bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Ozarslan, E.

Publications and source records attributed to Ozarslan, E..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Understanding cognitive function in post-COVID-19 condition with fatigue: an interdisciplinary multimodal investigation

Lingering cognitive symptoms of post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) continue to challenge our understanding, highlighting the need for interdisciplinary research. We investigated whether individuals with PCC and fatigue differ from matched controls across neurocognitive, neuroimaging, and immunological measures, integrating these findings with qualitative phenomenological analyses through multimodal cross-analysis. Individuals with PCC and clinically significant fatigue (n=34), and age-, sex-, and education-matched controls recovered from COVID-19 without PCC (n=37) were included. Assessments encompassed physician evaluation, neuropsychological and functional tests, structural and functional MRI, immunological tests, and qualitative phenomenological analysis of interviews. Data were analyzed using established methods and an interdisciplinary cross-analysis to examine persistent cognitive symptoms in PCC. Group comparisons revealed subtle differences between individuals with PCC and controls, while neurocognitive performance and immunological markers remained within normative ranges. Modest differences in white matter, myelin related, and global brain measures were observed, alongside differences in associations between network connectivity and neurocognitive performance across groups, suggesting reduced network resilience rather than domain specific deficits. This pattern resonated with qualitative phenomenological findings: altered experiences of concentrating and difficulties to execute decisions and actions, despite preserved performance on standard neurocognitive tests. These findings suggest that cognitive symptoms in post-COVID-19 fatigue are associated with subtle neurobiological alterations not captured by standard cognitive assessments. In this highly fatigued sample, converging neuroimaging, neurocognitive and immunological findings point toward reduced network efficiency rather than overt cognitive impairment. Qualitative phenomenological analysis further highlighted altered modes of being in the world characterized by increased cognitive effort and difficulties executing decisions and actions.

neuroscience↗

Super-resolution mapping of anisotropic tissue structure with diffusion MRI and deep learning

Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (diffusion MRI) is widely employed to probe the diffusive motion of water molecules within the tissue. Numerous diseases and processes affecting the central nervous system can be detected and monitored via diffusion MRI thanks to its sensitivity to microstructural alterations in tissue. The latter has prompted interest in quantitative mapping of the microstructural parameters, such as the fiber orientation distribution function (fODF), which is instrumental for noninvasively mapping the underlying axonal fiber tracts in white matter through a procedure known as tractography. However, such applications demand repeated acquisitions of MRI volumes with varied experimental parameters demanding long acquisition times and/or limited spatial resolution. In this work, we present a deep-learning-based approach for increasing the spatial resolution of diffusion MRI data in the form of fODFs obtained through constrained spherical deconvolution. The proposed approach is evaluated on high quality data from the Human Connectome Project, and is shown to generate upsampled results with a greater correspondence to ground truth high-resolution data than can be achieved with ordinary spline interpolation methods.

neuroscience↗

On the generalizability of diffusion MRI signal representations across acquisition parameters, sequences and tissue types: chronicles of the MEMENTO challenge.

Diffusion MRI (dMRI) has become an invaluable tool to assess the microstructural organization of brain tissue. Depending on the specific acquisition settings, the dMRI signal encodes specific properties of the underlying diffusion process. In the last two decades, several signal representations have been proposed to fit the dMRI signal and decode such properties. Most methods, however, are tested and developed on a limited amount of data, and their applicability to other acquisition schemes remains unknown. With this work, we aimed to shed light on the generalizability of existing dMRI signal representations to different diffusion encoding parameters and brain tissue types. To this end, we organized a community challenge - named MEMENTO, making available the same datasets for fair comparisons across algorithms and techniques. We considered two state-of-the-art diffusion datasets, including single-diffusion-encoding (SDE) spin-echo data from a human brain with over 3820 unique diffusion weightings (the MASSIVE dataset), and double (oscillating) diffusion encoding data (DDE/DODE) of a mouse brain including over 2520 unique data points. A subset of the data sampled in 5 different voxels was openly distributed, and the challenge participants were asked to predict the remaining part of the data. After one year, eight participant teams submitted a total of 80 signal fits. For each submission, we evaluated the mean squared error, the variance of the prediction error and the Bayesian information criteria. Most predictions predicted either multi-shell SDE data (37%) or DODE data (22%), followed by cartesian SDE data (19%) and DDE (18%). Most submissions predicted the signals measured with SDE remarkably well, with the exception of low and very strong diffusion weightings. The prediction of DDE and DODE data seemed more challenging, likely because none of the submissions explicitly accounted for diffusion time and frequency. Next to the choice of the model, decisions on fit procedure and hyperparameters play a major role in the prediction performance, highlighting the importance of optimizing and reporting such choices. This work is a community effort to highlight strength and limitations of the field at representing dMRI acquired with trending encoding schemes, gaining insights into how different models generalize to different tissue types and fiber configurations over a large range of diffusion encodings.

neuroscience↗

Computing the Orientational-Average of Diffusion-Weighted MRI Signals: A Comparison of Different Techniques

Numerous applications in diffusion MRI, from multi-compartment modeling to power-law analyses, involves computing the orientationally-averaged diffusion-weighted signal. Most approaches implicitly assume, for a given b-value, that the gradient sampling vectors are uniformly distributed on a sphere (or shell), computing the orientationally-averaged signal through simple arithmetic averaging. One challenge with this approach is that not all acquisition schemes have gradient sampling vectors distributed over perfect spheres (either by design, or due to gradient non-linearities). To ameliorate this challenge, alternative averaging methods include: weighted signal averaging; spherical harmonic representation of the signal in each shell; and using Mean Apparent Propagator MRI (MAP-MRI) to derive a three-dimensional signal representation and estimate its isotropic part. This latter approach can be applied to all q-space sampling schemes, making it suitable for multi-shell acquisitions when unwanted gradient non-linearities are present. Here, these different methods are compared under different signal-to-noise (SNR) realizations. With sufficiently dense sampling points (61points per shell), and isotropically-distributed sampling vectors, all methods give comparable results, (accuracy of MAP-MRI-based estimates being slightly higher albeit with slightly elevated bias as b-value increases). As the SNR and number of data points per shell are reduced, MAP-MRI-based approaches give pronounced improvements in accuracy over the other methods.

neuroscience↗

Using the residual bootstrap to quantify uncertainty in mean apparent propagator MRI

Estimation of noise-induced variability in MAP-MRI is needed to properly characterize the amount of uncertainty in quantities derived from the estimated MAP-MRI coefficients. Bootstrap metrics, such as the standard deviation, provides additional valuable diffusion information in addition to common MAP-MRI parameters, and can be incorporated in MAP-MRI studies to provide more extensive insight. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper to study the uncertainty of MAP-MRI derived metrics. The noise variability of quantities of MAP-MRI have been quantified using the residual bootstrap, in which the residuals are resampled using two sampling schemes. The residual bootstrap method can provide empirical distributions for MAP-MRI derived quantities, even when the exact distributions are not easily derived. The residual bootstrap methods are applied to SPARC data and HCP-MGH data, and empirical distributions are obtained for the zero-displacement probabilities. Here, we compare and contrast the residual bootstrap schemes using all shells and within the same shell. We show that residual resampling within each shell generates larger uncertainty than using all shells for the HCP-MGH data. Standard deviation and quartile coefficient maps of the estimated variability are provided.

neuroscience↗