODs) - T-PODs provide novel on-demand localized translation to sustain mobility at migratory sites Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=142 SRC="FIGDIR/small/707190v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (41K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@164f191org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@2f8928org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d5ad7forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@719a69_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

cancer biology↗

Comparison of interferometric light microscopy with nanoparticle tracking analysis for the study of extracellular vesicles and bacteriophages

Research on extracellular vesicles (EVs) and bacteriophages (phages) has been steadily expanding over the past decades as many of their roles in medicine, biology, and ecosystems have been unveiled. Such interest has brought about the need for new tools to quantify and determine the sizes of these biological nanoparticles. A new device based on interferometric light microscopy (ILM), the Videodrop, was recently developed for this purpose. Here, we compared this new device to two nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) devices, the NanoSight and the ZetaView, for the analysis of EVs and phages. We used EVs isolated from bacteria, fecal samples, bovine milk and human cells, and phages of various sizes and shape, ranging from 30 to 120 nm of diameter. While NTA instruments correctly enumerated most phages, the Videodrop detected only the largest one, indicating a lower sensitivity threshold compared to the NTA devices. Nevertheless, the performance of the Videodrop compared favorably to that of the NTA devices for the determination of the concentration of eukaryotic EV samples. The NanoSight instrument provided the most precise size distributions but the Videodrop was by far the most time-saving device, making it worthy of consideration for studies conducted on a large number of samples.

cell biology↗