Biology subjects

Parr, T.

Publications and source records attributed to Parr, T..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2018

Thalamocortical dynamics underlying spontaneous transitions in beta power in Parkinsonism

Parkinsons disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative condition in which aberrant oscillatory synchronization of neuronal activity at beta frequencies (15-35 Hz) across the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuit is associated with debilitating motor symptoms, such as bradykinesia and rigidity. Mounting evidence suggests that the magnitude of beta synchrony in the parkinsonian state fluctuates over time, but the mechanisms by which thalamocortical circuitry regulates the dynamic properties of cortical beta in PD are poorly understood. Using the recently developed generic dynamic causal modelling framework, we recursively optimised a set of plausible models of the thalamocortical circuit (n=144) to infer the neural mechanisms that best explain the transitions between low and high beta power states observed in recordings of field potentials made in the motor cortex of anesthetized Parkinsonian rats. Bayesian model comparison suggests that upregulation of cortical rhythmic activity in the beta-frequency band results from changes in the coupling strength both between and within the thalamus and motor cortex. Specifically, our model indicates that high levels of cortical beta synchrony are mainly achieved by a delayed (extrinsic) input from thalamic relay cells to deep pyramidal cells and a fast (intrinsic) input from middle pyramidal cells to superficial pyramidal cells. We therefore hypothesize that beta synchronisation at the cortical level could selectively be modulated via interventions that are capable of finely regulating cortical excitability in a spatial (delivered to either the superficial or deep cortical laminae) and time specific manner.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

Generalised free energy and active inference: can the future cause the past?

We compare two free energy functionals for active inference under Markov decision processes. One of these is a functional of beliefs about states and policies, but a function of observations, while the second is a functional of beliefs about all three. In the former (expected free energy), prior beliefs about outcomes are not part of the generative model (because they are absorbed into the prior over policies). Conversely, in the second (generalised free energy); priors over outcomes become an explicit component of the generative model. When using the free energy function, which is blind to counterfactual (i.e., future) observations, we equip the generative model with a prior over policies that ensure preferred (i.e., priors over) outcomes are realised. In other words, selected policies minimise uncertainty about future outcomes by minimising the free energy expected in the future. When using the free energy functional - that effectively treats counterfactual observations as hidden states - we show that policies are inferred or selected that realise prior preferences by minimising the free energy of future expectations. Interestingly, the form of posterior beliefs about policies (and associated belief updating) turns out to be identical under both formulations, but the quantities used to compute them are not.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

Social intelligence model with multiple internal models

To exhibit social intelligence, animals have to recognize who they are communicating with. One way to make this inference is to select among multiple internal generative models of each conspecific. This induces an interesting problem: when receiving sensory input generated by a particular conspecific, how does an animal know which internal model to update? We consider a theoretical and neurobiologically plausible solution that enables inference and learning under multiple generative models by integrating active inference and (online) Bayesian model selection. This scheme fits sensory inputs under each generative model. Model parameters are then updated in proportion to the probability it could have generated the current input (i.e., model evidence). We show that a synthetic bird who employs the proposed scheme successfully learns and distinguishes (real zebra finch) birdsongs generated by several different birds. These results highlight the utility of having multiple internal models to make inferences in complicated social environments.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2017

Biological Self-organisation and Markov blankets

Biological self-organisation is a process of spontaneous pattern formation; namely the emergence of coherent and stable systemic configurations that distinguish themselves from their environment. This process can occur at various spatial scales: from the microscopic (giving rise to cells) to the macroscopic (the emergence of organisms). Self-organisation at each level is essential to account for the hierarchical organisation of living organisms (organelles within cells, within tissues, within organs, etc.). In this paper, we pursue the idea that Markov blankets - statistical boundaries separating states that are external to a system from its internal states - emerge at every possible level of the description of the (living) system. Through simulations, we show that the concept of a Markov blanket is fundamental in defining biological systems and underwrites the nature and form of interactions between successive levels of hierarchical structure. We demonstrate the validity of our argument using simulations, based on the normative principle of variational free energy minimisation. Specifically, we adopt a top-down approach to provide a proof of concept for the claim that the self-organisation of Markov blankets (and blankets of blankets) underwrites the self-evidencing, autopoietic behaviour of living systems.

systems biology↗