bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Osborne, C. K.

Publications and source records attributed to Osborne, C. K..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Rat somatic genome editing enables ER+ breast cancer modeling

Genetically engineered mouse models have advanced cancer research but often fail to capture key features of certain human tumors. Rats, with distinct physiology and tumor biology, offer a powerful alternative, yet their use has been constrained by technical barriers to genome editing. Here, we report efficient somatic genome editing in rats, enabling both Indel and substitution mutations. We then apply this approach to model estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer, which accounts for [~]70% of human cases but remains poorly represented in mice. The resulting rat tumors reproduce hallmarks of human ER+ breast cancer, including ductal histology, hormone responsiveness, and immune-microenvironmental features. By contrast, identical genetic alterations in mice failed to yield ER+ tumors, underscoring critical species differences in tumorigenesis. Together, this work establishes a versatile platform for rapid generation of clinically relevant rat tumor models, opening new avenues to dissect tumor biology, therapeutic response, and immune interactions in previously inaccessible cancer subtypes.

cancer biology↗

Patient-Derived Xenografts of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Enable Deconvolution and Prediction of Chemotherapy Responses

Chemotherapy regimens for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) combine agents without knowing which agents drive response. Consequently, predictors derived from multi-agent regimens cannot be assumed to generalize to individual drugs or other regimens, motivating development of treatment-matched predictors. Here, we used TNBC patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) treated with carboplatin, docetaxel, or the combination to deconvolute drug-specific responses and identify associated molecular features. Combination treatment rarely improved upon the best single agent, with enhanced responses in only 13% of PDXs and antagonism in a comparable fraction. Proteogenomic analyses identified high cytokeratin-5 (KRT5) as a general marker of chemotherapy responsiveness and KRT5 immunohistochemistry discriminated responsive PDXs (AUROC, 0.83). To train treatment-specific predictors, we integrated these data with independent PDX and clinical cohorts with responses assessed after anthracycline-free platinum, taxane, or platinum-taxane therapy, ensuring response corresponded to the modeled treatment. Four feature selection strategies yielded largely nonoverlapping biomarker panels converging on treatment-relevant pathways. On independent test data, RNA-based predictors of complete response (CR) to platinum-based (carboplatin or cisplatin) and taxane-based (docetaxel or paclitaxel) chemotherapy achieved AUROCs of 0.80 and 0.86, respectively. For platinum-taxane regimens (carboplatin plus docetaxel or paclitaxel), proteomic-guided feature selection generated a 10-biomarker, protein- informed RNA predictor of pathologic complete response (pCR) that outperformed RNA-only feature selection and achieved an AUROC of 0.85 in an independent clinical cohort, while retaining practicality as an RNA-based assay. Treatment-matched integration of multi-omic PDX and clinical datasets provides a framework for chemotherapy-specific predictors with clinically relevant performance, supporting biomarker-guided precision selection and treatment optimization for patients with TNBC. Statement of significanceIntegration of multi-omic data from patient-derived xenografts with treatment-matched clinical cohorts yielded three retrospectively validated predictors of platinum, taxane, and platinum+taxane response, enabling biomarker-guided chemotherapy selection for patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

cancer biology↗