bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Pattrick, J. G.

Publications and source records attributed to Pattrick, J. G..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Nanomechanics of Mandible Wear in Insects

Many animals rely on specialised mouthparts to process food. Because this is a mechanically demanding task, mouthparts often wear, with potentially serious consequences for feeding performance and thus fitness. The biomechanics of wear are therefore of clear biological relevance, but remain poorly understood, especially in insects, where conventional engineering wear tests are hard to implement. Here, we present a nanomechanical characterisation of the mandibular epicuticle of three insect species: two leaf-cutting specialists, one with and one without transition-metal inclusions, and an omnivore. Contrary to predictions from simple engineering wear theory, wear resistance was neither directly proportional to indentation hardness nor inversely proportional to wear load. We suggest that this discrepancy arises in part from the high hardness-to-modulus ratio of mandibular epicuticle, which renders indentation hardness a poor proxy for resistance to plastic deformation. A simple elasto-plastic wear model qualitatively captures the main discrepancies between experiment and theory, and points to a revised set of wear proxies that may allow at least a qualitative ranking of biological materials via iso-performance lines on Ashby plots. Yet, as with most wear models, the wear coefficient remains unpredictable, a limitation strikingly illustrated by the increase in epicuticular wear resistance upon hydration despite a decrease in both hardness and modulus. Together, these observations suggest that purely plastic wear models may often be inadequate for biological materials with a high hardness-to-modulus ratio, and that even elasto-plastic models require careful validation against experimental wear assays. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=78 SRC="FIGDIR/small/731969v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (21K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1970bbdorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@183d02aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d7a76aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@302ad6_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

bioengineering↗

Do pollinators play a role in shaping the essential amino acids found in nectar?

O_LIPlants produce floral nectar as a reward for pollinators, which contains carbohydrates and amino acids (AAs). We designed experiments to test whether pollinators could exert selection pressure on the profiles of AAs in nectar. C_LIO_LIWe used HPLC to measure the free amino acids and sugars in the nectar of 102 UK plant species. Six distinct profiles of essential amino acids (EAAs) were defined using the relative proportions of AAs with a clustering algorithm; we then tested bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) preferences for the EAA profiles and proline using a two-choice assay. C_LIO_LIWe found a phylogenetic signal for the proportions of phenylalanine, methionine and proline as well as the total concentrations of essential and non-essential AAs. However, there was no phylogenetic signal for EAA profile. Bumblebees did not exhibit a preference for any of the six EAA nectar profiles, however, four of the EAA profiles stimulated feeding. In contrast, bumblebees avoided proline in an inverse concentration-dependent manner. C_LIO_LIOur data indicate that bees are likely to have mechanisms for the post-ingestive evaluation of free AAs in solution but are unlikely to taste EAAs at nectar-relevant quantities. We predict that EAAs increase nectar value to bumblebees post-ingestively. C_LI

ecology↗