bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Oakey, S. J.

Publications and source records attributed to Oakey, S. J..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Body size affects immune cell proportions in birds and non-volant mammals, but not bats

Powered flight has evolved several times in vertebrates and constrains morphology and physiology in ways that likely have shaped how organisms cope with infections. Some of these constraints likely have impacts on aspects of immunology, such that larger fliers might prioritize risk reduction and safety. Addressing how the evolution of flight may have driven relationships between body size and immunity could be particularly informative for understanding the propensity of some taxa to harbor many virulent and sometimes zoonotic pathogens without showing clinical disease. Here, we used a scaling framework to quantify scaling relationships between body mass and the proportions of two types of white blood cells--lymphocytes, and granulocytes (neutr-/heterophils)--across 60 bat species, 414 bird species, and 256 non-volant mammal species. By using phylogenetically-informed statistical models on field-collected data from wild Neotropical bats, data gleaned from other wild bats available in the literature, and data from captive non-volant mammals and birds, we show that lymphocyte and neutrophil proportions do not vary systematically with body mass among bats. In contrast, larger birds and non-volant mammals have disproportionately higher granulocyte proportions than expected for their body size. Future comparative studies of wild bats, birds, and non-volant mammals of similar body mass should aim to further differentiate evolutionary effects and other aspects of life history on immune defense. Summary statementPowered flight might constrain morphology such that certain immunological features are prioritized. We show that bats largely have similar cell proportions across body mass compared to strong allometric scaling relationships in birds and non-flying mammals.

physiology

Extreme hyperallometry of mammalian antibacterial defenses

Terrestrial mammals span 7 orders of magnitude in body size, ranging from the < 2 g pygmy shrew (Suncus etruscus) to the > 3900 kg African elephant (Loxodonta africana). Although body size has profound effects on the behavior, physiology, ecology, and evolution of animals, how investment in immune defenses changes with body size is unknown. Here, we develop a novel 12-point dilution-curve approach to describe and compare antibacterial capacity against 3 bacterial species among >160 terrestrial species of mammals. We show that antibacterial activity in serum across mammals exhibits isometry, but the serum of large mammals is less hospitable to bacteria than would be predicted by their metabolic rates. Specifically, hypometric metabolic rates would predict that a large species should have disproportionately lower antibacterial capacity than small species, but body size is unrelated to killing capacity across species. Scaling of antibacterial immune defenses provides novel perspectives on the ecology of host-pathogen interactions, and on their co-evolutionary dynamics. These results have direct implications for effectively modeling the evolution of immune defenses and identifying potential reservoir hosts of zoonotic pathogens.

ecology