Biology subjects

Palillo, M. B.

Publications and source records attributed to Palillo, M. B..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

Assessing the Biosecurity Risk of Footwear as a Fomite for Transmission of Adventitious Infectious Agents to Mice

The soles of staff shoes accessing vivaria can become contaminated on urban streets, potentially serving as a source of fomite-mediated transmission of adventitious agents to laboratory rodents. While shoe covers may mitigate this risk, donning them can lead to hand contamination. Staff accessing our vivaria use motor-driven shoe cleaners hundreds of times daily to remove and collect particulates via a vacuum collection system from the top, sole, and sides of shoes instead of shoe covers. Shoe cleaner debris (SCD) and contact media (CM) exposed to SCD from shoe cleaners in 5 vivaria were assessed by PCR for 84 adventitious agents. SCD and CM samples tested positive for 33 and 37 agents, respectively, and a combined 39 agents total. To assess SCD infectivity, NSG and Swiss outbred mice were housed for 7 days in direct contact with SCD and oronasally inoculated with a suspension created from SCD collected from each of the 5 vivaria. Mice were tested by PCR and serology 3-, 7-, 14- and 63-days post-inoculation. All mice remained healthy until the studys end and tested negative for all agents found in SCD/CM except murine astrovirus 1, Staphyloccocus xylosus and Candidatus Savagella, agents known to be enzootic in the experimental mouse source colony. In a follow-up study, the soles of 27 staff street shoes were directly sampled using CM. Half of CM was used for PCR, while the other half was added as bedding material to a cage containing NSG and Swiss outbred mice. While CM tested positive for 11 agents, all mice were healthy 63 days post-exposure and again positive for only enzootic agents. These results suggest that shoe debris might not be a significant biosecurity risk to laboratory mice, questioning the need for shoe covers or cleaners when entering experimental barrier vivaria.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2024

Chlamydia muridarum Causes Persistent Subclinical Infection and Elicits Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses in C57BL/6J, BALB/cJ and J:ARC(S) Mice Following Exposure to Shedding Mice

Chlamydia muridarum (Cm) has reemerged as a moderately prevalent infectious agent in research mouse colonies. Despite its experimental use, few studies evaluate Cms effects on immunocompetent mice following its natural route of infection. A Cm field isolate was administered (orogastric gavage) to 8-week-old female BALB/cJ (C) mice. After confirming shedding (through 95d), these mice were cohoused with naive C57BL/6J (B6), C, and Swiss (J:ARC[S]) mice (n=28/strain) for 30 days. Cohoused mice (n=3-6 exposed and 1-6 control/strain) were evaluated 7, 14, 21, 63, 120, and 180 days post-cohousing (DPC) via hemograms, serum biochemistry analysis, fecal qPCR, histopathology, and Cm MOMP immunohistochemistry. Immunophenotyping was performed on spleen (B6, C, S; n=6/strain) and intestines (B6; n=6) at 14 and 63 DPC. Serum cytokine concentrations were measured (B6; n=6 exposed and 2 control) at 14 and 63 DPC. All B6 mice were shedding Cm by 3 through 180 DPI. One of 3 C and 1 of 6 S mice began shedding Cm at 3 and 14 DPC, respectively, with the remaining shedding thereafter. Clinical pathology was nonremarkable. Minimal-to-moderate enterotyphlocolitis and gastrointestinal associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) hyperplasia was observed in 15 and 47 of 76 Cm-infected mice, respectively. Cm antigen was frequently detected in GALT-associated surface intestinal epithelial cells. Splenic immunophenotyping revealed increased monocytes and shifts in T cell population subsets in all strains/timepoints. Gastrointestinal immunophenotyping (B6) revealed sustained increases in total inflammatory cells and elevated cytokine production in innate lymphoid cells and effector T cells (large intestine). Elevated concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines were detected in the serum (B6). Results demonstrate that while clinical disease was not appreciated, 3 commonly utilized strains of mice are susceptible to chronic enteric Cm infection which may alter various immune responses. Considering the widespread use of mice to model GI disease, institutions should consider excluding Cm from their colonies.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2024

Assessment of Antimicrobial Therapy in Eradicating Chlamydia muridarum in Research Mice: Immune Status and its Impact on Outcomes

Chlamydia muridarum (Cm) is a moderately prevalent, gram-negative, intracellular bacterium that affects laboratory mice, causing subclinical to severe disease, depending on the hosts immune status. The effectiveness of various antibiotic regimens aimed at eradicating Cm in both immunodeficient and immunocompetent laboratory mice was evaluated. NSG mice were cohoused with Cm-shedding BALB/cJ mice for 14 days to simulate natural exposure. Four groups of 8 infected NSG mice were treated for 7 days with either 0.08% sulfamethoxazole and 0.016% trimethoprim (TMS) in water, 0.0625% doxycycline in feed, 0.124%/0.025% TMS in feed, or 0.12% amoxicillin in feed. A control group was provided standard water and feed. The impact of treatment on gastrointestinal microbiota (GM) was performed using next-generation shotgun sequencing on the last day of treatment. TMS and Amoxicillin had negligible effects on GM, while doxycycline had the largest effect. All antibiotic treated NSG mice exhibited clinical disease, including dehydration, hunched posture, >20% weight loss, and dyspnea, leading to euthanasia 21-40 days post-treatment (32.6 {+/-} 4.2 days; mean {+/-} SD). Untreated controls were euthanized 14-33 days post-exposure (23.75 {+/-} 5.9 days). All mice were fecal PCR positive for Cm at euthanasia. Histological evaluation revealed multifocal histiocytic and neutrophilic bronchointerstitial pneumonia and/or bronchiolitis featuring prominent intralesional chlamydial inclusion bodies in all mice. Subsequently, groups of 8 C57BL/6J, BALB/cJ, NOD.SCID, and NSG mice infected with Cm were treated with 0.124%/0.025% TMS in feed for 7 (BALB/cJ and C57BL/6J) or 21 days (NSG and NOD.SCID). All immunocompetent and NOD.SCID mice were negative for Cm by PCR 14 days post-treatment, remained clinically normal and had no evidence of Cm infection at necropsy, all NSG mice remained Cm positive and were euthanized. While these findings highlight the difficulties in eradicating Cm from highly immunodeficient mice, eradication of Cm from immunocompetent or moderately immunocompromised mice with antibiotics is feasible.

pharmacology and toxicology↗

bioRxiv2024

Examining Intercage Transmission of Chlamydia muridarum: Impact of Barrier Husbandry and Cage Sanitization

Chlamydia muridarum (Cm) has reemerged as a prevalent bacterial contaminant of academic research mouse colonies. A study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of husbandry and cage sanitization methods in preventing intercage transmission of Cm. To assess intercage transmission during cage change, a cage housing 2 Cm-free Swiss Webster (Tac:SW; SW) sentinel mice was placed randomly on each of 12 individually ventilated cage racks, housing cages with Cm-shedding mice, located in 1 of 2 animal holding rooms. Husbandry staff blinded to the study cages, changed all cages in the animal holding rooms weekly using microisolator cage technique. PCR testing performed 180 days post-placement confirmed all mice remained negative for Cm. To assess the effectiveness of cage sanitization to eliminate Cm, we investigated transmission of Cm to a naive Cm-free SW and NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid Il2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ (NSG) mouse co-housed for 7 days (repeated weekly for 4 weeks) in cages assigned to 1 of 3 groups (n=10 pairs of mice/group). Cages that previously housed 2 Cm-shedding BALB/c mice were either washed in a tunnel washer (82.2{degrees}C [180{degrees}F] final rinse for an average of 16 seconds per run; n=10) with and without post-washing autoclaving (121{degrees}C for 20 minutes; n=10), or were untreated (bedding change only; n=10). Pre- and post-sanitization swabs of each cage were assayed for Cm by PCR. All pre-treatment swabs tested positive, while post-treatment swabs from all cages (excluding bedding change) tested negative. All SW and NSG mice, irrespective of group, remained negative for Cm as determined by PCR. These findings suggest that infectious Cm does not persist in untreated cages nor after mechanical washing with and without autoclaving. Collectively, these findings suggest that neither our husbandry protocols nor inadequate cage sanitization methods likely contributed to the observed prevalence of Cm in contemporary research mouse colonies.

microbiology↗