bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Oancea, P.

Publications and source records attributed to Oancea, P..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Sex differences in pain: Spinal cord injury in female and male mice elicits neuropathic pain symptoms

Spinal cord injury (SCI) in humans frequently causes intractable chronic pain. Females are susceptible to worsened pain compared to males, and females may show higher pain prevalence after SCI. Despite this difference in clinical prevalence of SCI pain, few preclinical studies have systematically studied in rodents sex differences in SCI-elicited pain-related behaviors. Here, we leverage data from a large cohort of mice to test whether contusion SCI consistently causes pain symptoms in mice, and to establish whether female (vs. male) mice display heightened hypersensitivity after SCI. Mechanical and heat sensory thresholds were assessed using the von Frey test and Hargreaves test, respectively. In an initial experiment, female mice receiving moderate 60 kDyn SCI or moderate-to-severe 75 kDyn SCI at T9 both exhibited mechanical and heat pain symptoms compared to sham controls. 75 kDyn SCI caused excess motor deficits that confounded defining pain sensitivity at acute times, so the moderate SCI force was used for subsequent experiments. Next, adult female and male C57BL6/J mice received sham surgery or T9 moderate contusion SCI. Comparing female to male mice after SCI, we reveal that mice of both sexes displayed mechanical and heat hypersensitivity compared to sham controls, from acute-to-chronic post-injury times. Females had amplified SCI-elicited hypersensitivity compared to males. Our data suggest that thoracic contusion SCI elicits consistent and persistent pain-associated symptoms, which are more intense in female vs. male mice. These results have important implications for uncovering sex-specific mechanisms and therapeutic targets to ameliorate neuropathic pain after SCI.

neuroscience↗

Anxiety-like behaviors in mice unmasked: Revealing sex differences in anxiety using a novel light-heat conflict test

Anxiety and chronic pain afflict hundreds of millions worldwide. Both anxiety and pain are more prevalent in females compared to males. Unfortunately, robust sex differences in human anxiety are not recapitulated in rodent tests, and results from rodent pain studies frequently fail to translate clinically. Therefore, there is a need to develop tests that reflect the differential salience of anxiety or pain-related stimuli between the sexes. Accordingly, here we introduce the Thermal Increments Dark-Light (TIDAL) conflict test. The TIDAL test places an anxiety-relevant stimulus (dark vs. illuminated chamber) in conflict with a heat-related stimulus (incrementally heated vs. isothermic chamber); mice freely explore the dark-heating and illuminated-isothermic chambers. Here, we aim to determine whether the TIDAL conflict test reveals in mice underappreciated sex differences in anxiety and/or heat sensitivity. We establish in four distinct experiments that females on the TIDAL conflict test persist substantially longer on the dark-heated plate, suggesting that females as compared to males exhibit elevated anxiety-like behavior. Mice more strongly prefer the dark plate on the TIDAL conflict test compared to control thermal place preference with both chambers illuminated. We also reveal that an anxiety-relieving drug, paroxetine, reduces mouse preference for the heating dark plate, supporting the validity of the TIDAL test. Therefore, our new TIDAL conflict test reliably unmasks the relative salience of anxiety (vs. heat sensitivity): mice that are female exhibit robust anxiety-like behaviors not consistently observed in classical tests. Future studies should incorporate TIDAL and other conflict tests to better understand rodent behavior and to identify mechanisms underlying anxiety and pain.

neuroscience↗