Biology subjects

Overton, J. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Overton, J. A..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

An Open Benchmark for Systems Vaccinology: Insights from the CMI-PB Challenges

Systems vaccinology approaches have identified factors affecting vaccine responses in multiple studies, but the ability of computational models to generalize these findings to unseen data remains unclear. We established a community resource to create and compare models predicting B. pertussis booster vaccination responses and put such modeling approaches to the test. We compiled multi-modal experimental training data from three independent cohorts (n=117 individuals), and asked investigators to predict vaccine responses in a cohort of 54 newly recruited individuals using only their pre-booster vaccination data. We benchmarked a total of 107 computational models. Top-performing models were characterized by workflows that prioritized rigorous data preprocessing, robust imputation of missing data, and the use of multi-omics integration or non-linear machine learning. We identified pre-existing antigen-specific antibody titers and baseline monocyte frequencies as the most consistent predictors of post-vaccination immunity, highlighting the dominant role of individual immune setpoints. We established the resulting datasets and evaluation framework as a community resource to advance predictive immunology and facilitate personalized vaccination strategies.

immunology↗

bioRxiv2025

Neural dynamics encoding risky choices during deliberation reveal separate choice subspaces

Human decision-making involves the coordinated activity of multiple brain areas, acting in concert, to enable humans to make choices. Most decisions are carried out under conditions of uncertainty, where the desired outcome may not be achieved if the wrong decision is made. In these cases, humans deliberate before making a choice. The neural dynamics underlying deliberation are unknown and intracranial recordings in clinical settings present a unique opportunity to record high temporal resolution electrophysiological data from many (hundreds) brain locations during behavior. Combined with dynamic systems modeling, these allow identification of latent brain states that describe the neural dynamics during decision-making, providing insight into these neural dynamics and computations. Results show that the neural dynamics underlying risky decision, but not decisions without risk, converge to separate subspaces depending on the subjects preferred choice and that the degree of overlap between these subspaces declines as choice approaches, suggesting a network level representation of evidence accumulation. These results bridge the gap between regression analyses and data driven models of latent states and suggest that during risky decisions, deliberation and evidence accumulation toward a final decision are represented by the same neural dynamics, providing novel insights into the neural computations underlying human choice. HighlightsO_LIHighly accurate decoding can be accomplished with dynamical systems modeling that revealed distinct attractor-like subspaces, one for each of the two options (gamble or safe bet). C_LIO_LIEarly during deliberation, single trial neural trajectories show rapid transitioning between these subspaces, but as the time of choice selection approached, the single trial trajectories converged towards one of the subspaces, whose identity was consistent with the subjects choice. C_LIO_LIThese dynamics are specific to risky decisions as we found classification accuracy dropped to chance for trials where the gamble option was guaranteed to be successful (100% win probability) or unsuccessful (0% win probability). C_LIO_LIThese results suggest that deliberation and evidence accumulation toward a final decision in the presence of any risk can be represented by the same neural dynamics, providing novel insights into the neural computations underlying human choice. C_LI

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

Neural Interoceptive Processing is Modulated by Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment Resistant Depression

BackgroundA critical advance in depression research is to clarify the hypothesized role of interoceptive processing in neural mechanisms of treatment efficacy. This study tests whether cortical interoceptive processing, as indexed by the heartbeat-evoked potential (HEP), is modulated by deep brain stimulation (DBS) to the subcallosal cingulate (SCC) for treatment resistant depression (TRD). MethodsEight patients with TRD were enrolled in a study of SCC DBS safety and efficacy. Electroencephalography (EEG) and symptom severity measures were sampled in a laboratory setting over the course of a six-month treatment protocol. The primary outcome measure was an EEG-derived HEP, which reflects cortical processing of heartbeat sensation. Cluster-based permutation analyses were used to test the effect of stimulation and time in treatment on the HEP. The change in signal magnitude after treatment was correlated with change in depression severity as measured by the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. ResultsHEP amplitude was greater after 24 weeks of treatment (t(7)=-4.40, p=.003, g=-1.38, 95% Cl [-2.3, -0.42]), and this change was inversely correlated with latency of treatment response (rho = -0.75, 95% Cl [-0.95, -0.11], p=.03). An acute effect of DBS was also observed, but as a decrease in HEP amplitude (t(6) =6.66, p<.001, g=2.19, 95% Cl [0.81, 3.54]). HEP differences were most pronounced over left posterior sensors from 405-425 ms post-stimulus. ConclusionBrain-based evidence substantiates a theorized link between interoception and depression, and suggests an interoceptive contribution to the mechanism of treatment efficacy with deep brain stimulation for severe depression.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

A systems vaccinology resource to develop and test computational models of immunity

Computational models that predict an individuals response to a vaccine offer the potential for mechanistic insights and personalized vaccination strategies. These models are increasingly derived from systems vaccinology studies that generate immune profiles from human cohorts pre- and post-vaccination. Most of these studies involve relatively small cohorts and profile the response to a single vaccine. The ability to assess the performance of the resulting models would be improved by comparing their performance on independent datasets, as has been done with great success in other areas of biology such as protein structure predictions. To transfer this approach to system vaccinology studies, we established a prototype platform that focuses on the evaluation of Computational Models of Immunity to Pertussis Booster vaccinations (CMI-PB). A community resource, CMI-PB generates experimental data for the explicit purpose of model evaluation, which is performed through a series of annual data releases and associated contests. We here report on our experience with the first such dry run for a contest where the goal was to predict individual immune responses based on pre-vaccination multi-omic profiles. Over 30 models adopted from the literature were tested, but only one was predictive, and was based on age alone. The performance of new models built using CMI-PB training data was much better, but varied significantly based on the choice of pre-vaccination features used and the model building strategy. This suggests that previously published models developed for other vaccines do not generalize well to Pertussis Booster vaccination. Overall, these results reinforced the need for comparative analysis across models and datasets that CMI-PB aims to achieve. We are seeking wider community engagement for our first public prediction contest, which will open in early 2024.

systems biology↗

bioRxiv2022

Multi-areal neural dynamics encode human decision making

Value-based decision-making involves multiple cortical and subcortical brain areas, but the distributed nature of neurophysiological activity underlying economic choices in the human brain remains largely unexplored. Here, we use intracranial recordings from neurosurgical patients to show that risky choices are reflected in high frequency activity distributed across multiple prefrontal and subcortical brain regions, whereas reward-related computations are less widely represented and more modular. State space modeling reveals sub-second neural dynamics underlying choices during deliberation and allows high-accuracy trial-by-trial decoding of subjects choices robustly across patients despite differences in anatomical coverage. These results shed light into the neural basis of choice across brain areas and open the door to new intracranial approaches for brain state decoding.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

OBO Foundry in 2021: Operationalizing Open Data Principles to Evaluate Ontologies

Biological ontologies are used to organize, curate, and interpret the vast quantities of data arising from biological experiments. While this works well when using a single ontology, integrating multiple ontologies can be problematic, as they are developed independently, which can lead to incompatibilities. The Open Biological and Biomedical Ontologies (OBO) Foundry was created to address this by facilitating the development, harmonization, application, and sharing of ontologies, guided by a set of overarching principles. One challenge in reaching these goals was that the OBO principles were not originally encoded in a precise fashion, and interpretation was subjective. Here we show how we have addressed this by formally encoding the OBO principles as operational rules and implementing a suite of automated validation checks and a dashboard for objectively evaluating each ontologys compliance with each principle. This entailed a substantial effort to curate metadata across all ontologies and to coordinate with individual stakeholders. We have applied these checks across the full OBO suite of ontologies, revealing areas where individual ontologies require changes to conform to our principles. Our work demonstrates how a sizable federated community can be organized and evaluated on objective criteria that help improve overall quality and interoperability, which is vital for the sustenance of the OBO project and towards the overall goals of making data FAIR.

bioinformatics↗