bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Parker, M. I.

Publications and source records attributed to Parker, M. I..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

A penultimate classification of canonical antibody CDR conformations

Antibody complementarity determining regions (CDRs) are loops within antibodies responsible for engaging antigens during the immune response and in antibody therapeutics and laboratory reagents. Since the 1980s, the conformations of the hypervariable CDRs have been structurally classified into a number of "canonical conformations" by Chothia, Lesk, Thornton, and others. In 2011 (North et al, J Mol Biol. 2011), we produced a quantitative clustering of approximately 300 structures of each CDR based on their length, a dihedral angle metric, and an affinity propagation algorithm. The data have been made available on our PyIgClassify website since 2015 and have been widely used in assigning conformational labels to antibodies in new structures and in molecular dynamics simulations. In the years since, it is has become apparent that many of the clusters are not "canonical" since they have not grown in size and still contain few sequences. Some clusters represent multiple conformations, given the assignment method we have used since 2015. Electron density calculations indicate that some clusters are due to misfitting of coordinates to electron density. In this work, we have performed a new statistical clustering of antibody CDR conformations. We used Electron Density in Atoms (EDIA, Meyder et al., 2017) to produce data sets with different levels of electron density validation. Clusters were chosen by their presence in high electron density cutoff data sets and with sufficient sequences ([≥]10) across the entire PDB (no EDIA cutoff). About half of the North et al. clusters have been "retired" and 13 new clusters have been identified. We also include clustering of the H4 and L4 CDRs, otherwise known as the "DE loop" which connects strands D and E of the variable domain. The DE loop sometimes contacts antigens and affects the structure of neighboring CDR1 and CDR2 loops. The current database contains 6,486 PDB antibody entries. The new clustering will be useful in the analysis and development of new antibody structure prediction and design algorithms based on rapidly emerging techniques in deep learning. The new clustering data are available at http://dunbrack2.fccc.edu/PyIgClassify2.

immunology↗

An expanded classification of active, inactive, and druggable RAS conformations

For many human cancers and tumor-associated diseases, mutations in the RAS isoforms (KRAS, NRAS, and HRAS) are the most common oncogenic alterations, making these proteins high-priority therapeutic targets. Effectively targeting the RAS isoforms requires an exact understanding of their active, inactive, and druggable conformations. However, there is no structure-guided catalogue of RAS conformations to guide therapeutic targeting or examining the structural impact of RAS mutations. We present an expanded classification of RAS conformations based on analyzing their catalytic switch 1 (SW1) and switch 2 (SW2) loops. From all 721 available human KRAS, NRAS, and HRAS structures in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) (206 RAS-protein complexes, 190 inhibitor-bound, and 325 unbound, including 204 WT and 517 mutated structures), we created a broad conformational classification based on the spatial positions of residue Y32 in SW1 and residue Y71 in SW2. Subsequently, we defined additional conformational subsets (some previously undescribed) by clustering all well modeled SW1 and SW2 loops using a density-based machine learning algorithm with a backbone dihedral-based distance metric. In all, we identified three SW1 conformations and nine SW2 conformations, each which are associated with different nucleotide states (GTP-bound, nucleotide-free, and GDP-bound) and specific bound proteins or inhibitor sites. The GTP-bound SW1 conformation can be further subdivided based on the hydrogen (H)-bond type made between residue Y32 and the GTP {gamma}-phosphate: water-mediated, direct, or no H-bond. Further analyzing these structures clarified the catalytic impact of the G12D and G12V RAS mutations, and the inhibitor chemistries that bind to each druggable RAS conformation. To facilitate future RAS structural analyses, we have created a web database, called Rascore, presenting an updated and searchable dataset of human KRAS, NRAS, and HRAS structures in the PDB, and which includes a page for analyzing user uploaded RAS structures by our algorithm (http://dunbrack.fccc.edu/rascore/). SignificanceAnalyzing >700 experimentally determined RAS structures helped define an expanded landscape of active, inactive and druggable RAS conformations, the structural impact of common RAS mutations, and previously uncharacterized RAS-inhibitor binding modes.

bioinformatics↗