Biology subjects

Noreika, V.

Publications and source records attributed to Noreika, V..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2018

Parental neural responsivity to infants visual attention: how mature brains scaffold immature brains during social interaction.

Almost all attention and learning - in particular, most early learning - takes place in social settings. But little is known of how our brains support dynamic social interactions. We recorded dual-EEG from infants and parents during solo play and joint play. During solo play, fluctuations in infants Theta power significantly forward-predicted their subsequent attentional behaviours. But this forwards-predictiveness was lower during joint play than solo play, suggesting that infants endogenous neural control over attention is greater during solo play. Overall, however, infants were more attentive to the objects during joint play. To understand why, we examined how adult brain activity related to infant attention. We found that parents Theta power closely tracked and responded to changes in their infants attention. Further, instances in which parents showed greater neural responsivity were associated with longer sustained attention by infants. Our results offer new insights into how one partner influences another during social interaction.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2017

Wakefulness state modulates conscious access: Suppression of auditory detection in the transition to sleep

Mapping the reports of awareness and its neural underpinnings is instrumental to understand the limits of human perception. The capacity to become aware of objects in the world may be studied by suppressing faint target stimuli with strong masking stimuli, or - alternatively - by manipulating the level of wakefulness from full alertness to mild drowsiness. By combining these two approaches, we studied how perceptual awareness is modulated by decreasing wakefulness. We found dynamic changes in behavioural and neural signatures of conscious access in humans between awake and drowsy states. Behaviourally, we show a decrease in the steepness of the psychophysical function for conscious access in drowsy trials. Neural mapping showed delayed processing of target-mask interaction as the consciousness transition progressed, suggesting that the brain resolution of conscious access shifts from early sensory/perceptual to decision-making stages of processing. Once the goal to report the awareness of a target is set, the system behaviourally adapts to rapid changes in wakefulness, revealing the flexibility of the neural signatures of conscious access, and its suppression, to maintain performance. Significance statementMaintaining full alertness for long periods of time in attentionally demanding situations is challenging and may lead to a decrease in performance. We show the effect of wakefulness fluctuations on behaviour and brain dynamics that humans use to maintain performance. We reveal the neural strategies we have to cope with drowsiness by shifting the weights to more flexible brain processes and relaxing the precision of the decisions we take.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2017

Neurobehavioral dynamics of drowsiness

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been widely used in human cognitive neuroscience to examine the causal role of distinct cortical areas in perceptual, cognitive and motor functions. However, it is widely acknowledged that the effects of focal cortical stimulation on behaviour can vary substantially between participants and even from trial to trial within individuals. Here we asked whether spontaneous fluctuations in alertness can account for the variability in behavioural and neurophysiological responses to TMS. We combined single-pulse TMS with neural recording via electroencephalography (EEG) to quantify changes in motor and cortical reactivity with fluctuating levels of alertness defined objectively on the basis of ongoing brain activity. We observed rapid, non-linear changes in TMS-evoked neural responses - specifically, motor evoked potentials and TMS-evoked cortical potentials - as EEG activity indicated decreasing levels of alertness, even while participants remained awake and responsive in the behavioural task.\n\nIMPACT STATEMENTA substantial proportion of inter-trial variability in neurophysiological responses to TMS is due to spontaneous fluctuations in alertness, which should be controlled for during experimental and clinical applications of TMS.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2017

Altered neurocognitive processing of tactile stimuli in patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS)

Chronic pain in CRPS has been linked to tactile misperceptions and deficits in somatotopic representation of the affected limb. Here, we identify altered cognitive processing of tactile stimuli in CRPS patients that we propose marks heterogeneity in tactile decision-making mechanisms. In a case-control design, we compared middle and late-latency somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) in response to pseudo-randomised mechanical stimulation of the digits of both hands (including CRPS-affected and non-affected sides) between 13 CRPS patients and 13 matched healthy controls. During a task to discriminate the digit simulated, patients (compared to controls) had significantly lower accuracy and slowed response times but with high between-subject variability. At middle latencies (124-132 ms), tactile processing in patients relative to controls showed decrements in superior parietal lobe and precuneus (that were independent of task demands) but enhanced activity in superior frontal lobe (that were task-dependent). At late latencies, patients showed an augmented P300-like response under task demands that localised to supplementary motor area (SMA). Source activity in SMA correlated with slowed response times, while its scalp representation intriguingly correlated with better functioning of the affected limb, suggesting a compensatory mechanism. Future research should investigate the clinical utility of these putative markers of tactile decision-making mechanisms in CRPS.\n\nDisclosuresThe research was supported by funding from Cambridge Arthritis Research Endeavour (CARE). The study was sponsored by Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and supported by its Rheumatology department. The authors report no conflicts of interest.\n\nPerspectiveWe present evidence of altered but highly variable cognitive processing (124 - 268ms latency) in response to mechanical tactile stimuli in patients with CRPS compared to healthy controls. Such mid-to-late latency responses could potentially provide convenient and robust biomarkers of abnormal perceptual decision-making mechanisms in CRPS to aid in clinical detection and treatment.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2017

Integration And Differentiation Of Neural Information Dissociate Between Conscious Percepts

At any given moment, we experience a perceptual scene as a single whole and yet we may distinguish a variety of objects within it. This phenomenon instantiates two properties of conscious perception: integration and differentiation. Integration to experience a collection of objects as a unitary percept, and differentiation to experience these objects as distinct from each other. Here we evaluated the neural information dynamics underlying integration and differentiation of perceptual contents during bistable perception. Participants listened to a sequence of tones (auditory bistable stimuli) experienced either as a single stream (perceptual integration) or as two parallel streams (perceptual differentiation) of sounds. We computed neurophysiological indices of information integration and information differentiation with electroencephalographic and intracranial recordings. When perceptual alternations were endogenously driven, the integrated percept was associated with an increase in neural information-integration and a decrease in neural differentiation across frontoparietal regions, whereas the opposite pattern was observed for the differentiated percept. However, when perception was exogenously driven by a change in the sound stream (no bistability) neural oscillatory power distinguished between percepts but information measures did not. We demonstrate that perceptual integration and differentiation can be mapped to theoretically-motivated neural information signatures, suggesting a direct relationship between phenomenology and neurophysiology.

neuroscience↗