Pearse, W. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2023

Surveillance of 16 UK native bat species through conservationist networks uncovers coronaviruses with zoonotic potential

There has been limited characterisation of bat-borne coronaviruses in Europe. Here, we screened for coronaviruses in 48 faecal samples from 16 of the 17 bat species breeding in the UK, collected through a bat rehabilitation and conservationist network. We recovered nine (two novel) complete genomes across six bat species: four alphacoronaviruses, a MERS-related betacoronavirus, and four closely related sarbecoviruses. We demonstrate that at least one of these sarbecoviruses can bind and use the human ACE2 receptor for infecting human cells, albeit suboptimally. Additionally, the spike proteins of these sarbecoviruses possess an R-A-K-Q motif, which lies only one nucleotide mutation away from a furin cleavage site (FCS) that enhances infectivity in other coronaviruses, including SARS-CoV-2. However, mutating this motif to an FCS does not enable spike cleavage. Overall, while UK sarbecoviruses would require further molecular adaptations to infect humans, their zoonotic risk is unknown and warrants closer surveillance.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2022

Information Accumulation and Loss as a Foundation for Sound Phylogenetic Biodiversity Metrics

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWPhylogenetic metrics are essential tools used in the study of ecology, evolution and conservation. Phylogenetic diversity (PD) in particular is one of the most prominent measures of biodiversity, and is based on the idea that biological features accumulate along the edges of phylogenetic trees that are summed. We argue that PD and many other phylogenetic biodiversity metrics fail to capture an essential process that we term attrition. Attrition is the gradual loss of features through causes other than extinction. Here we introduce EvoHeritage, a generalisation of PD that is founded on the joint processes of accumulation and attrition of features. We argue that whilst PD measures evolutionary history, EvoHeritage is required to capture a more pertinent subset of evolutionary history including only components that have survived attrition. We show that EvoHeritage is not the same as PD on a tree with scaled edges; instead, accumulation and attrition interact in a more complex non-monophyletic way that cannot be captured by edge lengths alone. This leads us to speculate that the one dimensional edge lengths of classic trees may be insufficiently flexible to capture the nuances of evolutionary processes. We derive a measure of EvoHeritage and show that it elegantly reproduces species richness and PD at opposite ends of a continuum based on the intensity of attrition. We demonstrate the utility of EvoHeritage in ecology as a predictor of community productivity compared with species richness and PD. We also show how EvoHeritage can quantify living fossils and resolve their associated controversy. We suggest how the existing calculus of PD-based metrics and other phylogenetic biodiversity metrics can and should be recast in terms of EvoHeritage accumulation and attrition. Candidate cover image O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=186 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/499419v5_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (70K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1a4b8cforg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@16145dborg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1316b1eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@16fb06b_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG Artistic cover image prepared for this manuscript. The central tree depicts the gain and loss of Evolutionary Heritage (EvoHeritage) along each edge with its many coloured sections. EvoHeritage is proposed as an expansion of the concept of phylogenetic diversity. Around the outside of the tree are species that feature in our two practical applications of the EvoHeritage calculus: mammals identified as living fossils and plants included in our study of community productivity. The cover image was generated by James Rosin-dell following discussions with co-authors. The Caenolestes outline (representing shrew opossums) and Dromiciops outline (monito del monte) used as components of this image are credited to Sarah Werning and provided under a CC BY 3.0 license; both images were recoloured in brown and placed over a shaded circle. All other images used as components are from the public domain. We thank Mina Mincheva for useful feedback on earlier drafts of the cover image.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2018

Is phylogenetic diversity a surrogate for functional diversity across clades and space?

In the face of the biodiversity crisis, it is argued that we should prioritize species in order to capture high functional diversity (FD). Because species traits often reflect shared evolutionary history, many researchers have advocated for a \"phylogenetic gambit\": maximizing phylogenetic diversity (PD) should indirectly capture FD. For the first time, we empirically test this gambit using data from >15,000 vertebrate species and ecologically-relevant traits. Maximizing PD results in an average gain of 18% of FD relative to random choice. However, this average gain hides the fact that in over 1/3 of the comparisons, maximum PD sets contain less FD than randomly chosen sets of species. These results suggest that, while maximizing PD protection can help to protect FD, it represents a risky strategy.\n\nStatement of authorshipFM, MP, MC, SD, GVDR, RG, AOM, CT and WP conceived the design of the study. FM and GVDR conducted the analysis. FM, RG, MP and WP interpreted the results and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors edited the final version.\n\nData accessibility statementMost of the data is publicly available (see methods). The Fish data is available upon request.\n\nCode accessibility statementR functions developed in this paper are available at https://github.com/FloMazel/FD_PD_Max

ecology↗