Biology subjects

Orozco, S. P.

Publications and source records attributed to Orozco, S. P..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

Control of tongue movements by the Purkinje cells of the cerebellum

We use our tongue much like our hands: to interact with objects and transport them. For example, we use our hands to sense properties of objects and transport them in the nearby space, and we use our tongue to sense properties of food morsels and transport them through the oral cavity. But what does the cerebellum contribute to control of tongue movements? Here, we trained head-fixed marmosets to make skillful tongue movements to harvest food from small tubes that were placed at sharp angles to their mouth. We identified the lingual regions of the cerebellar vermis and then measured the contribution of each Purkinje cell (P-cell) to control of the tongue by relying on the brief but complete suppression that they experienced following an input from the inferior olive. When a P-cell was suppressed during protraction, the tongues trajectory became hypermetric, and when the suppression took place during retraction, the tongues return to the mouth was slowed. Both effects were amplified when two P-cells were simultaneously suppressed. Therefore, suppression of P-cells in the lingual vermis disrupted the forces that would normally decelerate the tongue as it approached the target. Notably, the population simple spike activity peaked near deceleration onset when the movement required precision (aiming for a tube), but not when the movement was for the purpose of grooming. Thus, the P-cells appeared to signal when to stop protrusion as the tongue approached its target.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2024

Rejuvenating silicon probes for acute electrophysiology

Electrophysiological recording with a new probe often yields better signal quality than with a used probe. Why does the signal quality degrade after only a few experiments? Here, we considered silicon probes in which the contacts are densely packed, and each is coated with a conductive polymer that increases its surface area. We tested 12 Cambridge Neurotech silicon probes during 61 recording sessions from the brain of 3 marmosets. Out of the box, each probe arrived with an electrodeposited polymer coating on 64 gold contacts, and an impedance of around 50k Ohms. With repeated use, the impedance increased and there was a corresponding decrease in the number of well-isolated neurons. Imaging of the probes suggested that the reduction in signal quality was due to a gradual loss of the polymer coating. To rejuvenate the probes, we first stripped the contacts, completely removing their polymer coating, and then recoated them in a solution of 10 mM EDOT monomer with 32 uM PSS using a current density of about 3mA/cm2 for 30 seconds. This recoating process not only returned probe impedance to around 50k Ohms, it also yielded significantly improved signal quality during neurophysiological recordings. Thus, insertion into the brain promoted loss of the polymer that coated the contacts of the silicon probes. This led to degradation of signal quality, but recoating rejuvenated the probes.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

Effort cost of harvest affects decisions and movement vigor of marmosets during foraging

Our decisions are guided by how we perceive the value of an option, but this evaluation also affects how we move to acquire that option. Why should economic variables such as reward and effort alter the vigor of our movements? In theory, both the option that we choose and the vigor with which we move contribute to a measure of fitness in which the objective is to maximize rewards minus efforts, divided by time. To explore this idea, we engaged marmosets in a foraging task in which on each trial they decided whether to work by making saccades to visual targets, thus accumulating food, or to harvest by licking what they had earned. We varied the effort cost of harvest by moving the food tube with respect to the mouth. Theory predicted that the subjects should respond to the increased effort costs by choosing to work longer, stockpiling food before commencing harvest, but reduce their movement vigor to conserve energy. Indeed, in response to an increased effort cost of harvest, marmosets extended their work duration, but slowed their movements. These changes in decisions and movements coincided with changes in pupil size. As the effort cost of harvest declined, work duration decreased, the pupils dilated, and the vigor of licks and saccades increased. Thus, when acquisition of reward became effortful, the pupils constricted, the decisions exhibited delayed gratification, and the movements displayed reduced vigor. Significance statementOur results suggest that as the brainstem neuromodulatory circuits that control pupil size respond to effort costs, they alter computations in the brain regions that control decisions, encouraging work and delaying gratification, and the brain regions that control movements, reducing vigor and suppressing energy expenditure. This coordinated response suggests that decisions and actions are part of a single control policy that aims to maximize a variable relevant to fitness: the capture rate.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2020

Spontaneous recovery and the multiple timescales of human motor memory

In numerous paradigms, from fear conditioning to motor adaptation, memory exhibits a remarkable property: acquisition of a novel behavior followed by its extinction results in spontaneous recovery of the original behavior. A current model suggests that spontaneous recovery occurs because learning is supported by two different adaptive processes: one fast (high error sensitivity, low retention), and the other slow (low error sensitivity, high retention). Here, we searched for signatures of these hypothesized processes in the commands that guided single movements. We examined human saccadic eye movements and observed that following experience of a visual error, there was an adaptive change in the motor commands of the subsequent saccade, partially correcting for the error. However, the error correcting commands were expressed only during the deceleration period. If the errors persisted, the acceleration period commands also changed. Adaptation of acceleration period commands exhibited poor sensitivity to error, but the learning was resistant to forgetting. In contrast, the deceleration period commands adapted with high sensitivity to error, and the learning suffered from poor retention. Thus, within a single saccade, a fast-like process influenced the deceleration period commands, whereas a slow-like process influenced the acceleration period commands. Following extinction training, with passage of time motor memory exhibited spontaneous recovery, as evidenced by return of saccade endpoints toward their initial adapted state. The temporal dynamics of spontaneous recovery suggested that a single saccade is controlled by two different adaptive controllers, one active during acceleration, and the other during deceleration. Significance statementA feature of memory in many paradigms is the phenomenon of spontaneous recovery: learning followed by extinction inevitably leads to reversion toward the originally learned behavior. A theoretical model posits that spontaneous recovery is a feature of memory systems that learn with two independent learning processes, one fast, and the other slow. However, there have been no direct measures of these putative processes. Here, we found potential signatures of the two independent adaptive processes during control of a single saccade. The results suggest that distinct adaptive controllers contribute to the acceleration and deceleration phases of a saccade, and that each controller is supported by a fast and a slow learning process.

neuroscience↗