bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Ollivier, R.

Publications and source records attributed to Ollivier, R..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Pea-adapted biotype of the aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum induces susceptibility of pea to non-adapted biotype enabling improved feeding and performance

Most insect herbivores are adapted to feed on a few host plants only, but the mechanisms underlying plant specialization are poorly understood. One of the dominant hypotheses is that insects inject an oral secretion into the plant that manipulates the plants defences resulting in induced susceptibility. We tested this hypothesis on the pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum), which forms multiple biotypes, each specialized on specific legume hosts. In particular, we tested whether a pea-adapted biotype can induce host susceptibility on pea, which should positively affect the fitness of a non-pea-adapted biotype. We found that survival and fecundity of an alfalfa-adapted biotype on pea were enhanced by co-infestation but not pre-infestation with a pea-adapted biotype. The electrical penetration graph (EPG) method was then used to dissect the components of alfalfa biotype feeding behaviour on pea with and without co-infestation by the pea biotype. While probing time did not differ between these two conditions, differences were observed in most other EPG parameters. When co-infested with the pea-adapted biotype, the alfalfa-adapted biotype was more likely to establish a phloem feeding and exhibited a longer ingestion time on pea. Our results clearly indicated that the pea-adapted biotype induced pea susceptibility by increasing the accessibility of non-pea-adapted aphids to the host phloem sap, and as a result, the alfalfa biotype increased its survival rate and fecundity. These results contribute to understanding how aphids manipulate their specific host plants.

ecology↗

Enjoy The Violence: Is appreciation for extreme music the result of cognitive control over the threat response system?

Traditional neurobiological theories of musical emotions explain well why extreme music such as punk, hardcore or metal, whose vocal and instrumental characteristics share much similarity with acoustic threat signals, should evoke unpleasant feelings for a large proportion of listeners. Why it doesnt for metal music fans, however, remains a theoretical challenge: metal fans may differ from non-fans in how they process acoustic threat signals at the sub-cortical level, showing deactivated or reconditioned responses that differ from controls. Alternatively, it is also possible that appreciation for metal depends on the inhibition by cortical circuits of a normal low-order response to auditory threat. In a series of three experiments, we show here that, at a sensory level, metal fans actually react equally negatively, equally fast and even more accurately to cues of auditory threat in vocal and instrumental contexts than non-fans. Conversely, cognitive load somewhat appears to reduce fans appreciation of metal to the level reported by non-fans. Taken together, these results are not compatible with the idea that extreme music lovers do so because of a different low-level response to threat, but rather, highlight a critical contribution of higher-order cognition to the aesthetic experience. These results are discussed in the light of recent higher-order theories of emotional consciousness, which we argue should be generalized to the emotional experience of music across musical genres.

neuroscience↗