bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Obokata, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Obokata, J..

8 recordsLinked to original sources

Transcription of damage-induced RNA in Arabidopsis was frequently initiated from DSB loci within the genic regions

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most severe DNA lesions and need to be removed immediately to prevent loss of genomic information. Recently, it has been revealed that DSBs induce de novo transcription from the cleavage sites in various species, resulting in RNAs being referred to as damage-induced RNAs (diRNAs). While diRNA synthesis is an early event in the DNA damage response and plays an essential role in DSB repair activation, the location where diRNAs are newly generated in plant remains unclear, as does their transcriptional mechanism. Here, we performed RNA sequencing of diRNAs that emerged around all DSB loci in Arabidopsis thaliana under the expression of the exogenous restriction enzyme Sbf I and observed 88 diRNAs in 360 DSB loci. Most of the detected diRNAs originated within the active genes and were transcribed from DSBs in a bidirectional manner. Furthermore, we found that diRNA elongation tends to terminate at the boundary of an endogenous gene located near DSB loci. Our results provide reliable evidence for understanding the importance of de novo transcription at DSBs and show that diRNA is a crucial factor for successful DSB repair.

molecular biology↗

Inducible expression of the restriction enzyme uncovered genome-wide distribution and dynamic behavior of histones H4K16ac and H2A.Z at DNA double-strand breaks in Arabidopsis

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are among the most serious types of DNA damage and cause mutations and chromosomal rearrangements. In eukaryotes, DSBs are immediately repaired in coordination with chromatin remodeling for the deposition of DSB-related histone modifications and variants. To elucidate the details of DSB-dependent chromatin remodeling throughout the genome, artificial DSBs need to be reproducibly induced at various genomic loci. Recently, in mammals, a comprehensive method for elucidating chromatin remodeling at multiple DSB loci via chemically induced expression of a restriction enzyme was developed. However, this DSB induction system is not suitable for investigating chromatin remodeling during and after DSB repair, and such approach has not been performed in plants. Here, we established a transgenic Arabidopsis plant harboring a restriction enzyme gene Sbf I driven by a heat-inducible promoter. Using this transgenic plant, we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by deep sequencing (ChIP-seq) of histones H4K16ac and H2A.Z and investigated dynamics of these histone marks around the endogenous 623 Sbf I recognition sites. We also precisely quantified DSB efficiency at all cleavage sites using the DNA resequencing data obtained by ChIP-seq procedures. From the results, Sbf I-induced DSBs were detected at 360 loci and induced the transient deposition of H4K16ac and H2A.Z around these regions. Interestingly, we also observed the co-localization of H4K16ac and H2A.Z at some DSB loci. Overall, DSB-dependent chromatin remodeling was found to be a highly conserved between plants and animals. These findings provide new insights into chromatin remodeling that occurs in response to DSBs in Arabidopsis.

molecular biology↗

Cryptic promoter activation occurs by at least two different mechanisms in the Arabidopsis genome

In gene-trap screening of plant genomes, promoterless reporter constructs are often expressed without trapping of annotated gene promoters. The molecular basis of this phenomenon, which has been interpreted as the trapping of cryptic promoters, is poorly understood. In this study, using Arabidopsis gene-trap lines in which a firefly luciferase (LUC) open reading frame (ORF) was expressed from intergenic regions, we found that cryptic promoter activation occurs by at least two different mechanisms: one is the capturing of pre-existing promoter-like chromatin marked by H3K4me3 and H2A.Z, and the other is the entirely new formation of promoter chromatin near the 5 end of the inserted LUC ORF. To discriminate between these, we denoted the former mechanism as "cryptic promoter capturing", and the latter one as "promoter de novo origination". The latter finding raises a question as to how inserted LUC ORF sequence is involved in this phenomenon. To examine this, we performed a model experiment with chimeric LUC genes in transgenic plants. Using Arabidopsis psaH1 promoter-LUC constructs, we found that the functional core promoter region, where transcription start sites (TSS) occur, cannot simply be determined by the upstream nor core promoter sequences; rather, its positioning proximal to the inserted LUC ORF sequence was more critical. This result suggests that the insertion of the LUC ORF sequence alters the local distribution of the TSS in the plant genome. The possible impact of the two types of cryptic promoter activation mechanisms on plant genome evolution and endosymbiotic gene transfer is discussed.

evolutionary biology↗

Plant genome response to incoming coding sequences: stochastic transcriptional activation independent of chromatin configuration

Horizontal gene transfer can occur between phylogenetically distant organisms, such as prokaryotes and eukaryotes. In these cases, how do the translocated genes acquire transcriptional competency in the alien eukaryotic genome? According to the conventional view, specific loci of the eukaryotic genome are thought to provide transcriptional competency to the incoming coding sequences. To examine this possibility, we randomly introduced the promoterless luciferase (LUC)-coding sequences into the genome of Arabidopsis thaliana cultured cells and performed a genome-wide "transgene location vs. expression" scan. We mapped 4,504 promoterless LUC inserts on the A. thaliana chromosomes, and found that about 30% of them were transcribed. Only a small portion of them were explained by the conventional transcriptional fusions with the annotated genes, and the remainder occurred in a quite different manner; (1) they occurred all over the chromosomal regions, (2) independently of the insertion sites relative to the annotated gene loci, inherent transcribed regions, or heterochromatic regions, and (3) with one magnitude lower transcriptional level than the conventional transcriptional fusions. This type of transcriptional activation occurred at about 30% of the inserts, raising a question as to what this 30% means. We tested two hypotheses: the activation occurred at 30% of the entire chromosomal regions, or stochastically at 30% of each insertion event. Our experimental analysis indicates that the latter model could explain this transcriptional activation, a new type of plant genome response to the incoming coding sequences. We discuss the possible mechanisms and evolutionary roles of this phenomenon in the plant genome.

evolutionary biology↗

Kozak sequence acts as a negative regulator for de novo transcription initiation of newborn coding sequences in the plant genome

The manner in which newborn coding sequences and their transcriptional competency emerge during the process of gene evolution remains unclear. Here, we experimentally simulated eukaryotic gene origination processes by mimicking horizontal gene transfer events in the plant genome. We mapped the precise position of the transcription start sites (TSSs) of hundreds of newly introduced promoterless firefly luciferase (LUC) coding sequences in the genome of Arabidopsis thaliana cultured cells. The systematic characterization of the LUC-TSSs revealed that 80% of them occurred under the influence of endogenous promoters, while the remainder underwent de novo activation in the intergenic regions, starting from pyrimidine-purine dinucleotides. These de novo TSSs obeyed unexpected rules; they predominantly occurred ~100 bp upstream of the LUC inserts and did not overlap with Kozak-containing putative open reading frames (ORFs). These features were the output of the immediate responses to the sequence insertions, rather than a bias in the screening of the LUC gene function. Regarding the wild-type genic TSSs, they appeared to have evolved to lack any ORFs in their vicinities. Therefore, the repulsion by the de novo TSSs of Kozak-containing ORFs described above might be the first selection gate for the occurrence and evolution of TSSs in the plant genome. Based on these results, we characterized the de novo type of TSS identified in the plant genome and discuss its significance in genome evolution.

evolutionary biology↗

De novo activated transcription of newborn coding sequences is inheritable in the plant genome

The manner in which inserted foreign coding sequences become transcriptionally activated and fixed in the plant genome is poorly understood. To examine such processes of gene evolution, we performed an artificial evolutionary experiment in Arabidopsis thaliana. As a model of gene-birth events, we introduced a promoterless coding sequence of the firefly luciferase (LUC) gene and established 386 T2-generation transgenic lines. Among them, we determined the individual LUC insertion loci in 76 lines and found that one-third of them were transcribed de novo even in the intergenic or inherently unexpressed regions. In the transcribed lines, transcription-related chromatin marks were detected across the newly activated transcribed regions. These results agreed with our previous findings in A. thaliana cultured cells under a similar experimental scheme. A comparison of the results of the T2-plant and cultured cell experiments revealed that the de novo-activated transcription concomitant with local chromatin remodelling was inheritable. During one-generation inheritance, it seems likely that the transcription activities of the LUC inserts trapped by the endogenous genes/transcripts became stronger, while those of de novo transcription in the intergenic/untranscribed regions became weaker. These findings may offer a clue for the elucidation of the mechanism by which inserted foreign coding sequences become transcriptionally activated and fixed in the plant genome.

evolutionary biology↗

Chloroplast acquisition without the gene transfer in kleptoplastic sea slugs

Some sea slugs sequester chloroplasts from algal food in their intestinal cells and photosynthesize for months. This phenomenon, kleptoplasty, poses a question of how the chloroplast retains its activity without the algal nucleus. There have been debates on the horizontal transfer of algal genes to the animal nucleus. To settle the arguments, this study reported the genome of a kleptoplastic sea slug Plakobranchus ocellatus and found no evidence of photosynthetic genes encoded on the nucleus. Nevertheless, it was confirmed that light illumination prolongs the life of mollusk under starvation. These data presented a paradigm that a complex adaptive trait, as typified by photosynthesis, can be transferred between eukaryotic kingdoms by a unique organelle transmission without nuclear gene transfer. Our phylogenomic analysis showed that genes for proteolysis and immunity undergo gene expansion and are up-regulated in chloroplast-enriched tissue, suggesting that these molluskan genes are involved in the DNA-independent phenotype acquisition.

evolutionary biology↗

Large DNA virus promoted the endosymbiotic evolution to make a photosynthetic eukaryote

Chloroplasts in photosynthetic eukaryotes originated from a cyanobacterial endosymbiosis far more than 1 billion years ago1-3. Due to this ancientness, it remains unclear how this evolutionary process proceeded. To unveil this mystery, we analysed the whole genome sequence of a photosynthetic rhizarian amoeba4, Paulinella micropora5,6, which has a chloroplast-like organelle that originated from another cyanobacterial endosymbiosis7-10 about 0.1 billion years ago11. Here we show that the predacious amoeba that engulfed cyanobacteria evolved into a photosynthetic organism very quickly in the evolutionary time scale, probably aided by the drastic genome reorganization activated by large DNA virus. In the endosymbiotic evolution of eukaryotic cells, gene transfer from the endosymbiont genome to the host nucleus is essential for the evolving host cell to control the endosymbiont-derived organelle12. In P. micropora, we found that the gene transfer from the free-living and endosymbiotic bacteria to the amoeba nucleus was rapidly activated but both simultaneously ceased within the initiation period of the endosymbiotic evolution, suggesting that the genome reorganization drastically proceeded and completed. During this period, large DNA virus appeared to have infected the amoeba, followed by the rapid amplification and diversification of virus-related genes. These findings led us to re-examine the conventional endosymbiotic evolutionary scenario that exclusively deals with the host and the symbiont, and to extend it by incorporating a third critical player, large DNA virus, which activates the drastic gene transfer and genome reorganization between them. This Paulinella version of the evolutionary hypothesis deserves further testing of its generality in evolutionary systems and could shed light on the unknown roles of large DNA viruses13 in the evolution of terrestrial life.

evolutionary biology↗