Does Sex Modify an Association of Electrophysiological Substrate with Sudden Cardiac Death? The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study
BackgroundSex is a well-recognized risk factor for sudden cardiac death (SCD). Sex differences in electrophysiological (EP) substrate of SCD are known. However, it remains unknown whether sex can modify an association of EP substrate with SCD.\n\nMethodsParticipants from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study with analyzable ECGs (n=14,725; age, 54.2{+/-}5.8 yrs; 55% female, 74% white) were included. EP substrate was characterized by traditional 12-lead ECG (heart rate, QRS, QTc, Cornell voltage), spatial ventricular gradient (SVG) and sum absolute QRST integral (SAI QRST) metrics. Two competing outcomes were adjudicated SCD and nonSCD. Interaction of ECG metrics with sex was studied in Cox proportional hazards and Fine-Gray competing risk models. Relative hazard ratio (RHR) and relative sub-hazard ratio (RSHR) with a 95% confidence interval for SCD and nonSCD risk for women relative to men were calculated. Model 1 was adjusted for prevalent cardiovascular disease (CVD) and risk factors. Time-updated model 2 was additionally adjusted for incident non-fatal CVD.\n\nResultsOver a median follow-up of 24.4 years, there were 530 SCDs (incidence 1.72 (1.58-1.88)/1000 person-years) and 2,178 nonSCDs (incidence 7.09; (6.80-7.39)/ 1000 person-years). Women experienced a greater than men risk of SCD associated with Cornell voltage (RHR 1.18(1.06-1.32); P=0.003), SAI QRST (RHR 1.16(1.04-1.30); P=0.007), area SVG magnitude (RHR 1.24(1.05-1.45); P=0.009), and peak SVG magnitude (RHR 1.22(1.04-1.44); P=0.018), independently from incident CVD. Greater risk of SCD for women than men associated with QRS duration (RHR 1.24(1.07-1.44); P=0.004) and QTc (RSHR 1.15(1.02-1.30); P=0.025) was explained by incident CVD. Furthermore, women had greater odds of SCD associated with heart rate (RSHR 1.19(1.01-1.40); P=0.036), independently of incident CVD.\n\nConclusionsSex modifies an association of EP substrate with SCD. In women, global EP substrate is associated with up to 27% greater risk of SCD than in men. Development of sex-specific risk scores of SCD is necessary. Further studies of mechanisms behind sex differences in EP substrate of SCD are warranted.