bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Northrup, G. R.

Publications and source records attributed to Northrup, G. R..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

The impacts of almond pollination on honeybee viral dynamics

Seasonal aggregation of hosts can rapidly reshape microbial and viral communities, with consequences for disease dynamics and spillover risk. Each year, millions of honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies experience a mass human-mediated intercontinental migration to Californias Central Valley to pollinate most of the worlds almond supply. Clearly, this mass mixing event with hives from across the country has the risk of spreading highly virulent pathogens, including viruses. It is essential to weigh the benefits of the almond bloom against the risks of disease in honeybees, which may also affect native pollinators. We conducted an observational longitudinal RNA-seq study of colonies from a commercial beekeeping operation before, during, and after almond pollination, compared with non-migrating control colonies. We found that viral diversity increased in honeybee colonies during and directly after the bloom; however, it returned to pre-bloom levels a month later. The virome community composition also became more uniform between hives after the bloom. Hives in closer proximity had more similar viromes. This spatial variation suggests that inter-colony drift is a potential transmission route. Together, these findings suggest that the bloom increases viral transmission, with no single virus dominating the communities. Instead, a group of viruses (black queen cell virus, Lake Sinai Virus, deformed wing virus) were responsible for community shifts. Although crop bloom increased viral diversity and community homogenization, this effect was short-lived, with viromes reverting to pre-bloom levels once hives left the orchards. These findings indicate that pollination events can transiently restructure viral communities in managed bees.

microbiology↗

The Evolutionary Dynamics of Hyperparasites

Evolutionary theory has typically focused on pairwise interactions, such as those between hosts and parasites, with relatively little work on more complex interactions including hyperparasites: parasites of parasites. Hyperparasites are common in nature, with the chestnut blight fungus virus CHV-1 a well-known natural example, but also notably include the phages of important human bacterial diseases. Theory on hyperparasitism has mostly focused on their impact on the evolution of virulence of their parasite host and relatively little is known about evolutionary trajectories of hyperparasites themselves. Our general modeling framework highlights the central role the that ability of a hyperparasite to be transmitted with its parasite plays in their evolution. Hyperparasites which transmit with their parasite hosts (hitchhike) will be selected for lower virulence, trending towards hypermutualism or hypercommensalism and select against causing a reduction in parasite virulence (hypovirulence). We examine the impact on the evolution of hyperparasite systems a of a wide range of host and parasite traits showing, for example, that high parasite virulence selects for higher hyperparasite virulence feeding back into selection for hypovirulence in the parasite. Our results have implications for hyperparasite research, both as biocontrol agents and for understanding of how hyperparasites shape community ecology and evolution.

evolutionary biology↗