bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Panidi, K.

Publications and source records attributed to Panidi, K..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Reward impulsivity is linked to addictive-like behaviors towards sweet food and sugary drinks but not fatty food

Overconsumption of hyperpalatable food is a worldwide problem. Although many previous studies have shown the link between monetary delay discounting and propensity to overconsume food, the studies did not focus on the link between delay discounting and various subcategories of palatable food. In the present study, we investigate the link between the individual propensity to choose smaller immediate rather than larger delayed reward and the degree of problematic eating behavior for five types of palatable food (sweets, sugary drinks, fatty food, salty snacks, and starchy food). The delay discounting task was used to measure propensity to choose immediate rather than delayed rewards, while the degree of addictive-like behavior was measured using the modified Yale food addiction scale (mYFAS) for each food category. Both model-free and model-based analysis showed that there is a significant correlation between the addiction score for sweet food and the tendency to choose smaller immediate rather than larger delayed rewards. A model-based analysis showed the same significant correlation for sugary drinks. However, no such correlation was observed for other food categories (fatty, salty, or starchy food), suggesting that reward impulsivity may play different roles in addictive-like behavior towards various food categories.

neuroscience↗

Posterior parietal cortex is causally involved in reward valuation but not probability weighting during risky choice

This study provides evidence that the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) is causally involved in risky decision making via the processing of reward values but not reward probabilities. In the within-group experimental design, participants performed a binary lottery choice task following transcranial magnetic stimulation of the right PPC, left PPC and a right PPC sham (placebo) stimulation. Both, mean-variance and the prospect theory approach to risky choice showed that the PPC stimulation changed participants preferences towards greater risk aversion compared to sham. On the behavioral level, after the PPC stimulation the likelihood of choosing a safer option became more sensitive to the difference in standard deviations between lotteries, compared to sham, indicating greater risk avoidance within the meanvariance framework. We also estimated the shift in prospect theory parameters of risk preferences after PPC stimulation. The hierarchical Bayesian approach showed moderate evidence (BF = 7.44 and 5.41 for right and left PPC respectively) for a credible change in risk aversion parameter towards lower marginal reward value (and, hence, lower risk tolerance), while no credible change in probability weighting was observed. Additionally, we observed anecdotal evidence (BF = 2.9) for a credible increase in the consistency of responses after the left PPC stimulation compared to sham.

neuroscience↗