bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Paluch, K.

Publications and source records attributed to Paluch, K..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Common but different: An ERP study of single- and multi-source interference processing in MSIT

Flexible behavior often requires processing of complex, interfering information. Research has investigated conflict-related brain processes mostly using single tasks which hindered direct comparison of different interference types. Thus, the question if they are resolved by a common mechanism or by a set of different, task-specific mechanisms remains open. In this study, we used event-related potentials (ERPs) to examine the spatio-temporal dynamics of cognitive control across Simon, flanker, multi-source and no-conflict conditions. Our findings reveal that all trial types engaged the same sequence of processing stages, as indicated by common ERP waveforms and consistent number and order of microstates across conditions. However, the intensity and duration of these common stages scaled with difficulty of the conflict task (as measured by RTs and accuracy) from Simon to flanker to multi-source interference. Flanker conflict uniquely influenced early ERP components strongly engaging the dorsal attentional system and visual areas, likely due to demands posed by the presence of flanker distractors. Later ERP components (with sources including ventral attention and somatomotor network areas) were affected by both conflicts. Accordingly, when flanker and Simon conflicts were presented together, early processes lineary summed up, but there was an interaction at the later stage of processing paralleling nonlinear drop of accuracy in a multi-conflict condition. Our study provides novel insights into the neural dynamics underlying cognitive control engaged across different conflict types and their interaction. The use of source analysis allowed us to ground ERP-based findings in the wider context of studies, including those using neuroimaging techniques. Highlights- The same processing stages, in same order are evoked in control and conflict trials - Their intensity/duration scale with conflict behavioral difficulty - Flanker conflict demands enhanced early attentional (DAN) and visual processing - Flanker and Simon interact at the late-stage processing involving VAN and SM networks - Flanker and Simon interaction is sublinear

neuroscience↗

Common and distinct BOLD correlates of Simon and flanker conflicts which can(not) be reduced to time-on-task effects

The ability to identify and resolve conflicts between standard, well trained behaviors, and behaviors required by the current context is an essential feature of cognitive control. To date, no consensus has been reached on the brain mechanisms involved in exerting such control: while some studies identified diverse patterns of activity across different conflicts, other studies reported common resources across conflict tasks or even across simple tasks devoid of conflict component. The latter reports attributed the entire activity observed in the presence of conflict to longer time spent on the task (i.e. to the so-called time-on-task effects). Here we used an extended Multi-Source Interference Task (MSIT) which combines Simon and flanker types of interference to determine shared and conflict-specific mechanisms of conflict resolution in fMRI, and their separability from the time-on-task effects. Large portions of the activity in the dorsal attention network and decreases of activity in the default mode network were shared across the tasks and scaled in parallel with increasing reaction times. Importantly, activity in the sensory and sensorimotor cortices, as well as in the posterior medial frontal cortex (pMFC)-a key region implicated in conflict processing-could not be exhaustively explained by the time-on-task effects.

neuroscience↗