bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Parise, C. V.

Publications and source records attributed to Parise, C. V..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Spatiotemporal models for multisensory integration

Animals excel at seamlessly integrating information from different senses, a capability critical for navigating complex environments. Despite recent progress in multisensory research, the absence of stimulus-computable perceptual models fundamentally limits our understanding of how the brain extracts and combines task-relevant cues from the continuous flow of natural multisensory stimuli. Here, we introduce an image- and sound-computable population model for audiovisual perception, based on biologically plausible units that detect spatiotemporal correlations across auditory and visual streams. In a large-scale simulation spanning 69 psychophysical, eye-tracking, and pharmacological experiments, our model replicates human, monkey, and rat behaviour in response to diverse audiovisual stimuli with an average correlation exceeding 0.97. Despite relying on as few as 0 to 4 free parameters, our model provides an end-to-end account of audiovisual integration in mammals--from individual pixels and audio samples to behavioural responses. Remarkably, the population response to natural audiovisual scenes generates saliency maps that predict spontaneous gaze direction, Bayesian causal inference, and a variety of previously reported multisensory illusions. This study demonstrates that the integration of audiovisual stimuli, regardless of their spatiotemporal complexity, can be accounted for in terms of elementary joint analyses of luminance and sound level. Beyond advancing our understanding of the computational principles underlying multisensory integration in mammals, this model provides a bio-inspired, general-purpose solution for multimodal machine perception.

neuroscience↗

Multisensory integration operates on correlated input from unimodal transients channels

Audiovisual information reaches the brain via both sustained and transient input channels, representing signals intensity over time or changes thereof, respectively. To date, it is unclear to what extent transient and sustained input channels contribute to the combined percept obtained through multisensory integration. Based on the results of two novel psychophysical experiments, here we demonstrate the importance of the transient (instead of the sustained) channel for the integration of audiovisual signals. To account for the present results, we developed a biologically-inspired, general-purpose model for multisensory integration, the Multisensory Correlation Detectors, which combines correlated input from unimodal transient channels. Besides accounting for the results of our psychophysical experiments, this model could quantitatively replicate several recent findings in multisensory research, as tested against a large collection of published datasets. In particular, the model could simultaneously account for the perceived timing of audiovisual events, multisensory facilitation in detection tasks, causality judgments, and optimal integration. All-in-all, this study demonstrates that several phenomena in multisensory research that were previously considered unrelated, all stem from the integration of correlated input from unimodal transient channels.

neuroscience↗

Multisensory correlation computations in the human brain uncovered by a time-resolved encoding model

Neural mechanisms that arbitrate between integrating and segregating multisensory information are essential for complex scene analysis and for the resolution of the multisensory correspondence problem. However, these mechanisms and their dynamics remain largely unknown, partly because classical models of multisensory integration are static. Here, we used the Multisensory Correlation Detector, a model that provides a good explanatory power for human behavior while incorporating dynamic computations. Participants judged whether sequences of auditory and visual signals originated from the same source (causal inference) or whether one modality was leading the other (temporal order), while being recorded with magnetoencephalography. To test the match between the Multisensory Correlation Detector dynamics and the magnetoencephalographic recordings, we developed a novel dynamic encoding-model approach of electrophysiological activity, which relied on temporal response functions. First, we confirm that the Multisensory Correlation Detector explains causal inference and temporal order patterns well. Second, we found strong fits of brain activity to the two outputs of the Multisensory Correlation Detector in temporo-parietal cortices, a region with known multisensory integrative properties. Finally, we report an asymmetry in the goodness of the fits, which were more reliable during the causal inference than during the temporal order judgment task. Overall, our results suggest the plausible existence of multisensory correlation detectors in the human brain, which explain why and how causal inference is strongly driven by the temporal correlation of multisensory signals.

neuroscience↗