bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Ovinge, L. P.

Publications and source records attributed to Ovinge, L. P..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Comparative Proteomics Across Tissues and Crop Agroecosystems Reveals Agricultural Stressor Responses in the Western Honey Bee

Maintaining honey bee health in crop production systems is increasingly difficult because worker bees encounter multiple chemical and biological pressures from pesticides and pathogens. How these field-realistic pressures affect molecular physiology across functionally distinct tissues remains poorly understood. Here, we tested whether tissue-resolved proteomics could separate stable tissue-specific patterns from crop-associated molecular changes. To do this, we profiled abdomen, gut, and head proteomes from honey bees collected across four Canadian crop ecosystems over two consecutive years, and integrated these data with pesticide-residue and pathogen-load measurements. Proteomic variation was structured by both tissue identity and crop environment. Tissue-specific proteomic profiles were characterized across samples, whereas crop-associated effects were detected in both years and were stronger in 2021, the second year of the study. Tissue-specific enrichment and network analyses linked the abdomen to lipid catabolism and ubiquitin-proteasome proteostasis, the gut to central carbon metabolism, membrane transport, vesicle trafficking, and cytoskeletal organization, and the head to neurosensory and mitochondrial functions, together with amino-sugar metabolism and vesicle-associated quality-control modules. Among the measured pesticide residues, boscalid was the most reproducible chemical correlate of proteomic variation, with the strongest signal in the gut. Cross-year validation associated boscalid exposure with reduced abundance of gut proteins involved in mitochondrial metabolism, protein quality control, vesicle trafficking, nutrient transport, and biosynthetic pathways. Additionally, integrated proteome-transcriptome-microbiome factor analysis further identified gut-centered components associated with measured stressor variables and linked protein-level variation to coordinated transcriptomic and microbial shifts. Independent-year validation showed that compact crop-associated protein signatures detected in 2020 were also present in 2021. Together, these results show that honey bee tissues maintain stable proteomic identities while showing tissue- and year-specific responses to pesticide and pathogen pressures encountered in crop ecosystems. The gut proteome may specifically provide a sensitive molecular indicator of pesticide-associated perturbation under field conditions.

bioinformatics↗

The effects of protein supplementation, fumagillin treatment, and colony management on the productivity and long-term survival of honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies in Canada

In this study, we intensively measured the longitudinal productivity and survival of 362 commercially managed honey bee colonies in Canada, over a two-year period. A full factorial experimental design was used, whereby two treatments were repeated across apiaries situated in three distinct geographic regions: Northern Alberta, Southern Alberta and Prince Edward Island, each having unique bee management strategies. In the protein supplemented treatment, colonies were continuously provided a commercial protein supplement containing 25% w/w pollen, in addition to any feed normally provided by beekeepers in that region. In the fumagillin treatment, colonies were treated with the label dose of Fumagilin-B(R) each year during the fall. Our study shows that that neither treatment provided consistent benefits across all sites and dates. Fumagillin was associated with a large increase in honey production only at the Northern Alberta site, while protein supplementation produced an early season increase in brood production only at the Southern Alberta site. The protein supplement provided no long-lasting benefit at any site and was also associated with an increased risk of death and decreased colony size later in the study. Differences in colony survival and productivity among regions, and among colonies within beekeeping operations, were far larger than the effects of either treatment, suggesting that returns from extra feed supplements and fumagillin were highly contextually dependent. We conclude that use of fumagillin is safe and sometimes beneficial, but that beekeepers should only consider excess protein supplementation when natural forage is limiting.

ecology↗