Biology subjects

Parnell, T. J.

Publications and source records attributed to Parnell, T. J..

7 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

SWI/SNF Alterations Define a Chromatin-Dependent Subtype of Urothelial Carcinoma

PurposeSWI/SNF (BAF) chromatin remodeling complex alterations are common in urothelial carcinoma, yet no biomarker-directed therapeutic strategies have been established for this population. We investigated whether BAF alterations delineate a biologically distinct, therapeutically actionable urothelial carcinoma subtype. Experimental DesignWe performed integrative genomic and transcriptomic analyses of 792 urothelial carcinoma tumors from the Oncology Research Information Exchange Network (ORIEN) and validated findings in the TCGA-BLCA cohort. Mechanistic studies incorporated RNA sequencing and ATAC-seq following histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibition. Functional dependencies were assessed using patient-derived xenograft organoids and cell line models. Clinical relevance was explored in a biomarker-enriched investigator-initiated trial. ResultsApproximately half of urothelial carcinoma tumors exhibited BAF alterations, defining a previously unrecognized chromatin-altered molecular subtype characterized by activation of proliferative programs, loss of lineage identity, and altered metabolic signaling. This subtype was enriched for transcriptomic programs associated with HDAC inhibitor sensitivity and depleted of HDAC inhibitor resistance signatures. Mechanistically, HDAC inhibition induced widespread chromatin remodeling with reduced accessibility at AP-1 and TEAD-associated regions, and downregulation of E2F- and MYC-driven transcriptional networks. Functional studies confirmed enhanced HDAC inhibition sensitivity in ARID1A-mutated cell lines and a patient-derived organoid model. Early clinical observations demonstrated a durable responder treated with HDAC inhibitors and immunotherapy. ConclusionsBAF alterations define a chromatin-dependent tumor state in urothelial carcinoma that is selectively vulnerable to HDAC inhibition. Integrating genomic, epigenomic, functional, and early clinical evidence, these findings provide a rationale for biomarker-enriched clinical trials and HDAC inhibitor-based combination strategies in urothelial carcinoma.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2026

3D chromatin compartment of round spermatids encodes the spatiotemporal program of histone-to-protamine exchange in spermiogenesis

Sperm formation requires a radical chromatin reorganization, where nucleosomes are replaced by transition proteins (TNPs) and subsequently by protamines (PRM1 and PRM2). Although essential for fertility, the regulatory logic governing this exchange is unknown, but its presumed to be stochastic and unregulated. Using endogenously tagged PRM mouse models and stage-resolved, genome-wide profiling, we revise the order of histone-to-protamine exchange and show that the chromatin remodeling process is highly programmed. Imaging and biochemical experiments reveal a direct histone-to-PRM1 exchange, while TNPs appear after PRM1 but precede PRM2 incorporation. This temporal uncoupling of PRM1 and PRM2 incorporation coincides with dynamic, region-specific chromatin remodeling that is not governed by histone acetylation but is instructed by the three-dimensional nuclear architecture of round spermatids. Therefore, by integrating ATAC-seq, CUT&Tag, and Hi-C, we define a compartment-encoded "blueprint" that prescribes the assembly of the mature sperm epigenome and establishes a complex molecular hierarchy for the histone-to-protamine exchange.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2023

FoxA1/2-dependent epigenomic reprogramming drives lineage switching in lung adenocarcinoma

The ability of cancer cells to alter their identity is essential for tumor survival and progression. Loss of the pulmonary lineage specifier NKX2-1 within KRAS-driven lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) enhances tumor progression and results in a pulmonary-to-gastric lineage switch that is dependent upon the activity of pioneer factors FoxA1 and FoxA2; however, the underlying mechanism remains largely unknown. Here, we show that FoxA1/2 reprogram the epigenetic landscape of NKX2-1-negative LUAD to facilitate a gastric identity. After Nkx2-1 deletion, FoxA1/2 mediate demethylation of gastric-defining genes through recruitment of TET3, an enzyme that induces DNA demethylation. H3K27ac ChIP-seq and HiChIP show that FoxA1/2 also control the activity of regulatory elements and their 3D interactions at gastric loci. Furthermore, oncogenic KRAS is required for the FoxA1/2-dependent epigenetic reprogramming. This work demonstrates the role of FoxA1/2 in rewiring the methylation and histone landscape and cis-regulatory dynamics of NKX2-1-negative LUAD to drive cancer cell lineage switching.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2021

Genetic analysis argues for a coactivator function for the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Tup1 corepressor

The Tup1-Cyc8 corepressor complex of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is recruited to promoters by DNA-binding proteins to repress transcription of genes, including the a-specific mating type genes. We report here a tup1(S649F) mutant that displays mating irregularities similar to a tup1 null and an -predominant growth defect. RNA-Seq and ChIP-Seq were used to analyze gene expression and Tup1 occupancy changes in mutant vs. wild-type in both a and cells. Increased Tup1(S649F) occupancy tended to occur upstream of upregulated genes, whereas locations with decreased occupancy usually did not show changes in gene expression, suggesting this mutant not only loses corepressor function but also behaves as a coactivator. Based upon studies demonstrating a dual role of Tup1 in both repression and activation, we postulate that the coactivator function of Tup1(S649F) results from diminished interaction with repressor proteins, including 2. We also found that large changes in mating type-specific gene expression between a and or between mutant and wild-type were not easily explained by the range of Tup1 occupancy levels within their promoters, as predicted by the classic model of a-specific gene repression by Tup1. Most surprisingly, we observed Tup1 occupancy upstream of the a-specific gene MFA2 and the -specific gene MF(ALPHA)1 in cells in which each gene was expressed rather than repressed. These results, combined with identification of additional mating related genes upregulated in the tup1(S649F) strain, illustrate that the role of Tup1 in distinguishing mating types in yeast appears to be both more comprehensive and more nuanced than previously appreciated.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2020

Ash1 and Tup1 Dependent Repression of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HO promoter Requires Activator-Dependent Nucleosome Eviction

Transcriptional regulation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HO gene is highly complex, requiring a balance of multiple activating and repressing factors to ensure that only a few transcripts are produced in mother cells within a narrow window of the cell cycle. Here, we show that the Ash1 repressor associates with two DNA sequences that are usually concealed within nucleosomes in the HO promoter and recruits the Tup1 corepressor and the Rpd3 histone deacetylase, both of which are required for full repression in daughters. Genome-wide ChIP identified greater than 200 additional sites of co-localization of these factors, primarily within large, intergenic regions from which they could regulate adjacent genes. Most Ash1 binding sites are in nucleosome depleted regions (NDRs), while a small number overlap nucleosomes, similar to HO. We demonstrate that Ash1 binding to the HO promoter does not occur in the absence of the Swi5 transcription factor, which recruits coactivators that evict nucleosomes, including the nucleosomes obscuring the Ash1 binding sites. In the absence of Swi5, artificial nucleosome depletion allowed Ash1 to bind, demonstrating that nucleosomes are inhibitory to Ash1 binding. The location of binding sites within nucleosomes may therefore be a mechanism for limiting repressive activity to periods of nucleosome eviction that are otherwise associated with activation of the promoter. Our results illustrate that activation and repression can be intricately connected, and events set in motion by an activator may also ensure the appropriate level of repression and reset the promoter for the next activation cycle.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2019

Specialization of the chromatin remodeler RSC to mobilize partially-unwrapped nucleosomes

SWI/SNF-family chromatin remodeling complexes, such as S. cerevisiae RSC, slide and eject nucleosomes to regulate transcription. Within nucleosomes, stiff DNA sequences confer spontaneous partial unwrapping, prompting whether and how SWI/SNF-family remodelers are specialized to remodel partially-unwrapped nucleosomes. RSC1 and RSC2 are orthologs of mammalian PBRM1 (polybromo) which define two separate RSC sub-complexes. Remarkably, in vitro the Rsc1-containing complex remodels partially-unwrapped nucleosomes much better than does the Rsc2-containing complex. Moreover, a rsc1{Delta} mutation, but not rsc2{Delta}, is lethal with histone mutations that confer partial unwrapping. Rsc1/2 isoforms both cooperate with the DNA-binding proteins Rsc3/30 and the HMG protein, Hmo1, to remodel partially-unwrapped nucleosomes, but show differential reliance on these factors. Notably, genetic impairment of these factors strongly reduces the expression of genes with wide nucleosome-deficient regions (e.g. ribosomal protein genes), known to harbor partially-unwrapped nucleosomes. Taken together, Rsc1/2 isoforms are specialized through composition and interactions to manage and remodel partially-unwrapped nucleosomes.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2018

FACT activity and histone H3-K56 acetylation promote optimal establishment of chromatin architecture independent of ongoing transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

FACT is a histone chaperone that can destabilize or assemble nucleosomes. Acetylation of histone H3-K56 weakens a histone:DNA contact that is central to FACT activity, suggesting that this modification could affect FACT functions. We tested this by asking how mutations of H3-K56 and FACT affect nucleosome structure, chromatin integrity, and transcription output. Mimics of unacetylated or permanently acetylated H3-K56 had different effects on FACT in vitro and in vivo as expected, but H3-K56 and FACT mutations caused surprisingly similar changes in transcription of individual genes. Notably, neither the changes in transcript levels nor the effects on nucleosome occupancy resulting from mutations conformed to the model that FACT is needed to overcome nucleosomal barriers during transcription initiation or elongation. Instead, the results suggest that both FACT and H3-K56ac are involved in establishing chromatin architecture prior to transcription and restoring it afterwards. They contribute to a process that optimizes transcription frequency, especially at conditionally expressed genes, and restores chromatin integrity after transcription, especially at the +1 nucleosome to block antisense transcription, but FACT appears to be less involved than expected in directly promoting transcription.

genomics↗