Biology subjects

Page, S. G.

Publications and source records attributed to Page, S. G..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

Homologous recombination promotes mitotic death to suppress the innate immune response

Double strand breaks (DSBs) can initiate mitotic catastrophe, a complex oncosuppressive phenomenon characterized by cell death during or after cell division. Through single-cell analysis of extended live imaging, we unveiled how cell cycle-regulated DSB repair guides disparate mitotic catastrophe outcomes. Our data reveal that toxic double Holliday junctions (dHjs) generated during homologous recombination (HR) promote non-immunogenic intrinsic apoptosis in the immediate mitosis after S or G2-phase DSB induction. Conversely, the combined activity of non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), microhomology mediated end joining (MMEJ), and single strand annealing (SSA) enable G1 phase cells to tolerate high DSB loads at the cost of aberrant cell division, innate immune response activation and delayed extrinsic lethality. Targeting NHEJ, MMEJ, or SSA promotes HR-dependent mitotic death, while suppressing mitotic death fosters a robust immunogenic response. Together the data indicate that a temporal repair hierarchy, coupled with cumulative DSB load, serves as a reliable predictor of mitotic catastrophe outcomes. In this pathway, HR suppress the innate immune response by promoting mitotic lethality.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2024

A CPC-shelterin-BTR axis regulates mitotic telomere deprotection

Telomeres prevent ATM activation by sequestering chromosome termini within telomere loops (t-loops). Mitotic arrest promotes telomere linearity and a localized ATM-dependent telomere DNA damage response (DDR) through an unknown mechanism. Using unbiased interactomics, biochemical screening, molecular biology, and super-resolution imaging, we found that mitotic arrest-dependent (MAD) telomere deprotection requires the combined activities of the Chromosome passenger complex (CPC) on shelterin, and the BLM-TOP3A-RMI1/2 (BTR) complex on t-loops. During mitotic arrest, the CPC component Aurora Kinase B (AURKB) phosphorylated both the TRF1 hinge and TRF2 basic domains. The former enhanced CPC and TRF1 interaction through the CPC Survivin subunit, while the latter promoted telomere linearity, telomere DDR activation dependent upon BTR double Holliday junction dissolution activity, and mitotic death. We identify that the TRF2 basic domain functions in mitosis-specific telomere protection and reveal TRF1 regulation over a physiological ATM-dependent telomere DDR. The data demonstrate that MAD telomere deprotection is a sophisticated active mechanism that exposes telomere ends to signal mitotic stress.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2020

BRG1 promotes transcriptional patterns that are permissive to proliferation in cancer cells

BackgroundBRG1 (encoded by SMARCA4) is a catalytic component of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodelling complex, with key roles in modulating DNA accessibility. Dysregulation of BRG1 is observed, but functionally uncharacterised, in a wide range of malignancies. We have probed the functions of BRG1 on a background of prostate cancer to investigate how BRG1 controls gene expression programs and cancer cell behaviour. ResultsOur investigation of SMARCA4 revealed that BRG1 is universally overexpressed in 486 tumours from The Cancer Genome Atlas prostate cohort, as well as in a complementary panel of 21 prostate cell lines. Next, we utilised a temporal model of BRG1 depletion to investigate the molecular effects on global transcription programs. Unexpectedly, depleting BRG1 had no impact on alternative splicing and conferred only modest effect on global expression. However, of the transcriptional changes that occurred, most manifested as down-regulated expression. Deeper examination found the common thread linking down-regulated genes was involvement in proliferation, including several known to increase prostate cancer proliferation (KLK2, PCAT1 and VAV3). Interestingly, the promoters of genes driving proliferation were bound by BRG1 as well as the oncogenic transcription factors, AR and FOXA1. We also noted that BRG1 depletion repressed genes involved in cell cycle progression and DNA replication but intriguingly, these pathways operated independently of AR and FOXA1. In agreement with transcriptional changes, depleting BRG1 conferred G1 arrest. ConclusionsOur data have revealed that BRG1 has capacity to drive oncogenesis by coordinating oncogenic pathways dependent on BRG1 for proliferation, cell cycle progression and DNA replication.

molecular biology↗