Biology subjects

Penone, C.

Publications and source records attributed to Penone, C..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2023

A fast-slow trait continuum at the level of entire communities

Across the tree of life, organismal functional strategies form a continuum from slow-to fast-growing organisms, in response to common drivers such as resource availability and disturbance. However, the synchronization of these strategies at the entire community level is untested. We combine trait data for >2800 above-and belowground taxa from 14 trophic guilds spanning a disturbance and resource availability gradient in German grasslands. Most guilds consistently respond to these drivers through both direct and trophically-mediated effects, resulting in a slow-fast axis at the level of the entire community. Fast trait communities were also associated with faster rates of whole ecosystem functioning. These findings demonstrate that slow and fast strategies can be manifested at the level of whole ecosystems, opening new avenues of ecosystem-level functional classification.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2022

Loss of species richness with land use intensity is explained by a reduction in niche differences.

Increases in land use intensity (LUI) reduce species richness. However, we have a poor understanding of how underlying coexistence mechanisms are altered by land use and whether diversity loss occurs due to changes in plant-plant interactions (competition and facilitation) or in species intrinsic growth rates. We expect that LUI could reduce stabilizing niche differences and the indirect interactions that promote coexistence (e.g., intransitivity), while increasing competitive inequalities between species. To test the importance of these different processes, we use 8-yr time series from 150 grasslands differing in LUI to evaluate the role of direct and indirect interactions in promoting coexistence between 50 plant species. We show that LUI reduces the number of coexisting species mostly by causing a non-linear reduction in niche differences, rather than by enhancing competitive inequalities. However, surprisingly, niche differences remained important in stabilizing coexistence between those species remaining at high LUI. Indirect interactions were generally less important than direct ones, and played a moderate role in promoting coexistence in smaller assemblages of species at intermediate LUI. Our models could accurately reproduce the decline in diversity seen with LUI, indicating that our time series approach captures the important interactions between species. By analyzing land use effects through recent advances in structural stability applied to community ecology we provide a more mechanistic understanding of its effects. Our results highlight the importance of identifying the niche differences that are lost with increasing LUI, to better predict and manage effects of land use on biodiversity. Significant statementHuman land use is a major threat to grassland biodiversity. Grasslands with high rates of fertilization, grazing and mowing, contain many fewer plant species. Knowing the underlying causes is necessary for a better management of biodiversity. Here we apply ecological theory to spatiotemporal data on changes in plant abundance in managed grasslands in central Europe. We show that the observed decline in diversity can be explained by how interactions among plant species change with increases in land use intensity. In particular, intensive land use removes the stabilizing effect of self-limiting processes that buffer species against extinction as well as limit competitive dominance. Therefore, actions to promote these stabilizing dynamics among interacting species seem key to restore plant diversity.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2019

The results of biodiversity-ecosystem functioning experiments are realistic

A large body of research shows that biodiversity loss can reduce ecosystem functioning, thus providing support for the conservation of biological diversity1-4. Much of the evidence for this relationship is drawn from biodiversity-ecosystem functioning experiments (hereafter: biodiversity experiments), in which biodiversity loss is simulated by randomly assembling communities of varying species diversity, and ecosystem functions are measured5-9. This random assembly has led some ecologists to question the relevance of biodiversity experiments to real-world ecosystems, where community assembly may often be non-random and influenced by external drivers, such as climate or land-use intensification10-18. Despite these repeated criticisms, there has been no comprehensive, quantitative assessment of how experimental and real-world plant communities really differ, and whether these differences invalidate the experimental results. Here, we compare data from two of the largest and longest-running grassland biodiversity experiments globally (Jena Experiment, Germany; BioDIV, USA) to related real-world grassland plant communities in terms of their taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity and functional-trait composition. We found that plant communities of biodiversity experiments have greater variance in these compositional features than their real-world counterparts, covering almost all of the variation of the real-world communities (82-96%) while also containing community types that are not currently observed in the real world. We then re-analysed a subset of experimental data that included only ecologically-realistic communities, i.e. those comparable to real-world communities. For ten out of twelve biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships, biodiversity effects did not differ significantly between the full dataset of biodiversity experiments and the ecologically-realistic subset of experimental communities. This demonstrates that the results of biodiversity experiments are largely insensitive to the inclusion/exclusion of unrealistic communities. By bridging the gap between experimental and real-world studies, these results demonstrate the validity of inferences from biodiversity experiments, a key step in translating their results into specific recommendations for real-world biodiversity management.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2018

Towards an Ecological Trait-data Standard

O_LITrait-based approaches are widespread throughout ecological research, offering great potential for trait data to deliver general and mechanistic conclusions. Accordingly,a wealth of trait data is available for many organism groups, but, due to a lack of standardisation, these data come in heterogeneous formats.\nC_LIO_LIWe review current initiatives and infrastructures for standardising trait data and discuss the importance of standardisation for trait data hosted in distributed open-access repositories.\nC_LIO_LIIn order to facilitate the standardisation and harmonisation of distributed trait datasets, we propose a general and simple vocabulary as well as a simple data structure for storing and sharing ecological trait data.\nC_LIO_LIAdditionally, we provide an R-package that enables the transformation of any tabular dataset into the proposed format. This also allows trait datasets from heterogeneous sources to be harmonised and merged, thus facilitating data compilation for any particular research focus.\nC_LIO_LIWith these decentralised tools for trait-data harmonisation, we intend to facilitate the exchange and analysis of trait data within ecological research and enable global syntheses of traits across a wide range of taxa and ecosystems.\nC_LI

ecology↗