Biology subjects

Palmblad, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Palmblad, M..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

ProteoBench: the community-curated platform for comparing proteomics data analysis workflows

Mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics is a well-established strategy for analyzing complex biological mixtures. Many MS instruments and data acquisition strategies are available, and the data they acquire differ substantially, thus requiring tailored analysis algorithms. Hence, many dedicated bioinformatics workflows are developed. These are in constant evolution, and the community lacks a centralized platform for comparing their performance. Here, we propose ProteoBench, a single platform that brings together software developers and software users to provide an ever-evolving comparison of state-of-the-art proteomics data processing tools. ProteoBench is an open-source resource that enables the community to evaluate data analysis workflows, develop benchmarking modules dedicated to specific comparisons, and discuss the best methods to compare software tools. The platform ensures that the benchmark evolves alongside advances in proteomics data analysis workflows. ProteoBench guides researchers towards the best-suited tool and parameters for their specific project and data according to their needs, and developers can test their newly developed tools or workflows privately, before adding them as public references. This community-driven effort will increase transparency and reproducibility between MS data analysis workflows, as well as facilitate the development and publication of software workflows in the field.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2023

WOMBAT-P: Benchmarking Label-Free Proteomics Data Analysis Workflows

Proteomics research encompasses a wide array of experimental designs, resulting in diverse datasets varying in structure and properties. This diversity has led to a considerable variety of software solutions for data analysis, each of them using multiple tools with different algorithms for operations like peptide-spectrum matching, protein inference, quantification, statistical analysis, and visualization. Computational workflows combine these algorithms to facilitate end-to-end analysis, spanning from raw data to detecting differentially regulated proteins. We introduce WOMBAT-P, a versatile platform designed for the automatic benchmarking and comparison of bottom-up label-free proteomics workflows. By standardizing software parameterization and workflow outputs, WOMBAT-P empowers an objective comparison of four commonly utilized data analysis workflows. Furthermore, WOMBAT-P streamlines the processing of public data based on the provided metadata, with an optional specification of 30 parameters. Wombat-P can use Sample and Data Relationship Format for Proteomics (SDRF-Proteomics) as the file input to simply process annotated local or ProteomeXchange deposited datasets. This feature offers a shortcut for data analysis and facilitates comparisons among diverse outputs. Through an examination of experimental ground truth data and a realistic biological dataset, we unveil significant disparities and a low overlap between identified and quantified proteins. WOMBAT-P not only enables rapid execution and seamless comparison of four workflows (on the same dataset) using a wide range of benchmarking metrics but also provides insights into the capabilities of different software solutions. These metrics support researchers in selecting the most suitable workflow for their specific dataset. The modular architecture of WOMBAT-P promotes extensibility and customization, making it an ideal platform for testing newly developed software tools within a realistic data analysis context.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2021

Further Theoretical Considerations for Next-Generation Proteomics

In a recent Journal of Proteome Research paper, I described some general properties and constraints of a hypothetical next generation of proteomics technology based on single-molecule peptide sequencing. This work prompted many interesting questions, both from the reviewers of the initial manuscript and later from readers and colleagues. This follow-up paper addresses some of questions by clarifying the original results, considering alternative metrics, and a number of new simulations. Specifically, the discriminative power of individual amino acids is revisited, simulating additional proteolytic agents. These simulations show allowing missed cleavages generally increases the discriminative power of the amino acids in the proteolytic motif. Additional simulations show the effect of non-ideal conditions modelled on the number of proteins lacking proteotypic reads is very small, and that the average number of proteotypic reads per protein follow the same rule on the performance of the optimal choice of labeled amino acids as the number of distinguishable proteins in NeXtProt. The goal of this paper is to expand prior results and continue the scientific discussion on the possibilities of future proteomics technologies.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2020

2019 Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities Multi-Laboratory Data-Independent Acquisition Study

Despite the advantages of fewer missing values by collecting fragment ion data on all analytes in the sample, as well as the potential for deeper coverage, the adoption of data-independent acquisition (DIA) in core facility settings has been slow. The Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities conducted a large interlaboratory study to evaluate DIA performance in laboratories with various instrumentation. Participants were supplied with generic methods and a uniform set of test samples. The resulting 49 DIA datasets act as benchmarks and have utility in education and tool development. The sample set consisted of a tryptic HeLa digest spiked with high or low levels of four exogenous proteins. Data are available in MassIVE MSV000086479. Additionally, we demonstrate how the data can be analysed by focusing on two datasets using different library approaches and show the utility of select summary statistics. These data can be used by DIA newcomers, software developers, or DIA experts evaluating performance with different platforms, acquisition settings and skill levels.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2017

A protein standard that emulates homology for the characterization of protein inference algorithms

A natural way to benchmark the performance of an analytical experimental setup is to use samples of known content, and see to what degree one can correctly infer the content of such a sample from the data. For shotgun proteomics, one of the inherent problems of interpreting data is that the measured analytes are peptides and not the actual proteins themselves. As some proteins share proteolytic peptides, there might be more than one possible causative set of proteins resulting in a given set of peptides and there is a need for mechanisms that infer proteins from lists of detected peptides. A weakness of commercially available samples of known content is that they consist of proteins that are deliberately selected for producing tryptic peptides that are unique to a single protein. Unfortunately, such samples do not expose any complications in protein inference. For a realistic benchmark of protein inference procedures, there is, therefore, a need for samples of known content where the present proteins share peptides with known absent proteins. Here, we present such a standard, that is based on E. coli expressed human protein fragments. To illustrate the usage of this standard, we benchmark a set of different protein inference procedures on the data. We observe that inference procedures excluding shared peptides provide more accurate estimates of errors compared to methods that include information from shared peptides, while still giving a reasonable performance in terms of the number of identified proteins. We also demonstrate that using a sample of known protein content without proteins with shared tryptic peptides can give a false sense of accuracy for many protein inference methods.

bioinformatics↗