bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Ott, D.

Publications and source records attributed to Ott, D..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Targeting the paralog protein for degradation accounts for the opposite roles of NRBP1 and NRBP2 in regulating LINE1 retrotransposition

Gene duplication generates paralogs undergoing diverse fates during evolution and serves as a potent catalyst of biological complexity. Paralogs frequently share redundant functions and may also exhibit antagonistic activities by competing for common interaction partners. Here we show that the gene paralogs NRBP1 and NRBP2 oppositely regulate LINE1 retrotransposition, via influencing integrity of the LINE1 ribonucleoprotein complex. We demonstrate that the opposite roles of NRBP1 and NRBP2 are not results of a competitive mechanism, but rather due to targeting NRBP1 for proteasome-mediated decay by NRBP2, probably through heterodimer formation. Moreover, our phylogenetic analysis shows that the regulatory function of NRBP2 may be acquired later during evolution, suggesting that evolutionary pressure has favored this functional fine-tuning of NRBP1. In summary, our discovery not only identifies NRBP1/2 as novel LINE1 regulators and implicates their involvement in human pathogenesis, but also provides a novel insight into the regulatory details arising from gene duplication.

cell biology↗

The choice of plant provenance for ecological restoration affects pollinator network

The selection of plant provenance for ecological restoration is an intensively debated topic. Throughout this debate, arguments mostly focus on plant performance, but little attention is paid to the effects of provenance on other members of the restored ecosystem. On the other hand, in restoration projects that focus specifically on supporting interacting biota, for example flower stripes among fields to support pollinators, the provenance choice is often not considered, partly because the effect of provenance on pollinators is unknown. In this pioneering case study, we tested whether pollinators differentiate between experimental plant communities of different provenances. We established experimental plant communities with the same species composition but with plants originating from three different provenances. We then recorded plant phenology and observed pollinators and flower visitors interacting with these experimental communities and related the pollinator visitation to the provenance identity. The provenances of the experimental plant communities had a strong and significant effect on the diversity and abundance of flower-pollinator interactions, with one provenance interacting twice as often as the other two provenances. The effect was driven by the differences in flowering phenology among provenances. Synthesis and applicationsPlant provenances substantially differ in their interactions with local pollinators. Therefore, the selection of plant provenance should be considered when planning restoration projects for the support of pollinators.

ecology↗